• bearophile (7/7) Mar 17 2012 I need to attract a bit of your attention to this:
• F i L (2/9) Mar 17 2012 Is UFCS planned for 2.059?
• H. S. Teoh (7/8) Mar 17 2012 [...]
• F i L (2/3) Mar 18 2012 Great!
• Dmitry Olshansky (6/11) Mar 18 2012 I fail to see how property should affect this code in any way, no '='
• David Nadlinger (3/9) Mar 18 2012 Calling parameterless functions without parens?
• Dmitry Olshansky (4/13) Mar 18 2012 Ah, right. It was right there in the plain sight :)

"bearophile" <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

I need to attract a bit of your attention to this:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7670

Currently this (very nice) code gets accepted even with the 
-property compiler switch:

[1, 2, -3, 4].filter!(x => x > 0).map!(x => x ^^ 0.2).writeln;

Bye,
bearophile

"F i L" <witte2008 gmail.com> writes:

On Sunday, 18 March 2012 at 02:50:40 UTC, bearophile wrote:
 I need to attract a bit of your attention to this:

 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7670

 Currently this (very nice) code gets accepted even with the 
 -property compiler switch:

 [1, 2, -3, 4].filter!(x => x > 0).map!(x => x ^^ 0.2).writeln;

 Bye,
 bearophile

Is UFCS planned for 2.059?

"H. S. Teoh" <hsteoh quickfur.ath.cx> writes:

On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 05:33:21AM +0100, F i L wrote:
[...]
 Is UFCS planned for 2.059?

[...]

It's already checked into git. So it will be in 2.059 for sure.


T

-- 
Let's call it an accidental feature. -- Larry Wall

"F i L" <witte2008 gmail.com> writes:

H. S. Teoh wrote:
 It's already checked into git. So it will be in 2.059 for sure.

Great!

Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh gmail.com> writes:

On 18.03.2012 6:50, bearophile wrote:
 I need to attract a bit of your attention to this:

 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7670

 Currently this (very nice) code gets accepted even with the -property
 compiler switch:

 [1, 2, -3, 4].filter!(x => x > 0).map!(x => x ^^ 0.2).writeln;

I fail to see how property should affect this code in any way, no '=' 
anywhere in sight.
UFCS is indeed nice.


-- 
Dmitry Olshansky

"David Nadlinger" <see klickverbot.at> writes:

On Sunday, 18 March 2012 at 10:32:59 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
 On 18.03.2012 6:50, bearophile wrote:
 […]
 [1, 2, -3, 4].filter!(x => x > 0).map!(x => x ^^ 0.2).writeln;

 I fail to see how property should affect this code in any way, 
 no '=' anywhere in sight.
 UFCS is indeed nice.

Calling parameterless functions without parens?

David

Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh gmail.com> writes:

On 18.03.2012 15:36, David Nadlinger wrote:
 On Sunday, 18 March 2012 at 10:32:59 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
 On 18.03.2012 6:50, bearophile wrote:
 […]
 [1, 2, -3, 4].filter!(x => x > 0).map!(x => x ^^ 0.2).writeln;

 I fail to see how property should affect this code in any way, no '='
 anywhere in sight.
 UFCS is indeed nice.

 Calling parameterless functions without parens?

 David

Ah, right. It was right there in the plain sight  :)

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky