digitalmars.D - LDC 0.9.2 release candidate 3
- Christian Kamm (9/9) Mar 09 2010 Here's a new release candidate featuring a few fixes by klickverbot, faw...
- bearophile (6/12) Mar 09 2010 Can't you add something to this site?
- Don (4/16) Mar 09 2010 Cool!
- Robert Clipsham (6/22) Mar 09 2010 I tried to get some dstress runs done when the first release canidate
- Nick Sabalausky (3/4) Mar 09 2010 Does anyone else besides me find that hilarious?
- Robert Clipsham (4/9) Mar 10 2010 I don't see the funny side, am I missing the joke? I might add that the
- Nick Sabalausky (4/14) Mar 10 2010 The idea of a tool designed to help improve reliability that, itself, ke...
- Robert Clipsham (2/4) Mar 10 2010 Gotcha, haha... Time for a test suite for the test suite then :D
- sybrandy (3/3) Mar 09 2010 Will LDC support D 2.0 and Phobos in the future? If so, do you have an
- Robert Clipsham (7/10) Mar 09 2010 At some point, probably... it doesn't look like it's going to happen any...
Here's a new release candidate featuring a few fixes by klickverbot, fawzi, wilsonk and Deewiant as well as DMDFE 1.057. It's still using LLVM 2.6 and Tango 0.99.9 and is available for Linux x86-64 at: http://www.incasoftware.de/~kamm/ldc/ldc-0.9.2-x86_64-rc3.tbz2 The plan is to release the new version of LDC next week. If someone feels like building and bundling it for 32 bit systems, I'd gladly host it and include it in the announcement. Regards, Christian
Mar 09 2010
Christian Kamm:Here's a new release candidate featuring a few fixes by klickverbot, fawzi, wilsonk and Deewiant as well as DMDFE 1.057. It's still using LLVM 2.6 and Tango 0.99.9 and is available for Linux x86-64 at:I suggest to post such things in the announce newsgroup.If someone feels like building and bundling it for 32 bit systems, I'd gladly host it and include it in the announcement.Can't you add something to this site? https://launchpad.net/~d-language-packagers/+archive/ppa Bye, bearophile
Mar 09 2010
Christian Kamm wrote:Here's a new release candidate featuring a few fixes by klickverbot, fawzi, wilsonk and Deewiant as well as DMDFE 1.057. It's still using LLVM 2.6 and Tango 0.99.9 and is available for Linux x86-64 at: http://www.incasoftware.de/~kamm/ldc/ldc-0.9.2-x86_64-rc3.tbz2 The plan is to release the new version of LDC next week. If someone feels like building and bundling it for 32 bit systems, I'd gladly host it and include it in the announcement. Regards, ChristianCool! Is there any chance of an update to the dstress page? It'd be great to see how both LDC and DMD are doing, even if only a few times per year.
Mar 09 2010
On 09/03/10 20:59, Don wrote:Christian Kamm wrote:I tried to get some dstress runs done when the first release canidate came out, the test runner keeps crashing on me for some reason though (that's also the reason why automated dstress runs on LDC commits stopped). I'll try with a clean install of everything soon and see how things go. Unless someone beats me to it of course :)Here's a new release candidate featuring a few fixes by klickverbot, fawzi, wilsonk and Deewiant as well as DMDFE 1.057. It's still using LLVM 2.6 and Tango 0.99.9 and is available for Linux x86-64 at: http://www.incasoftware.de/~kamm/ldc/ldc-0.9.2-x86_64-rc3.tbz2 The plan is to release the new version of LDC next week. If someone feels like building and bundling it for 32 bit systems, I'd gladly host it and include it in the announcement. Regards, ChristianCool! Is there any chance of an update to the dstress page? It'd be great to see how both LDC and DMD are doing, even if only a few times per year.
Mar 09 2010
"Robert Clipsham" <robert octarineparrot.com> wrote in message news:hn6lau$sib$1 digitalmars.com......the test runner keeps crashing...Does anyone else besides me find that hilarious?
Mar 09 2010
On 09/03/10 23:41, Nick Sabalausky wrote:"Robert Clipsham"<robert octarineparrot.com> wrote in message news:hn6lau$sib$1 digitalmars.com...I don't see the funny side, am I missing the joke? I might add that the test runner is written in C and it's barely been modified since it was first written 5 years ago... Volunteers to port it to D?...the test runner keeps crashing...Does anyone else besides me find that hilarious?
Mar 10 2010
"Robert Clipsham" <robert octarineparrot.com> wrote in message news:hn8joc$1isq$1 digitalmars.com...On 09/03/10 23:41, Nick Sabalausky wrote:The idea of a tool designed to help improve reliability that, itself, keeps crashing, just seems amusingly ironic."Robert Clipsham"<robert octarineparrot.com> wrote in message news:hn6lau$sib$1 digitalmars.com...I don't see the funny side, am I missing the joke? I might add that the test runner is written in C and it's barely been modified since it was first written 5 years ago... Volunteers to port it to D?...the test runner keeps crashing...Does anyone else besides me find that hilarious?
Mar 10 2010
On 10/03/10 18:03, Nick Sabalausky wrote:The idea of a tool designed to help improve reliability that, itself, keeps crashing, just seems amusingly ironic.Gotcha, haha... Time for a test suite for the test suite then :D
Mar 10 2010
Will LDC support D 2.0 and Phobos in the future? If so, do you have an estimate on when? Casey
Mar 09 2010
On 09/03/10 23:16, sybrandy wrote:Will LDC support D 2.0 and Phobos in the future? If so, do you have an estimate on when? CaseyAt some point, probably... it doesn't look like it's going to happen any time soon though. I was working on it, and managed to get druntime compiling (and almost completely running), I just don't have time to work on it any more though. It seems the other LDC developers have also been busy in this respect, so unless someone picks up from where I left off it could be a while.
Mar 09 2010