• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alex_R=F8nne_Petersen?= (6/6) Dec 27 2011 Hi,
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alex_R=F8nne_Petersen?= (5/11) Dec 27 2011 In addition, we may want to have "HardFloat" and "SoftFloat"

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alex_R=F8nne_Petersen?= <xtzgzorex gmail.com> writes:

Hi,

I think it would be useful if we had a standard version identifier that 
is defined when no floating point support is enabled (i.e. dmd's 
-nofloat switch), say, "NoFloat" or something along the lines of that.

Any input on this before I put it in Bugzilla?

- Alex

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alex_R=F8nne_Petersen?= <xtzgzorex gmail.com> writes:

On 27-12-2011 19:47, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
 Hi,

 I think it would be useful if we had a standard version identifier that
 is defined when no floating point support is enabled (i.e. dmd's
 -nofloat switch), say, "NoFloat" or something along the lines of that.

 Any input on this before I put it in Bugzilla?

 - Alex

In addition, we may want to have "HardFloat" and "SoftFloat" 
standardized too, as some compilers (GDC and LDC) support soft float on 
ARM. DMD would just define "HardFloat" when -nofloat isn't activated.

- Alex