digitalmars.D - Re: Phobos/Tango Unification Plans
- Paul D. Anderson <paul.d.removethis.anderson comcast.andthis.net> Oct 13 2008
- Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> Oct 13 2008
- Benji Smith <dlanguage benjismith.net> Oct 13 2008
- John Reimer <terminal.node gmail.com> Oct 13 2008
Benji Smith Wrote:Walter Bright wrote:Benji Smith wrote:John Reimer wrote:Yep, probably best just to be content with the druntime for now... that's a big move in itself ... and a great one. If we demand too much of these guys, they are gonna balk. :-D
If these changes (and others discussed here lately) are going to break a lot of code, is it time to move to 3.0?Oh, don't get me wrong. I think it's a fantastic first step. I was just wondering whether there's a "step two" on the drawing board yet.
Step one is gonna be a doozy!
And I'm sure I speak for us all when I say we *REALLY* appreciate it. Being able to use both libraries will be a huge win. --benji
Oct 13 2008
Paul D. Anderson wrote:Benji Smith Wrote:Walter Bright wrote:Benji Smith wrote:John Reimer wrote:Yep, probably best just to be content with the druntime for now... that's a big move in itself ... and a great one. If we demand too much of these guys, they are gonna balk. :-D
If these changes (and others discussed here lately) are going to break a lot of code, is it time to move to 3.0?
Until D 2.0 is finalized I think it's allowable for code to break between compiler releases. Sean
Oct 13 2008
Paul D. Anderson wrote:Benji Smith Wrote:Walter Bright wrote:Benji Smith wrote:John Reimer wrote:Yep, probably best just to be content with the druntime for now... that's a big move in itself ... and a great one. If we demand too much of these guys, they are gonna balk. :-D
If these changes (and others discussed here lately) are going to break a lot of code, is it time to move to 3.0?
Noooooooooooooooo!!!!
Oct 13 2008
Hello Paul,Benji Smith Wrote:Walter Bright wrote:Benji Smith wrote:John Reimer wrote:Yep, probably best just to be content with the druntime for now... that's a big move in itself ... and a great one. If we demand too much of these guys, they are gonna balk. :-D
a lot of code, is it time to move to 3.0?
I think that just "ups" the complexity. You may have just made a whole bunch of people faint with that suggestion. :-D But I'm assuming you are suggesting that "3.0" respresent the merge of Phobos and Tango? If that's the case, I don't think there need be an incremental version value to represent the change. -JJR
Oct 13 2008