• H. S. Teoh (9/9) Mar 28 2013 Just wondering what's the status of the new std.uni. Isn't it supposed
• Dmitry Olshansky (12/16) Mar 29 2013 Would be nice provided that we find the review manager.

"H. S. Teoh" <hsteoh quickfur.ath.cx> writes:

Just wondering what's the status of the new std.uni. Isn't it supposed
to be going through review right now? Or was it merged and I missed it?
I'd *really* like to have it in the next release. Can we kickstart its
review and inclusion in Phobos ASAP?


T

-- 
The peace of mind---from knowing that viruses which exploit Microsoft
system vulnerabilities cannot touch Linux---is priceless. -- Frustrated
system administrator.

Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh gmail.com> writes:

29-Mar-2013 06:05, H. S. Teoh пишет:
 Just wondering what's the status of the new std.uni. Isn't it supposed
 to be going through review right now? Or was it merged and I missed it?
 I'd *really* like to have it in the next release. Can we kickstart its
 review and inclusion in Phobos ASAP?

Would be nice provided that we find the review manager.
The last two things I need to do with it are:

1. Put it as a pull request for Phobos
2. Add a table of Blocks, Scripts and properties that are actually 
supported to the DDOCs.

Maybe some other minor nits that you have found that I haven't fixed up 
yet :)

In any event it looks like std.process is getting a bit ahead of std.uni 
e.g. it has a pull request ...

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky