• Shammah Chancellor (3/3) Nov 22 2013 Can we split things like range.d into a package module? This should
• Mike Parker (2/5) Nov 22 2013 +1
• H. S. Teoh (13/20) Nov 22 2013 I think splitting big Phobos modules up is pretty much a given. All it

Shammah Chancellor <anonymous coward.com> writes:

Can we split things like range.d into a package module?  This should 
not break code now, correct?   Range.d is already 8000 LOC and 
presumably will grow as more ranges are added to phobos.

Mike Parker <aldacron gmail.com> writes:

On 11/23/2013 8:02 AM, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
 Can we split things like range.d into a package module?  This should not
 break code now, correct?   Range.d is already 8000 LOC and presumably
 will grow as more ranges are added to phobos.

+1

"H. S. Teoh" <hsteoh quickfur.ath.cx> writes:

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 04:44:29PM +0900, Mike Parker wrote:
 On 11/23/2013 8:02 AM, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
Can we split things like range.d into a package module?  This should
not break code now, correct?   Range.d is already 8000 LOC and
presumably will grow as more ranges are added to phobos.

 
 +1

I think splitting big Phobos modules up is pretty much a given. All it
takes is for somebody to submit a pull request to actually implement it.
(And survive the inevitable bikeshedding flamewar over the naming of the
submodules. But that's a given. :P)

Jonathan is already working on std.datetime, one of the Phobos
heavyweights; std.algorithm is the next big heavyweight for whoever
wishes to tackle it. Probably std.range is another heavyweight
candidate.

So, let's see the pull requests.


T

-- 
Verbing weirds language. -- Calvin (& Hobbes)