• Vladimir Panteleev (6/6) Feb 08 2013 Some questions about the default DFLAGS settings in Phobos and
• Vladimir Panteleev (4/5) Feb 08 2013 I just remembered that -gs with -O -lib causes an ICE:
• David Nadlinger (13/20) Feb 08 2013 Just to get some extra feedback: LDC currently ships with 2
• Jacob Carlborg (5/14) Feb 08 2013 I think that's good approach. The use can always remove/change the
• Marco Leise (7/23) Feb 08 2013 Yes, there are flags for practically everything, from

"Vladimir Panteleev" <vladimir thecybershadow.net> writes:

Some questions about the default DFLAGS settings in Phobos and 
Druntime makefiles:

1. Why is -g or -gc not used? Are there any situations where the 
presence of debug information in the static library undesirable?

2. Why is -inline not used in Phobos?

3. Any reason why -gs is not used?

"Vladimir Panteleev" <vladimir thecybershadow.net> writes:

On Friday, 8 February 2013 at 09:24:26 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
wrote:
 3. Any reason why -gs is not used?

I just remembered that -gs with -O -lib causes an ICE:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9261

"David Nadlinger" <see klickverbot.at> writes:

On Friday, 8 February 2013 at 09:24:26 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
wrote:
 Some questions about the default DFLAGS settings in Phobos and 
 Druntime makefiles:

 1. Why is -g or -gc not used? Are there any situations where 
 the presence of debug information in the static library 
 undesirable?

 2. Why is -inline not used in Phobos?

 3. Any reason why -gs is not used?

Just to get some extra feedback: LDC currently ships with 2 
versions of the standard library, a release one built with the 
equivalent of "-O -release -inline", and a debug one built with 
"-g".

The debug one is set as "-debuglib" and thus automatically used 
every time the user compiles their code with "-g", which could 
lead to some unnecessary slowdowns, as not every time you want to 
debug into the standard library code. On the other hand, you 
typically _do_ want to have the assertions in the standard 
library turned on when you debug your own code, so...

David

Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> writes:

On 2013-02-08 14:39, David Nadlinger wrote:

 Just to get some extra feedback: LDC currently ships with 2 versions of
 the standard library, a release one built with the equivalent of "-O
 -release -inline", and a debug one built with "-g".

 The debug one is set as "-debuglib" and thus automatically used every
 time the user compiles their code with "-g", which could lead to some
 unnecessary slowdowns, as not every time you want to debug into the
 standard library code. On the other hand, you typically _do_ want to
 have the assertions in the standard library turned on when you debug
 your own code, so...

I think that's good approach. The use can always remove/change the 
-debuglib flag if necessary, right?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

Marco Leise <Marco.Leise gmx.de> writes:

Am Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:02:14 +0100
schrieb Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com>:

 On 2013-02-08 14:39, David Nadlinger wrote:
 
 Just to get some extra feedback: LDC currently ships with 2 versions of
 the standard library, a release one built with the equivalent of "-O
 -release -inline", and a debug one built with "-g".

 The debug one is set as "-debuglib" and thus automatically used every
 time the user compiles their code with "-g", which could lead to some
 unnecessary slowdowns, as not every time you want to debug into the
 standard library code. On the other hand, you typically _do_ want to
 have the assertions in the standard library turned on when you debug
 your own code, so...

 
 I think that's good approach. The use can always remove/change the 
 -debuglib flag if necessary, right?
 

Yes, there are flags for practically everything, from
overriding the standard library to removing function post
condition checks.

-- 
Marco