digitalmars.D - [OT] Broken newsgroup threads in Thunderbird 3?
- Lionello Lunesu (12/12) Dec 05 2009 Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On my
- Walter Bright (2/3) Dec 05 2009 I use thunderbird 2.0.0.23 and am not having a problem here.
- Lionello Lunesu (3/7) Dec 06 2009 It was OK in 2.0 here too, so I thought it might have something to do
- Ellery Newcomer (3/15) Dec 05 2009 I'm on 3 beta and I haven't noticed an unusual amount top level REs.
- Ellery Newcomer (2/20) Dec 06 2009 cripes, speak of the devil
- Phil Deets (3/6) Dec 05 2009 I use Opera 10.10 and this happens to me too.
- BLS (4/7) Dec 06 2009 Yeah, exactly the same problem. 2.x worked fine.
- Bernard Helyer (3/15) Dec 06 2009 With rc1 I had this problem, but rc2 has (touch wood) seemed to have
- Lionello Lunesu (2/4) Dec 06 2009 rc2! yeey!
- MikeyMoose (3/7) Dec 15 2009 I'm getting that as well. Started when I upgraded to 3.0.
- Robert Clipsham (5/12) Dec 15 2009 Same issue here, I don't know if it's because the posters are using
- retard (5/21) Dec 15 2009 Probably the previous versions of Thunderbird somehow inferred the
- Alix Pexton (5/26) Dec 16 2009 I did a bit of googling and found this page,
- Alix Pexton (3/31) Dec 16 2009 Hmn, doesn't seem to have worked, damn ><
- jpf (43/48) Dec 16 2009 I just had a quick look at the headers of the broken messages and they
Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On my laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread appear as new top-level posts. When I first started using Thunderbird 3 beta this happened in my IMAP folder as well, but I was able to fix that by setting mail.strict_threading to false in the config editor. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find a similar setting for controlling threading behavior for the news reader. Is this a bug in Thunderbird 3 beta/RC, or are those posts simply broken, because of a broken web interface or something like that? Or is there a problem with the news server? L.
Dec 05 2009
Lionello Lunesu wrote:Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC?I use thunderbird 2.0.0.23 and am not having a problem here.
Dec 05 2009
On 6-12-2009 11:24, Walter Bright wrote:Lionello Lunesu wrote:It was OK in 2.0 here too, so I thought it might have something to do with 3.0Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC?I use thunderbird 2.0.0.23 and am not having a problem here.
Dec 06 2009
On 12/05/2009 08:21 PM, Lionello Lunesu wrote:Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On my laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread appear as new top-level posts. When I first started using Thunderbird 3 beta this happened in my IMAP folder as well, but I was able to fix that by setting mail.strict_threading to false in the config editor. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find a similar setting for controlling threading behavior for the news reader. Is this a bug in Thunderbird 3 beta/RC, or are those posts simply broken, because of a broken web interface or something like that? Or is there a problem with the news server? L.I'm on 3 beta and I haven't noticed an unusual amount top level REs. But yeah, there's something wonky about the news server
Dec 05 2009
On 12/05/2009 09:28 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:On 12/05/2009 08:21 PM, Lionello Lunesu wrote:cripes, speak of the devilIs anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On my laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread appear as new top-level posts. When I first started using Thunderbird 3 beta this happened in my IMAP folder as well, but I was able to fix that by setting mail.strict_threading to false in the config editor. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find a similar setting for controlling threading behavior for the news reader. Is this a bug in Thunderbird 3 beta/RC, or are those posts simply broken, because of a broken web interface or something like that? Or is there a problem with the news server? L.I'm on 3 beta and I haven't noticed an unusual amount top level REs. But yeah, there's something wonky about the news server
Dec 06 2009
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:21:57 -0500, Lionello Lunesu <lio lunesu.remove.com> wrote:On my laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread appear as new top-level posts.I use Opera 10.10 and this happens to me too.
Dec 05 2009
On 06/12/2009 03:21, Lionello Lunesu wrote:Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On my laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread appear as new top-level posts.Yeah, exactly the same problem. 2.x worked fine. also the tabbed view drives me crazy, will switch back to 2. Björn
Dec 06 2009
On 06/12/09 15:21, Lionello Lunesu wrote:Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On my laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread appear as new top-level posts. When I first started using Thunderbird 3 beta this happened in my IMAP folder as well, but I was able to fix that by setting mail.strict_threading to false in the config editor. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find a similar setting for controlling threading behavior for the news reader. Is this a bug in Thunderbird 3 beta/RC, or are those posts simply broken, because of a broken web interface or something like that? Or is there a problem with the news server? L.With rc1 I had this problem, but rc2 has (touch wood) seemed to have ironed out the kinks.
Dec 06 2009
On 6-12-2009 19:45, Bernard Helyer wrote:With rc1 I had this problem, but rc2 has (touch wood) seemed to have ironed out the kinks.rc2! yeey!
Dec 06 2009
Lionello Lunesu Wrote:Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On my laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread appear as new top-level posts.I'm getting that as well. Started when I upgraded to 3.0. m
Dec 15 2009
On 15/12/09 22:25, MikeyMoose wrote:Lionello Lunesu Wrote:Same issue here, I don't know if it's because the posters are using Thunderbird 3 or because it's not laying out threads properly, or even if the server's at fault and Thunderbird 2 relied on buggy behaviour... I guess we'll see if this post becomes top level (Posted using TB3).Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On my laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread appear as new top-level posts.I'm getting that as well. Started when I upgraded to 3.0. m
Dec 15 2009
Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:16:05 +0000, Robert Clipsham wrote:On 15/12/09 22:25, MikeyMoose wrote:Probably the previous versions of Thunderbird somehow inferred the correct thread even when the post was sent with a broken client. Some posts seem to erroneously become top level no matter what client I use. This whole mess started when the web interface was introduced.Lionello Lunesu Wrote:Same issue here, I don't know if it's because the posters are using Thunderbird 3 or because it's not laying out threads properly, or even if the server's at fault and Thunderbird 2 relied on buggy behaviour... I guess we'll see if this post becomes top level (Posted using TB3).Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On my laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread appear as new top-level posts.I'm getting that as well. Started when I upgraded to 3.0. m
Dec 15 2009
On 15/12/2009 23:30, retard wrote:Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:16:05 +0000, Robert Clipsham wrote:I did a bit of googling and found this page, http://www.pythian.com/news/4205/testing-thunderbird-3-what-to-do-if-it-shreds-your-threads/ I'm about to try it, fingers crossed ^^ A...On 15/12/09 22:25, MikeyMoose wrote:Probably the previous versions of Thunderbird somehow inferred the correct thread even when the post was sent with a broken client. Some posts seem to erroneously become top level no matter what client I use. This whole mess started when the web interface was introduced.Lionello Lunesu Wrote:Same issue here, I don't know if it's because the posters are using Thunderbird 3 or because it's not laying out threads properly, or even if the server's at fault and Thunderbird 2 relied on buggy behaviour... I guess we'll see if this post becomes top level (Posted using TB3).Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On my laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread appear as new top-level posts.I'm getting that as well. Started when I upgraded to 3.0. m
Dec 16 2009
On 16/12/2009 11:05, Alix Pexton wrote:On 15/12/2009 23:30, retard wrote:Hmn, doesn't seem to have worked, damn >< A...Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:16:05 +0000, Robert Clipsham wrote:I did a bit of googling and found this page, http://www.pythian.com/news/4205/testing-thunderbird-3-what-to-do-if-it-shreds-your-threads/ I'm about to try it, fingers crossed ^^ A...On 15/12/09 22:25, MikeyMoose wrote:Probably the previous versions of Thunderbird somehow inferred the correct thread even when the post was sent with a broken client. Some posts seem to erroneously become top level no matter what client I use. This whole mess started when the web interface was introduced.Lionello Lunesu Wrote:Same issue here, I don't know if it's because the posters are using Thunderbird 3 or because it's not laying out threads properly, or even if the server's at fault and Thunderbird 2 relied on buggy behaviour... I guess we'll see if this post becomes top level (Posted using TB3).Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On my laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread appear as new top-level posts.I'm getting that as well. Started when I upgraded to 3.0. m
Dec 16 2009
On 16.12.2009 00:30, retard wrote:Probably the previous versions of Thunderbird somehow inferred the correct thread even when the post was sent with a broken client. Some posts seem to erroneously become top level no matter what client I use. This whole mess started when the web interface was introduced.I just had a quick look at the headers of the broken messages and they were indeed all send with the webnews client. It seems like the webnews client doesn't set the 'References' header for those messages. Strangely most messages posted with webnews have the references header set though, I don't know why it sometimes doesn't work. Header examples: Webnews, bad threading Path: digitalmars.com!not-for-mail From: /removed/ Newsgroups: digitalmars.D Subject: Re: transporting qualifier from parameter to the return value Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:48:54 -0500 Organization: Digital Mars Lines: 37 Message-ID: <hgaog6$89p$1 digitalmars.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: digitalmars.com 1260971334 8505 65.204.18.200 (16 Dec 2009 13:48:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet digitalmars.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:48:54 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Web-News v.1.6.3 (by Terence Yim) Xref: digitalmars.com digitalmars.D:103651 Opera, working threading Path: digitalmars.com!not-for-mail From: /removed/ Newsgroups: digitalmars.D Subject: Re: transporting qualifier from parameter to the return value Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:41:19 -0500 Organization: Digital Mars Lines: 47 Message-ID: <op.u40hu5yeeav7ka localhost.localdomain> *References: <hg9il4$ada$1 digitalmars.com>* Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: digitalmars.com 1260934881 15220 76.119.224.220 (16 Dec 2009 03:41:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet digitalmars.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:41:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (Linux) Xref: digitalmars.com digitalmars.D:103611
Dec 16 2009