www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - Live code analysis in DCT

reply "Roman D. Boiko" <rb d-coding.com> writes:
http://d-coding.com/2012/05/24/performing-live-analysis-in-dct.html
May 24 2012
next sibling parent reply dennis luehring <dl.soluz gmx.net> writes:
Am 24.05.2012 14:25, schrieb Roman D. Boiko:

 http://d-coding.com/2012/05/24/performing-live-analysis-in-dct.html


for ideas look at the (dead) decent ide - nice examples of great features

http://www.youtube.com/user/asterite

compile-time view

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAhrFQVnsrY&list=UUPrzytX4vxdaQU4IXnFEzUg&index=2&feature=plcp
May 24 2012
parent reply Ary Manzana <ary esperanto.org.ar> writes:
On 5/24/12 20:02 , dennis luehring wrote:

 Am 24.05.2012 14:25, schrieb Roman D. Boiko:

 http://d-coding.com/2012/05/24/performing-live-analysis-in-dct.html


 for ideas look at the (dead) decent ide - nice examples of great features

 http://www.youtube.com/user/asterite


Maybe this playlist is more appropriate :-P

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1DFFABD495A9072E&feature=plcp


 compile-time view

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAhrFQVnsrY&list=UUPrzytX4vxdaQU4IXnFEzUg&index=2&feature=plcp
May 24 2012
next sibling parent "Roman D. Boiko" <rb d-coding.com> writes:
On Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 14:23:27 UTC, Ary Manzana wrote:

 On 5/24/12 20:02 , dennis luehring wrote:

 Am 24.05.2012 14:25, schrieb Roman D. Boiko:

 http://d-coding.com/2012/05/24/performing-live-analysis-in-dct.html


 for ideas look at the (dead) decent ide - nice examples of 
 great features

 http://www.youtube.com/user/asterite


 Maybe this playlist is more appropriate :-P

 http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1DFFABD495A9072E&feature=plcp


 compile-time view

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAhrFQVnsrY&list=UUPrzytX4vxdaQU4IXnFEzUg&index=2&feature=plcp




Thanks, looks very nice
May 24 2012
prev sibling parent Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> writes:
On 2012-05-24 16:23, Ary Manzana wrote:

 On 5/24/12 20:02 , dennis luehring wrote:

 Am 24.05.2012 14:25, schrieb Roman D. Boiko:

 http://d-coding.com/2012/05/24/performing-live-analysis-in-dct.html


 for ideas look at the (dead) decent ide - nice examples of great features

 http://www.youtube.com/user/asterite


 Maybe this playlist is more appropriate :-P

 http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1DFFABD495A9072E&feature=plcp


This is what you're up against Roman, we expect nothing less than this :)

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg
May 25 2012
prev sibling next sibling parent reply Joseph Rushton Wakeling <joseph.wakeling webdrake.net> writes:
On 24/05/12 14:25, Roman D. Boiko wrote:

 http://d-coding.com/2012/05/24/performing-live-analysis-in-dct.html


Regarding another one of your posts (since I don't see a way to comment on your 
blog), you wrote


 Please note, that DCT license is Boost and I would like to keep this license
 for all code in this project. SDC uses MIT license. This means that code from
 SDC should not be used in DCT (unless the author of code releases it under the
 Boost license).


[from here: http://d-coding.com/2012/05/24/contributing-to-dct.html ]

Is there any real reason for such a decision, beyond aesthetics?  The whole 
point of permissive licences such as MIT and Boost is that you can incorporate 
that code into other projects without prejudicing the broader licence choice of 
the codebase.  Doesn't seem worth enforcing such a licensing constraint if the 
MIT-licensed code is useful.
May 24 2012
parent "Roman D. Boiko" <rb d-coding.com> writes:
On Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 13:21:58 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling 
wrote:

 [from here: 
 http://d-coding.com/2012/05/24/contributing-to-dct.html ]

 Is there any real reason for such a decision, beyond 
 aesthetics?  The whole point of permissive licences such as MIT 
 and Boost is that you can incorporate that code into other 
 projects without prejudicing the broader licence choice of the 
 codebase.  Doesn't seem worth enforcing such a licensing 
 constraint if the MIT-licensed code is useful.


I intend to keep front end under a single license. If somebody 
later decide to use code generation from SDC, they will be able 
to do that, but that will be another project. As for the rest, I 
doubt there would be much to reuse anyway because of different 
design approaches. Thus I don't think that benefit is worth 
introducing code under a different license.

(I also asked whether it is possible to switch SDC license to 
Boost some time ago, but didn't get any response.)
May 24 2012
prev sibling parent reply "Bernard Helyer" <b.helyer gmail.com> writes:
On Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 12:25:07 UTC, Roman D. Boiko wrote:

 http://d-coding.com/2012/05/24/performing-live-analysis-in-dct.html


Just sent you an email saying I'm willing to change SDC's license 
to Boost.
May 24 2012
parent "Roman D. Boiko" <rb d-coding.com> writes:
On Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 16:29:04 UTC, Bernard Helyer wrote:

 On Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 12:25:07 UTC, Roman D. Boiko wrote:

 http://d-coding.com/2012/05/24/performing-live-analysis-in-dct.html


 Just sent you an email saying I'm willing to change SDC's 
 license to Boost.


Great, thanks!
May 24 2012