• JN (4/4) Aug 29 2018 Found this interesting link on proggit -
• rikki cattermole (5/12) Aug 29 2018 I like their design for contract's, it looks rather fitting for the
• Joakim (5/9) Aug 29 2018 Interesting document, it's a good sign that the D generics syntax
• Neia Neutuladh (5/6) Aug 29 2018 I had a glance at the proposals.

JN <666total wp.pl> writes:

Found this interesting link on proggit - 
https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft.md

D is mentioned in the generics part:

https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft-generics-overview.md

rikki cattermole <rikki cattermole.co.nz> writes:

On 29/08/2018 7:03 PM, JN wrote:
 Found this interesting link on proggit - 
 https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft.md
 
 D is mentioned in the generics part:
 
 https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft-
enerics-overview.md 
 

I like their design for contract's, it looks rather fitting for the 
language.

It's a real scaled back approach to a full blown signature design (which 
I want + WIP DIP).

Joakim <dlang joakim.fea.st> writes:

On Wednesday, 29 August 2018 at 07:03:13 UTC, JN wrote:
 Found this interesting link on proggit - 
 https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft.md

 D is mentioned in the generics part:

 https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft-generics-overview.md

Interesting document, it's a good sign that the D generics syntax 
reads the best to me. Good to see Go recognize that and reuse it, 
though without the exclamation point, which marks D template 
instantiations and they should use too.

Neia Neutuladh <neia ikeran.org> writes:

On Wednesday, 29 August 2018 at 07:03:13 UTC, JN wrote:
 https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft-generics-overview.md

I had a glance at the proposals.

The handler proposal seems not to account for errors during error 
handling. Can you have nested `handler` blocks? What would that 
do? Well, they'll figure it out eventually.