• Don (8/8) Sep 01 2010 To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
• user (1/7) Sep 01 2010 Thats ridiclous. The only purpose for prioriting these bugs is- you fail...
• dsimcha (4/5) Sep 01 2010 of development.
• Yao G. (4/13) Sep 01 2010 Why, hello there retard!
• Andrei Alexandrescu (4/15) Sep 01 2010 "retard" has recently made admirable efforts to write good, informative
• Gareth Charnock (2/9) Sep 01 2010 Don't feed the trolls, that is all.
• Stanislav Blinov (2/11) Sep 01 2010 Is it just me, or spam bots suddenly became incredibly clever?
• Andrej Mitrovic (7/26) Sep 01 2010 If they were clever they wouldn't target an audience of programmers. :)
• Daniel Gibson (2/22) Sep 01 2010 You call that clever? O_o
• Stanislav Blinov (2/6) Sep 01 2010 For a bot. It almost seems as there is some intelligence behind this.
• Gareth Charnock (4/10) Sep 01 2010 I checked and bug #1 isn't actually "give up already", but I'm now

Don <nospam nospam.com> writes:

To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the 
compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it 
easier to search for them.
These bugs have high priority.

Also note that all new bugs should have version marked as "D1", "D2" or 
"D1&D2", depending on where the bug has been observed. The long list of 
specific compiler versions should be ignored, it has always been 
completely useless.

user <admin net.net> writes:

 To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
 compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
 easier to search for them.  These bugs have high priority.

 To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
 compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
 easier to search for them.  These bugs have high priority.

Thats ridiclous. The only purpose for prioriting these bugs is- you fail at
compiler construction. The language is so full of shit.. why not be more
honest? you had over 10 years of time to develop basic foundations but its
still a amateurish attempt at language design. Tell me about another language
which is so much work in progress after 10 years of development. They are all
so stable. If I want I can build a 'E' language and fix all your legacy bugs. D

already'. Someone marked it wontfix.

dsimcha <dsimcha yahoo.com> writes:

== Quote from user (admin net.net)'s article
 Tell me about another language which is so much work in progress after 10 years

of development.

Python circa 2001?  Lisp circa 1968?  C++ circa 1993?  C circa 1982?  You're a
funny, funny guy.

"Yao G." <yao.gomez spam.gmail.com> writes:

On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:49:46 -0500, user <admin net.net> wrote:

 Thats ridiclous. The only purpose for prioriting these bugs is- you fail  
 at compiler construction. The language is so full of shit.. why not be  
 more honest? you had over 10 years of time to develop basic foundations  
 but its still a amateurish attempt at language design. Tell me about  
 another language which is so much work in progress after 10 years of  
 development. They are all so stable. If I want I can build a 'E'  
 language and fix all your legacy bugs. D is nowhere near perfection. The  

 wontfix.

Why, hello there retard!

-- 
Yao G.

Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:

On 9/1/10 11:12 CDT, Yao G. wrote:
 On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:49:46 -0500, user <admin net.net> wrote:

 Thats ridiclous. The only purpose for prioriting these bugs is- you
 fail at compiler construction. The language is so full of shit.. why
 not be more honest? you had over 10 years of time to develop basic
 foundations but its still a amateurish attempt at language design.
 Tell me about another language which is so much work in progress after
 10 years of development. They are all so stable. If I want I can build
 a 'E' language and fix all your legacy bugs. D is nowhere near

 Someone marked it wontfix.

 Why, hello there retard!

"retard" has recently made admirable efforts to write good, informative 
posts. Let's respond to that in kind. Thanks.

Andrei

Gareth Charnock <gareth.charnock gmail.com> writes:

On 01/09/10 16:49, user wrote:
 To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
 compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
 easier to search for them.  These bugs have high priority.

 To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
 compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
 easier to search for them.  These bugs have high priority.

 Thats ridiclous. The only purpose for prioriting these bugs is- you fail at
compiler construction. The language is so full of shit.. why not be more
honest? you had over 10 years of time to develop basic foundations but its
still a amateurish attempt at language design. Tell me about another language
which is so much work in progress after 10 years of development. They are all
so stable. If I want I can build a 'E' language and fix all your legacy bugs. D

already'. Someone marked it wontfix.

Don't feed the trolls, that is all.

Stanislav Blinov <stanislav.blinov gmail.com> writes:

user wrote:
 To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
 compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
 easier to search for them.  These bugs have high priority.

 
 To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
 compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
 easier to search for them.  These bugs have high priority.

 
 Thats ridiclous. The only purpose for prioriting these bugs is- you fail at
compiler construction. The language is so full of shit.. why not be more
honest? you had over 10 years of time to develop basic foundations but its
still a amateurish attempt at language design. Tell me about another language
which is so much work in progress after 10 years of development. They are all
so stable. If I want I can build a 'E' language and fix all your legacy bugs. D

already'. Someone marked it wontfix.

Is it just me, or spam bots suddenly became incredibly clever?

Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich gmail.com> writes:

If they were clever they wouldn't target an audience of programmers. :)

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Stanislav Blinov
<stanislav.blinov gmail.com> wrote:
 user wrote:
 To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
 compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
 easier to search for them. =A0These bugs have high priority.

 To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
 compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
 easier to search for them. =A0These bugs have high priority.

 Thats ridiclous. The only purpose for prioriting these bugs is- you fail
 at compiler construction. The language is so full of shit.. why not be m=


ore
 honest? you had over 10 years of time to develop basic foundations but i=


ts
 still a amateurish attempt at language design. Tell me about another
 language which is so much work in progress after 10 years of development=


.
 They are all so stable. If I want I can build a 'E' language and fix all



lla
 was 'just give up already'. Someone marked it wontfix.

 Is it just me, or spam bots suddenly became incredibly clever?

Daniel Gibson <metalcaedes gmail.com> writes:

Stanislav Blinov schrieb:
 user wrote:
 To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
 compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
 easier to search for them.  These bugs have high priority.

 To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
 compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
 easier to search for them.  These bugs have high priority.

 Thats ridiclous. The only purpose for prioriting these bugs is- you 
 fail at compiler construction. The language is so full of shit.. why 
 not be more honest? you had over 10 years of time to develop basic 
 foundations but its still a amateurish attempt at language design. 
 Tell me about another language which is so much work in progress after 
 10 years of development. They are all so stable. If I want I can build 
 a 'E' language and fix all your legacy bugs. D is nowhere near 

 Someone marked it wontfix.

 
 Is it just me, or spam bots suddenly became incredibly clever?

You call that clever? O_o

Stanislav Blinov <stanislav.blinov gmail.com> writes:

 Is it just me, or spam bots suddenly became incredibly clever?

 
 You call that clever? O_o

For a bot. It almost seems as there is some intelligence behind this. 
Well, a little too almost, maybe.

Gareth Charnock <gareth.charnock gmail.com> writes:

On 01/09/10 21:50, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
 Is it just me, or spam bots suddenly became incredibly clever?

 You call that clever? O_o

 For a bot. It almost seems as there is some intelligence behind this.
 Well, a little too almost, maybe.


tempted to file that bug, just so it can get marked wontfix. There's 
something nice and defiant about that.