• Katrina Niolet <katrina niolet.name> Jan 15 2009
• Bill Baxter <wbaxter gmail.com> Jan 15 2009
• Eldar Insafutdinov <e.insafutdinov nowhere.com> Jan 15 2009

Katrina Niolet <katrina niolet.name> writes:

Stewart Gordon Wrote:

 Bill Baxter wrote:
 Qt 4.5 to be LGPL
 http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09%2F01%2F14%2F1312210
 
 Now we just need a D port...


 There was Indigo, not exactly a port but a library to mimic Qt's API.
 http://www.dsource.org/projects/indigo/
 
 But that import is incomplete at the moment - I'll have to see what code 
 I still have.  And maybe the project could be resurrected one of these days.
 
 Stewart.


I'd say wait and see how the bindings work out. Long term a D port of Qt would
be great, but it would take several developers years to get any real percentage
of the Qt classes ported, and if the D bindings rock then there is little need
(other than just the desire to have to have Qt in a more modern language)

Katrina

Bill Baxter <wbaxter gmail.com> writes:

On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Katrina Niolet <katrina niolet.name> wrot=
e:
 Stewart Gordon Wrote:

 Bill Baxter wrote:
 Qt 4.5 to be LGPL
 http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=3D09%2F01%2F14%2F1312210

 Now we just need a D port...


 There was Indigo, not exactly a port but a library to mimic Qt's API.
 http://www.dsource.org/projects/indigo/

 But that import is incomplete at the moment - I'll have to see what code
 I still have.  And maybe the project could be resurrected one of these d=




 Stewart.


 I'd say wait and see how the bindings work out. Long term a D port of Qt =


percentage of the Qt classes ported, and if the D bindings rock then there =
is little need (other than just the desire to have to have Qt in a more mod=
ern language)

Is there an irc channel or mailing list or google groups list for
discussions and questions about qtd?


--bb

Eldar Insafutdinov <e.insafutdinov nowhere.com> writes:

Bill Baxter Wrote:

 On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Katrina Niolet <katrina niolet.name> wrote:
 Stewart Gordon Wrote:

 Bill Baxter wrote:
 Qt 4.5 to be LGPL
 http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09%2F01%2F14%2F1312210

 Now we just need a D port...


 There was Indigo, not exactly a port but a library to mimic Qt's API.
 http://www.dsource.org/projects/indigo/

 But that import is incomplete at the moment - I'll have to see what code
 I still have.  And maybe the project could be resurrected one of these days.

 Stewart.


 I'd say wait and see how the bindings work out. Long term a D port of Qt would
be great, but it would take several developers years to get any real percentage
of the Qt classes ported, and if the D bindings rock then there is little need
(other than just the desire to have to have Qt in a more modern language)


 Is there an irc channel or mailing list or google groups list for
 discussions and questions about qtd?
 
 
 --bb


#qtd on FreeNode