www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - Re: Go: A new system programing language

reply Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> writes:
Walter Bright Wrote:

 Bill Baxter wrote:
 It's harder to find those when you're skimming through trying to get
 the highlights with a 5 minute limit.  :-) What are some things is it
 missing?

Off the top of my head, some major ones: . inline assembler . interface to C

Their definition of "systems programming language" is clearly different from mine then. Shouldn't this classify Java as a systems language as well?
Nov 11 2009
parent Bill Baxter <wbaxter gmail.com> writes:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> wrote:
 Walter Bright Wrote:

 Bill Baxter wrote:
 It's harder to find those when you're skimming through trying to get
 the highlights with a 5 minute limit. =A0:-) What are some things is i=



 missing?

Off the top of my head, some major ones: . inline assembler . interface to C

Their definition of "systems programming language" is clearly different f=

l? I'm starting to think their definition must just be "compiles to native code" maybe together with "has static typing". --bb
Nov 11 2009