digitalmars.D - Methods require no parantheses
- Stian Pedersen (12/12) Apr 20 2012 Why is this possible? Just had a bug because of it. Would be
- =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBSw7hubmUgUGV0ZXJzZW4=?= (4/16) Apr 20 2012 Just build with -property.
- Jonathan M Davis (11/26) Apr 20 2012 It predates @property. Previously, there was no @property, and pretty mu...
- Stian Pedersen (2/2) Apr 20 2012 Sounds good. Not always funny having to support backwards
Why is this possible? Just had a bug because of it. Would be preferable that you have to state property. From what I can see the property is optional. int main(string[] argv) { int a() { return 1; } int b = a; return 0; }
Apr 20 2012
On 21-04-2012 05:26, Stian Pedersen wrote:Why is this possible? Just had a bug because of it. Would be preferable that you have to state property. From what I can see the property is optional. int main(string[] argv) { int a() { return 1; } int b = a; return 0; }Just build with -property. -- - Alex
Apr 20 2012
On Saturday, April 21, 2012 05:26:21 Stian Pedersen wrote:Why is this possible? Just had a bug because of it. Would be preferable that you have to state property. From what I can see the property is optional. int main(string[] argv) { int a() { return 1; } int b = a; return 0; }It predates property. Previously, there was no property, and pretty much any function which would qualify as a property function colud be called with or without parens. Eventually, only functions which are marked property will be able to be called without parens, and all functions with property will _have_ to be called without parens. But that's being phased in rather than being changed immediately and breaking a lot of existing code (it also gives the compiler the chance to get its property enforcement bugs ironed out). For now, if you compile with -property, that will enable strict property enforcement. Later, it will always be enforced, but not yet. - Jonathan M Davis
Apr 20 2012
Sounds good. Not always funny having to support backwards compatibility.
Apr 20 2012