• #ponce <nospam nospam.nospam> Jun 01 2010
• retard <re tard.com.invalid> Jun 01 2010

#ponce <nospam nospam.nospam> writes:

 For example the lambda syntax is terribly verbose in D compared to Scala 
 or Haskell.
 


It may seem surprising to you, but there is a lot of project who can't afford
using Scala or Haskell. 

If you're constrained to use D at your dayjob, imagine what could be to be
forced to use C++. Wonderful hours spent finding that your destructor failed
because it called virtual functions, while your stack trace magically disappear
and you have to wait recompilation for 10 min.

retard <re tard.com.invalid> writes:

Tue, 01 Jun 2010 05:19:55 -0400, #ponce wrote:

 For example the lambda syntax is terribly verbose in D compared to
 Scala or Haskell.
 
 


 afford using Scala or Haskell.
 
 If you're constrained to use D at your dayjob, imagine what could be to
 be forced to use C++. Wonderful hours spent finding that your destructor
 failed because it called virtual functions, while your stack trace
 magically disappear and you have to wait recompilation for 10 min.


The world would be a better place if instead of shooting in your leg you 
shot your client's head off.