digitalmars.D - ICE: template.c:806: failed assertion `i < parameters->dim'
- Jacob Carlborg (42/42) Oct 28 2009 I have quite a big project and when I compile it I get this internal
- Don (5/10) Oct 28 2009 Bugzilla 2229. Was fixed in DMD1.049.
- Jacob Carlborg (2/12) Oct 28 2009 Thanks, I'll try the latest DMD.
- Jacob Carlborg (9/19) Oct 28 2009 I haven't been using any later version because of various known
- Don (3/27) Oct 28 2009 The compiler now catches a few bugs that used to slip past before. Just
- Andrei Alexandrescu (3/14) Oct 28 2009 Very nicely put!
I have quite a big project and when I compile it I get this internal compiler error: template.c:806: failed assertion `i < parameters->dim'. I don't know what could cause that error so I don't know where to look in my code to try to produce a small test case and report an issue. I'm using quite a lot of templates, template mixins and string mixins. I'm using dmd v1.045, I also get the same error with the latest ldc with this backtrace: Assertion failed: (i < parameters->dim), function deduceFunctionTemplateMatch, file /Users/doob/development/d/ldc/ldc/dmd/template.c, line 816. 0 ldc 0x00bea798 llvm::sys::RWMutexImpl::writer_release() + 312 1 ldc 0x00beb231 llvm::sys::RemoveFileOnSignal(llvm::sys::Path const&, std::string*) + 1393 2 libSystem.B.dylib 0x955072bb _sigtramp + 43 3 libSystem.B.dylib 0xffffffff _sigtramp + 1789889903 4 libSystem.B.dylib 0x9557b23a raise + 26 5 libSystem.B.dylib 0x95587679 abort + 73 6 libSystem.B.dylib 0x9557c3db __assert_rtn + 101 7 ldc 0x000a0911 TemplateDeclaration::deduceFunctionTemplateMatch(Loc, Objects*, Expression*, Expressions*, Objects*) + 2129 8 ldc 0x000a11fa TemplateDeclaration::deduceFunctionTemplate(Scope*, Loc, Objects*, Expression*, Expressions*, int) + 250 9 ldc 0x00041981 CallExp::semantic(Scope*) + 1009 10 ldc 0x000942f2 ReturnStatement::semantic(Scope*) + 386 11 ldc 0x0009146f CompoundStatement::semantic(Scope*) + 191 12 ldc 0x00048c83 FuncDeclaration::semantic3(Scope*) + 1875 13 ldc 0x0009a8b6 TemplateInstance::semantic3(Scope*) + 182 14 ldc 0x000a26c0 TemplateInstance::semantic(Scope*) + 1440 15 ldc 0x00042844 CallExp::semantic(Scope*) + 4788 16 ldc 0x000942f2 ReturnStatement::semantic(Scope*) + 386 17 ldc 0x0009146f CompoundStatement::semantic(Scope*) + 191 18 ldc 0x00048c83 FuncDeclaration::semantic3(Scope*) + 1875 19 ldc 0x00007b81 AttribDeclaration::semantic3(Scope*) + 113 20 ldc 0x000979e6 AggregateDeclaration::semantic3(Scope*) + 150 21 ldc 0x00064886 Module::semantic3(Scope*) + 166 22 ldc 0x0010185f main + 4223 23 ldc 0x00004036 start + 54 24 ldc 0x00000011 start + 18446744073709535249
Oct 28 2009
Jacob Carlborg wrote:I have quite a big project and when I compile it I get this internal compiler error: template.c:806: failed assertion `i < parameters->dim'. I don't know what could cause that error so I don't know where to look in my code to try to produce a small test case and report an issue. I'm using quite a lot of templates, template mixins and string mixins.Bugzilla 2229. Was fixed in DMD1.049. There have been about 60 ICE bugs fixed since 1.045. I want to find out what the regressions are that are stopping people from using the latest DMD -- it's time for the ICE age to end.
Oct 28 2009
Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> On 10/28/09 16:32, Don wrote:Jacob Carlborg wrote:Thanks, I'll try the latest DMD.I have quite a big project and when I compile it I get this internal compiler error: template.c:806: failed assertion `i < parameters->dim'. I don't know what could cause that error so I don't know where to look in my code to try to produce a small test case and report an issue. I'm using quite a lot of templates, template mixins and string mixins.Bugzilla 2229. Was fixed in DMD1.049. There have been about 60 ICE bugs fixed since 1.045. I want to find out what the regressions are that are stopping people from using the latest DMD -- it's time for the ICE age to end.
Oct 28 2009
On 10/28/09 16:32, Don wrote:Jacob Carlborg wrote:I haven't been using any later version because of various known regressions, I think they've been solved know. I tried to compile Tango trunk with DMD trunk and it failed with: /Users/doob/development/d/tango-trunk/build/user/../../user/tango/io/compres /BzipStream.d(270): Error: var has no effect in expression (w) It's returning a value in a void function. I don't know if it's a regression that hasn't been solved or if it's something wrong with Tango.I have quite a big project and when I compile it I get this internal compiler error: template.c:806: failed assertion `i < parameters->dim'. I don't know what could cause that error so I don't know where to look in my code to try to produce a small test case and report an issue. I'm using quite a lot of templates, template mixins and string mixins.Bugzilla 2229. Was fixed in DMD1.049. There have been about 60 ICE bugs fixed since 1.045. I want to find out what the regressions are that are stopping people from using the latest DMD -- it's time for the ICE age to end.
Oct 28 2009
Jacob Carlborg wrote:On 10/28/09 16:32, Don wrote:The compiler now catches a few bugs that used to slip past before. Just change the "return w;" into "return;".Jacob Carlborg wrote:I haven't been using any later version because of various known regressions, I think they've been solved know. I tried to compile Tango trunk with DMD trunk and it failed with: /Users/doob/development/d/tango-trunk/build/user/../../user/tango/io/compres /BzipStream.d(270): Error: var has no effect in expression (w) It's returning a value in a void function. I don't know if it's a regression that hasn't been solved or if it's something wrong with Tango.I have quite a big project and when I compile it I get this internal compiler error: template.c:806: failed assertion `i < parameters->dim'. I don't know what could cause that error so I don't know where to look in my code to try to produce a small test case and report an issue. I'm using quite a lot of templates, template mixins and string mixins.Bugzilla 2229. Was fixed in DMD1.049. There have been about 60 ICE bugs fixed since 1.045. I want to find out what the regressions are that are stopping people from using the latest DMD -- it's time for the ICE age to end.
Oct 28 2009
Don wrote:Jacob Carlborg wrote:I thought that was a feature?On 10/28/09 16:32, Don wrote:The compiler now catches a few bugs that used to slip past before. Just change the "return w;" into "return;".Jacob Carlborg wrote:I haven't been using any later version because of various known regressions, I think they've been solved know. I tried to compile Tango trunk with DMD trunk and it failed with: /Users/doob/development/d/tango-trunk/build/user/../../user/tango/io/compres /BzipStream.d(270): Error: var has no effect in expression (w) It's returning a value in a void function. I don't know if it's a regression that hasn't been solved or if it's something wrong with Tango.I have quite a big project and when I compile it I get this internal compiler error: template.c:806: failed assertion `i < parameters->dim'. I don't know what could cause that error so I don't know where to look in my code to try to produce a small test case and report an issue. I'm using quite a lot of templates, template mixins and string mixins.Bugzilla 2229. Was fixed in DMD1.049. There have been about 60 ICE bugs fixed since 1.045. I want to find out what the regressions are that are stopping people from using the latest DMD -- it's time for the ICE age to end.
Oct 28 2009
grauzone wrote:Don wrote:It's OK for a void function to return another void function, and it's OK if the expression has side-effects. The situations which have been disallowed are ones where the compiler used to completely ignore the expression, generating no code at all. It's now treated exactly the same as if you wrote: w; return; The bug was that although the compiler has always done that transformation, it wasn't running the semantic pass on it.Jacob Carlborg wrote:I thought that was a feature?On 10/28/09 16:32, Don wrote:The compiler now catches a few bugs that used to slip past before. Just change the "return w;" into "return;".Jacob Carlborg wrote:I haven't been using any later version because of various known regressions, I think they've been solved know. I tried to compile Tango trunk with DMD trunk and it failed with: /Users/doob/development/d/tango-trunk/build/user/../../user/tango/io/compres /BzipStream.d(270): Error: var has no effect in expression (w) It's returning a value in a void function. I don't know if it's a regression that hasn't been solved or if it's something wrong with Tango.I have quite a big project and when I compile it I get this internal compiler error: template.c:806: failed assertion `i < parameters->dim'. I don't know what could cause that error so I don't know where to look in my code to try to produce a small test case and report an issue. I'm using quite a lot of templates, template mixins and string mixins.Bugzilla 2229. Was fixed in DMD1.049. There have been about 60 ICE bugs fixed since 1.045. I want to find out what the regressions are that are stopping people from using the latest DMD -- it's time for the ICE age to end.
Oct 29 2009
Don wrote:Jacob Carlborg wrote:Very nicely put! AndreiI have quite a big project and when I compile it I get this internal compiler error: template.c:806: failed assertion `i < parameters->dim'. I don't know what could cause that error so I don't know where to look in my code to try to produce a small test case and report an issue. I'm using quite a lot of templates, template mixins and string mixins.Bugzilla 2229. Was fixed in DMD1.049. There have been about 60 ICE bugs fixed since 1.045. I want to find out what the regressions are that are stopping people from using the latest DMD -- it's time for the ICE age to end.
Oct 28 2009