• rsw0x (2/2) Jun 27 2015 Does anyone know of any GC intensive D programs that can
• deadalnix (4/6) Jun 28 2015 I'm not sure what you mean by GC intensive. Most of high perf D
• rsw0x (3/9) Jun 28 2015 this is precisely the issue I'm having finding any GC intensive D
• Nick Sabalausky (2/7) Jun 28 2015 Just port something from Java ;)
• Jacob Carlborg (5/6) Jun 29 2015 Yeah, SWT is already ported as DWT [1].
• Nikolay (3/5) Jun 28 2015 I think you can use big text file and Word Count sample from
• rsw0x (5/10) Jun 28 2015 Sorry, should have been a bit more clear. I'm looking for real
• thedeemon (11/15) Jun 28 2015 Here's mine, although it hasn't been updated for a year:
• ZombineDev (5/7) Jun 29 2015 DDMD :D You would have to do some digging to get it working with
• John Colvin (4/6) Jun 29 2015 https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks contains some pretty
• rsw0x (4/10) Jun 29 2015 The problem with benchmarks optimized for D is that they
• John Colvin (3/14) Jun 30 2015 If you take a look at the code you'll see that they often
• Abdulhaq (3/5) Jun 29 2015 I remember Maxime said that the Higgs compiler was gc intensive

"rsw0x" <anonymous anonymous.com> writes:

Does anyone know of any GC intensive D programs that can 
preferably be ran with little to no setup?

"deadalnix" <deadalnix gmail.com> writes:

On Sunday, 28 June 2015 at 01:41:53 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
 Does anyone know of any GC intensive D programs that can 
 preferably be ran with little to no setup?

I'm not sure what you mean by GC intensive. Most of high perf D 
programs would have been optimized to reduce GC usage to begin 
with.

"rsw0x" <anonymous anonymous.com> writes:

On Sunday, 28 June 2015 at 22:29:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
 On Sunday, 28 June 2015 at 01:41:53 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
 Does anyone know of any GC intensive D programs that can 
 preferably be ran with little to no setup?

 I'm not sure what you mean by GC intensive. Most of high perf D 
 programs would have been optimized to reduce GC usage to begin 
 with.

this is precisely the issue I'm having finding any GC intensive D 
programs.

Nick Sabalausky <SeeWebsiteToContactMe semitwist.com> writes:

On 06/28/2015 06:37 PM, rsw0x wrote:
 On Sunday, 28 June 2015 at 22:29:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
 I'm not sure what you mean by GC intensive. Most of high perf D
 programs would have been optimized to reduce GC usage to begin with.

 this is precisely the issue I'm having finding any GC intensive D programs.

Just port something from Java ;)

Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> writes:

On 29/06/15 01:40, Nick Sabalausky wrote:

 Just port something from Java ;)

Yeah, SWT is already ported as DWT [1].

[1] https://github.com/d-widget-toolkit/dwt

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

"Nikolay" <sibnick gmail.com> writes:

On Sunday, 28 June 2015 at 01:41:53 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
 Does anyone know of any GC intensive D programs that can 
 preferably be ran with little to no setup?

I think you can use big text file and Word Count sample from 
official site: http://dlang.org/wc.html

"rsw0x" <anonymous anonymous.com> writes:

On Monday, 29 June 2015 at 04:09:19 UTC, Nikolay wrote:
 On Sunday, 28 June 2015 at 01:41:53 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
 Does anyone know of any GC intensive D programs that can 
 preferably be ran with little to no setup?

 I think you can use big text file and Word Count sample from 
 official site: http://dlang.org/wc.html

Sorry, should have been a bit more clear. I'm looking for real 
world D programs to help collect statistics.

At the moment I'm using Higgs but I'm pretty sure a lot of effort 
has gone into avoiding the GC in Higgs.

"thedeemon" <dlang thedeemon.com> writes:

On Monday, 29 June 2015 at 04:19:04 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
 Does anyone know of any GC intensive D programs that can 
 preferably be ran with little to no setup?


 Sorry, should have been a bit more clear. I'm looking for real 
 world D programs to help collect statistics.

Here's mine, although it hasn't been updated for a year:
https://bitbucket.org/infognition/undup
It creates a lot of small objects in GC heap when it makes a 
drive scan. Due to some conservativeness of D GC and 
interlinkedness of object graph in this program, GC couldn't free 
memory properly and I had to make the process restart after user 
ends working with one set of data (drive scan) and returns to 
main window.

It's a GUI tool for Windows, you won't build it on other OSs. 
Works fine in Wine on Linux though.

"ZombineDev" <valid_email he.re> writes:

On Sunday, 28 June 2015 at 01:41:53 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
 Does anyone know of any GC intensive D programs that can 
 preferably be ran with little to no setup?

DDMD :D You would have to do some digging to get it working with 
the GC, but a combined compilation of phobos + some CTFE heavy 
project (eg something that uses ctRegex a lot) would be highly 
stressful to any GC.

"John Colvin" <john.loughran.colvin gmail.com> writes:

On Sunday, 28 June 2015 at 01:41:53 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
 Does anyone know of any GC intensive D programs that can 
 preferably be ran with little to no setup?

https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks contains some pretty 
GC-heavy code, although a lot of the slowness is actually from 
the AA implementation.

"rsw0x" <anonymous anonymous.com> writes:

On Monday, 29 June 2015 at 09:35:08 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
 On Sunday, 28 June 2015 at 01:41:53 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
 Does anyone know of any GC intensive D programs that can 
 preferably be ran with little to no setup?

 https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks contains some pretty 
 GC-heavy code, although a lot of the slowness is actually from 
 the AA implementation.

The problem with benchmarks optimized for D is that they 
generally make little to no allocations, which makes them a bad 
candidate for memory allocation statistics.

"John Colvin" <john.loughran.colvin gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 29 June 2015 at 21:53:37 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
 On Monday, 29 June 2015 at 09:35:08 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
 On Sunday, 28 June 2015 at 01:41:53 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
 Does anyone know of any GC intensive D programs that can 
 preferably be ran with little to no setup?

 https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks contains some pretty 
 GC-heavy code, although a lot of the slowness is actually from 
 the AA implementation.

 The problem with benchmarks optimized for D is that they 
 generally make little to no allocations, which makes them a bad 
 candidate for memory allocation statistics.

If you take a look at the code you'll see that they often 
allocate like crazy.

"Abdulhaq" <alynch4047 gmail.com> writes:

On Sunday, 28 June 2015 at 01:41:53 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
 Does anyone know of any GC intensive D programs that can 
 preferably be ran with little to no setup?

I remember Maxime said that the Higgs compiler was gc intensive

https://github.com/higgsjs/Higgs