• Dmitry Olshansky (8/8) Mar 21 2012 See this is Jun 2012 post on perl group speaking of unicode support on
• =?utf-8?Q?Simen_Kj=C3=A6r=C3=A5s?= (3/9) Mar 21 2012 June 2012, eh? When you're done with it, can I borrow your time machine?
• Dmitry Olshansky (5/16) Mar 21 2012 Ah, it's a nice typo.

Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh gmail.com> writes:

See this is Jun 2012 post on perl group speaking of unicode support on 
development branch:
http://code.activestate.com/lists/perl5-porters/173477/

Now, keep in mind, that std.regex had O(1) trie lookup for these things 
from day one, because inversion lists with O(lnN) lookup  alone were too 
slow.

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky

=?utf-8?Q?Simen_Kj=C3=A6r=C3=A5s?= <simen.kjaras gmail.com> writes:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:12:31 +0100, Dmitry Olshansky  
<dmitry.olsh gmail.com> wrote:

 See this is Jun 2012 post on perl group speaking of unicode support on  
 development branch:
 http://code.activestate.com/lists/perl5-porters/173477/

 Now, keep in mind, that std.regex had O(1) trie lookup for these things  
 from day one, because inversion lists with O(lnN) lookup  alone were too  
 slow.

June 2012, eh? When you're done with it, can I borrow your time machine?

Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh gmail.com> writes:

On 21.03.2012 19:54, Simen Kjærås wrote:
 On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:12:31 +0100, Dmitry Olshansky
 <dmitry.olsh gmail.com> wrote:

 See this is Jun 2012 post on perl group speaking of unicode support on
 development branch:
 http://code.activestate.com/lists/perl5-porters/173477/

 Now, keep in mind, that std.regex had O(1) trie lookup for these
 things from day one, because inversion lists with O(lnN) lookup alone
 were too slow.

 June 2012, eh? When you're done with it, can I borrow your time machine?

Ah, it's a nice typo.
It nevertheless underlines how far behind the perl folks are ;)

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky