• "H. S. Teoh" <hsteoh quickfur.ath.cx> Aug 23 2013

"H. S. Teoh" <hsteoh quickfur.ath.cx> writes:

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 03:48:59PM +0200, Maxim Fomin wrote:
 On Friday, 23 August 2013 at 11:30:01 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
I see Andrei running away !


 So far, this is the best description of current situation regarding
 allocators.


lol... seriously though, when *are* we going to get working allocators?
I mean, right now we don't even have a concrete proposal that we can
destroy. And we've been talking about allocators for how many years now?


On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 04:31:54PM +0200, Brian Rogoff wrote:
[...]
 Has anyone tried porting an existing allocator library from C++?
 Looking over the dconf proceedings, HeapLayers was mentioned as an
 inspiration for a future D allocators library; would a port make
 sense?


IIRC, we didn't want to follow C++'s implementation, which in practice
is troublesome to use and usually avoided. But what should replace it,
isn't all that clear.


 I remember seeing a D2 region allocator, but it appeared to be
 abandonware.
 
 Assuming you have a really great allocator library, how would that
 work with the existing GC requiring features of D? For example,
 could you have all of your slicing, classes, exceptions, etc.
 handled by a region allocator?



I suspect the elusive answers to these questions are what's keeping
Andrei on the run. ;-)


T

-- 
Frank disagreement binds closer than feigned agreement.