• Arlen Albert Keshabyan <arlen.albert gmail.com> Sep 24 2007

Arlen Albert Keshabyan <arlen.albert gmail.com> writes:

Stewart Gordon Wrote:

 "Arlen Albert Keshabyan" <arlen.albert gmail.com> wrote in message 
 news:fd6ee0$nd4$1 digitalmars.com...
 Stewart Gordon Wrote:
 "Arlen Albert Keshabyan" <arlen.albert gmail.com> wrote in message
 news:fd68lm$f4r$1 digitalmars.com...
 A a = APointer1 ?? APointer2 ?? APointer3;

 the line above is equal to the line below:

 A a = APointer1 != null ??? APointer2 != null ??? APointer3 != null ???
 null;


 Not by the way you specified it.  The first would assign to a an actual
 object reference; the second would try to assign a boolean value.




 No. The code lines do the same thing anyway.


 Which same thing - evaluating to a boolean or evaluating to an object 
 reference?  Are you going to supply a corrected version of your proposal?
 
 Stewart.
 
 -- 
 My e-mail address is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies 
 on the 'group where everybody may benefit. 
 



It evaluates to an object reference.