• Moinak Bhattacharrya (7/7) Jul 18 2017 Is it possible to mixin function names? IE something like this:
• Moinak Bhattacharrya (3/10) Jul 18 2017 Or, just something like this for any variable name.
• Adam D. Ruppe (7/8) Jul 18 2017 Only if you mixin the entire function.
• Timon Gehr (4/13) Jul 18 2017 The suggestion has been made, but there was no extensive discussion so f...
• Moinak Bhattacharrya (3/17) Jul 18 2017 That's the DIP for static foreach. Is there a separate DIP for
• Timon Gehr (2/24) Jul 18 2017 Not yet.
• Moinak Bhattacharrya (3/28) Jul 18 2017 :( I might look into making one, then. This feature would scratch

Moinak Bhattacharrya <moinakb001 gmail.com> writes:

Is it possible to mixin function names? IE something like this:

template strFunc(string s){
	int mixin(s)(int a){
		return a+1;
	}
}

If not, is something like this being looked at?

Moinak Bhattacharrya <moinakb001 gmail.com> writes:

On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 20:57:51 UTC, Moinak Bhattacharrya 
wrote:
 Is it possible to mixin function names? IE something like this:

 template strFunc(string s){
 	int mixin(s)(int a){
 		return a+1;
 	}
 }

 If not, is something like this being looked at?

Or, just something like this for any variable name.

Adam D. Ruppe <destructionator gmail.com> writes:

On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 20:57:51 UTC, Moinak Bhattacharrya 
wrote:
 Is it possible to mixin function names? IE something like this:

Only if you mixin the entire function.

But what I like to do is to write the function with some internal 
name, then do `mixin("alias "~ new_name ~ " = 
your_internal_name;");` so it is available as new name but still 
written normally.

Timon Gehr <timon.gehr gmx.ch> writes:

On 18.07.2017 22:57, Moinak Bhattacharrya wrote:
 Is it possible to mixin function names? IE something like this:
 
 template strFunc(string s){
      int mixin(s)(int a){
          return a+1;
      }
 }
 ...

No.

 If not, is something like this being looked at?

The suggestion has been made, but there was no extensive discussion so far.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1010.md#mixin-identifiers

Moinak Bhattacharrya <moinakb001 gmail.com> writes:

On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 21:22:47 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
 On 18.07.2017 22:57, Moinak Bhattacharrya wrote:
 Is it possible to mixin function names? IE something like this:
 
 template strFunc(string s){
      int mixin(s)(int a){
          return a+1;
      }
 }
 ...

 No.

 If not, is something like this being looked at?

 The suggestion has been made, but there was no extensive 
 discussion so far.
 https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1010.md#mixin-identifiers

That's the DIP for static foreach. Is there a separate DIP for 
mixin identifiers?

Timon Gehr <timon.gehr gmx.ch> writes:

On 18.07.2017 23:28, Moinak Bhattacharrya wrote:
 On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 21:22:47 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
 On 18.07.2017 22:57, Moinak Bhattacharrya wrote:
 Is it possible to mixin function names? IE something like this:

 template strFunc(string s){
      int mixin(s)(int a){
          return a+1;
      }
 }
 ...

 No.

 If not, is something like this being looked at?

 The suggestion has been made, but there was no extensive discussion so 
 far.
 https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1010.md#mixin-identifiers 

 
 That's the DIP for static foreach. Is there a separate DIP for mixin 
 identifiers?

Not yet.

Moinak Bhattacharrya <moinakb001 gmail.com> writes:

On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 21:29:05 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
 On 18.07.2017 23:28, Moinak Bhattacharrya wrote:
 On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 21:22:47 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
 On 18.07.2017 22:57, Moinak Bhattacharrya wrote:
 Is it possible to mixin function names? IE something like 
 this:

 template strFunc(string s){
      int mixin(s)(int a){
          return a+1;
      }
 }
 ...

 No.

 If not, is something like this being looked at?

 The suggestion has been made, but there was no extensive 
 discussion so far.
 https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1010.md#mixin-identifiers

 
 That's the DIP for static foreach. Is there a separate DIP for 
 mixin identifiers?

 Not yet.

:( I might look into making one, then. This feature would scratch 
a rather sizable itch.