digitalmars.D - Re: Escape analysis
- bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> Oct 29 2008
- Sergey Gromov <snake.scaly gmail.com> Oct 29 2008
- Sergey Gromov <snake.scaly gmail.com> Oct 29 2008
- Robert Fraser <fraserofthenight gmail.com> Oct 29 2008
- "Bill Baxter" <wbaxter gmail.com> Oct 29 2008
- "Jarrett Billingsley" <jarrett.billingsley gmail.com> Oct 29 2008
I think C++ designers are fully mad, this shows how to use C++ lambdas: http://blogs.msdn.com/vcblog/archive/2008/10/28/lambdas-auto-and-static-assert-c-0x-features-in-vc10-part-1.aspx If D2 lambdas (and closures) become *half* complex as that I'm going to stop using D on the spot :-) Bye, bearophile
Oct 29 2008
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:46:22 -0400, bearophile wrote:I think C++ designers are fully mad, this shows how to use C++ lambdas: http://blogs.msdn.com/vcblog/archive/2008/10/28/lambdas-auto-and-static-assert-c-0x-features-in-vc10-part-1.aspx If D2 lambdas (and closures) become *half* complex as that I'm going to stop using D on the spot :-)
Well, they're somewhat limited, and a bit manual, and actually just a syntactic sugar, but otherwise they're quite close to D's stack delegates, even in syntax. I couldn't see what scared you that much.
Oct 29 2008
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:06:52 +0900, Bill Baxter wrote:On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Sergey Gromov <snake.scaly gmail.com> wrote:Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:46:22 -0400, bearophile wrote:I think C++ designers are fully mad, this shows how to use C++ lambdas: http://blogs.msdn.com/vcblog/archive/2008/10/28/lambdas-auto-and-static-assert-c-0x-features-in-vc10-part-1.aspx
Anyway, I'm impressed that MS is getting these things into the compiler so quickly. I had expected to see another C99 foot-dragging extravaganza. Guess it just goes to show how little they care about C.
The discussed features are really a significant improvement for C++ productivity. I think a lot of C++ code is still being written by MS so improving productivity here should be a priority for them. I wonder if there are any chances for typeof() in C++.
Oct 29 2008
Bill Baxter wrote:Anyway, I'm impressed that MS is getting these things into the compiler so quickly. I had expected to see another C99 foot-dragging extravaganza. Guess it just goes to show how little they care about C.
C++ is a .NET language now ;-P
Oct 29 2008
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Sergey Gromov <snake.scaly gmail.com> wrote:Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:46:22 -0400, bearophile wrote:I think C++ designers are fully mad, this shows how to use C++ lambdas: http://blogs.msdn.com/vcblog/archive/2008/10/28/lambdas-auto-and-static-assert-c-0x-features-in-vc10-part-1.aspx If D2 lambdas (and closures) become *half* complex as that I'm going to stop using D on the spot :-)
Well, they're somewhat limited, and a bit manual, and actually just a syntactic sugar, but otherwise they're quite close to D's stack delegates, even in syntax. I couldn't see what scared you that much.
I think it's mostly the capture mode [] stuff that's a bit ugly. I think this is a legal lambda: [=,this,&x,&y](int& r) mutable { ... } Anyway, I'm impressed that MS is getting these things into the compiler so quickly. I had expected to see another C99 foot-dragging extravaganza. Guess it just goes to show how little they care about C. --bb
Oct 29 2008
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Sergey Gromov <snake.scaly gmail.com> wrote:I wonder if there are any chances for typeof() in C++.
It's called decltype().
Oct 29 2008