digitalmars.D - Re: Ideas from the Chapel language (swap)
- NN (3/23) Oct 06 2007 IMO operator is the best. Otherwise anyone will reinvent the wheel again...
Derek Parnell Wrote:On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:55:05 +0900, Bill Baxter wrote:IMO operator is the best. Otherwise anyone will reinvent the wheel again and again. See C++, there are much of swap functions, and much of nothrowing problem in swap.I find it hard to believe that a compiler couldn't recognize that this is a swap operation: tmp = a; a = b; b = tmp; If it's not harder than I think for some reason, then it's not really needed in the language.Maybe it could, but that's not the point of a programming language. A programming language is for people, not computers, to read. It is whole lot easy to recognise "swap(a,b)" or even "a<->b" as a swapping operation than three lines of code. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia skype: derek.j.parnell
Oct 06 2007