digitalmars.D - [RFC] Modules for processes manipulation
- Denis Shelomovskij (28/28) Nov 25 2012 I'd like to see in D something like .Net's `System.Diagnostics.Process`
- =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBSw7hubmUgUGV0ZXJzZW4=?= (6/31) Nov 26 2012 See: https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/tree/new-std-process
- Denis Shelomovskij (6/7) Nov 26 2012 Yes, I know about it. That's one of the reasons my code doesn't contain
I'd like to see in D something like .Net's `System.Diagnostics.Process` and friends. Reasons: * .Net's API looks really good and user friendly Consider these processes manipulation modules: http://denis-sh.github.com/hooking/hooking.windows.process.html and hooking.windows.{thread|processmemory|processstartinfo} Differences from .Net's: * RAII (i.e. no handle leaking) * do not cache process properties (see Appendix) * able to launch with argument strings array, not only command line * able to work with process memory Tip: a good way to to access current process memory without `Exception`s thrown on failure instead of `Error`s. Currently it misses some features and is Windows-only. So the questions are: * Should I add missed features for Windows realisation (i.e. is it needed)? * Should I create a cross-platform realisation (i.e. is it needed)? * Will it be possibly accepted in Phobos? Appendix about .Net's `Process`: All properties are cached. And it is documented only in MSDN article about `Refresh` member function. So one has to remember this fact and be careful with this tricky .Net. E.g. one shouldn't believe words like "representing the operating system threads currently running in the associated process" from `Threads` property docs and remember it's cached. -- Денис В. Шеломовский Denis V. Shelomovskij
Nov 25 2012
On 26-11-2012 08:02, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:I'd like to see in D something like .Net's `System.Diagnostics.Process` and friends. Reasons: * .Net's API looks really good and user friendly Consider these processes manipulation modules: http://denis-sh.github.com/hooking/hooking.windows.process.html and hooking.windows.{thread|processmemory|processstartinfo} Differences from .Net's: * RAII (i.e. no handle leaking) * do not cache process properties (see Appendix) * able to launch with argument strings array, not only command line * able to work with process memory Tip: a good way to to access current process memory without `Exception`s thrown on failure instead of `Error`s. Currently it misses some features and is Windows-only. So the questions are: * Should I add missed features for Windows realisation (i.e. is it needed)? * Should I create a cross-platform realisation (i.e. is it needed)? * Will it be possibly accepted in Phobos? Appendix about .Net's `Process`: All properties are cached. And it is documented only in MSDN article about `Refresh` member function. So one has to remember this fact and be careful with this tricky .Net. E.g. one shouldn't believe words like "representing the operating system threads currently running in the associated process" from `Threads` property docs and remember it's cached.See: https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/tree/new-std-process -- Alex Rønne Petersen alex lycus.org http://lycus.org
Nov 26 2012
26.11.2012 17:13, Alex Rønne Petersen пишет:See: https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/tree/new-std-processYes, I know about it. That's one of the reasons my code doesn't contain any stream redirection as I hope we may join work. -- Денис В. Шеломовский Denis V. Shelomovskij
Nov 26 2012