digitalmars.D - Re: About switch case statements...
- bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> Nov 15 2009
- KennyTM~ <kennytm gmail.com> Nov 15 2009
- bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> Nov 15 2009
Andrei Alexandrescu:Walter's answer to that has put me to silence for good. "But I use fall-through all the time!" I then knew the feature will never make it.
We can add a third type of switch to D, that's safer... Bye, bearophile
Nov 15 2009
On Nov 16, 09 02:36, bearophile wrote:Andrei Alexandrescu:Walter's answer to that has put me to silence for good. "But I use fall-through all the time!" I then knew the feature will never make it.
We can add a third type of switch to D, that's safer... Bye, bearophile
safe switch ? :p
Nov 15 2009
KennyTM~:safe switch ? :p
That's cute. But I was thinking of a safer "caseof" used by default, and the less safe C switch used only for C compatibility :-) (" unsafe switch" is not possible because it's against D purposes). Bye, bearophile
Nov 15 2009