www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - Re: Renaming std.conv

reply Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> writes:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
 We haven't reached consensus on where to put enforce() and friends. Any 
 other ideas? Of the above, I like std.checks.
 
 Better yet, how about defining std.exception that includes a host of 
 exception-related functionality (such as defining exceptions that retain 
 file and line, perhaps stack traces etc.)?

The trace functionality already exists in druntime. As for exceptions, they may belong there as well if they're ones the runtime should be aware of.
Jun 28 2010
next sibling parent reply "Rory McGuire" <rmcguire neonova.co.za> writes:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:36:15 +0200, Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org>  
wrote:

 Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
 We haven't reached consensus on where to put enforce() and friends. Any
 other ideas? Of the above, I like std.checks.

 Better yet, how about defining std.exception that includes a host of
 exception-related functionality (such as defining exceptions that retain
 file and line, perhaps stack traces etc.)?

The trace functionality already exists in druntime. As for exceptions, they may belong there as well if they're ones the runtime should be aware of.

How does one get a print out of the stack trace then? Is it a setting or something?
Jun 28 2010
parent reply Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> writes:
Rory McGuire Wrote:

 On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:36:15 +0200, Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org>  
 wrote:
 
 Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
 We haven't reached consensus on where to put enforce() and friends. Any
 other ideas? Of the above, I like std.checks.

 Better yet, how about defining std.exception that includes a host of
 exception-related functionality (such as defining exceptions that retain
 file and line, perhaps stack traces etc.)?

The trace functionality already exists in druntime. As for exceptions, they may belong there as well if they're ones the runtime should be aware of.

How does one get a print out of the stack trace then? Is it a setting or something?

I should qualify my original statement by saying that it's only implemented for Linux and OSX so far. I have some of the declarations in for the Windows implementation but haven't gotten to it yet.
Jun 28 2010
parent Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:
Sean Kelly wrote:
 Rory McGuire Wrote:
 
 On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:36:15 +0200, Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org>  
 wrote:

 Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
 We haven't reached consensus on where to put enforce() and friends. Any
 other ideas? Of the above, I like std.checks.

 Better yet, how about defining std.exception that includes a host of
 exception-related functionality (such as defining exceptions that retain
 file and line, perhaps stack traces etc.)?

they may belong there as well if they're ones the runtime should be aware of.

something?

I should qualify my original statement by saying that it's only implemented for Linux and OSX so far. I have some of the declarations in for the Windows implementation but haven't gotten to it yet.

My stack traces look indecipherable on Ubuntu. They only contain module name and memory address. Andrei
Jun 28 2010
prev sibling parent "Rory McGuire" <rmcguire neonova.co.za> writes:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:01:55 +0200, Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org>  
wrote:

 Rory McGuire Wrote:

 On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:36:15 +0200, Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org>
 wrote:

 Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
 We haven't reached consensus on where to put enforce() and friends.  


 other ideas? Of the above, I like std.checks.

 Better yet, how about defining std.exception that includes a host of
 exception-related functionality (such as defining exceptions that  


 file and line, perhaps stack traces etc.)?

The trace functionality already exists in druntime. As for

 they may belong there as well if they're ones the runtime should be
 aware of.

How does one get a print out of the stack trace then? Is it a setting or something?

I should qualify my original statement by saying that it's only implemented for Linux and OSX so far. I have some of the declarations in for the Windows implementation but haven't gotten to it yet.

Is there a way to get the function name/line? I'm using this on ubuntu 10.04. void fun() { throw new Exception("eeek"); } void main() { fun(); } Output is: object.Exception: eeek ---------------- ../throw() [0x80493a0] ../throw() [0x804ba44] ../throw() [0x804b9a9] ../throw() [0x804ba81] ../throw() [0x804b9a9] ../throw() [0x804b958] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6) [0xf764cbd6] ../throw() [0x80492b1] -Rory
Jun 28 2010