• Walter Bright (2/2) Jul 27 2014 http://x64dbg.com/#start
• Vladimir Panteleev (6/8) Jul 27 2014 It looks like an open-source clone of OllyDbg. Looking at the
• francesco cattoglio (4/13) Jul 27 2014 Yep, I have to agree.
• Martin Krejcirik (5/8) Jul 27 2014 It should be usable, if you convert your debug information to PDB
• John Colvin (2/11) Jul 27 2014 It does make for a nice disassembler though :)
• Walter Bright (2/10) Jul 27 2014 It did mention PDB on one page. But not Codeview.

Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> writes:

http://x64dbg.com/#start

Anyone want to give this a whirl?

"Vladimir Panteleev" <vladimir thecybershadow.net> writes:

On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 19:07:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
 http://x64dbg.com/#start

 Anyone want to give this a whirl?

It looks like an open-source clone of OllyDbg. Looking at the 
advertised features, it seems to be aimed at reverse engineering, 
as I see no mention of source-level debugging, or any supported 
debug information formats. I'd guess that it would not be great 
at debugging your own programs.

"francesco cattoglio" <francesco.cattoglio gmail.com> writes:

On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 20:39:53 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
 On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 19:07:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
 http://x64dbg.com/#start

 Anyone want to give this a whirl?

 It looks like an open-source clone of OllyDbg. Looking at the 
 advertised features, it seems to be aimed at reverse 
 engineering, as I see no mention of source-level debugging, or 
 any supported debug information formats. I'd guess that it 
 would not be great at debugging your own programs.

Yep, I have to agree.
Or well, probably it's good enough for Walter, but I would be 
utterly unable to debug even 50 lines of code with that :-P

"Martin Krejcirik" <mk-junk i-line.cz> writes:

On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 20:50:14 UTC, francesco cattoglio 
wrote:
 Yep, I have to agree.
 Or well, probably it's good enough for Walter, but I would be 
 utterly unable to debug even 50 lines of code with that :-P

It should be usable, if you convert your debug information to PDB 
format using cv2pdb tool. At least ollydbg shows the source 
correctly.

"John Colvin" <john.loughran.colvin gmail.com> writes:

On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 20:39:53 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
 On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 19:07:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
 http://x64dbg.com/#start

 Anyone want to give this a whirl?

 It looks like an open-source clone of OllyDbg. Looking at the 
 advertised features, it seems to be aimed at reverse 
 engineering, as I see no mention of source-level debugging, or 
 any supported debug information formats. I'd guess that it 
 would not be great at debugging your own programs.

It does make for a nice disassembler though :)

Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> writes:

On 7/27/2014 1:39 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
 On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 19:07:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
 http://x64dbg.com/#start

 Anyone want to give this a whirl?

 It looks like an open-source clone of OllyDbg. Looking at the advertised
 features, it seems to be aimed at reverse engineering, as I see no mention of
 source-level debugging, or any supported debug information formats. I'd guess
 that it would not be great at debugging your own programs.

It did mention PDB on one page. But not Codeview.