• question (5/5) Nov 13 2007 hi,
• TomD (5/28) Nov 13 2007 I have done bindings fpr pthreads (win32) and portaudio. Does
• question (4/36) Nov 13 2007 TomD Wrote:
• question (2/42) Nov 13 2007
• BCS (4/9) Nov 13 2007 what do you have against tango? If tango was shipped with DMD would you ...
• Bowl of petunias (2/16) Nov 14 2007 Oh no! not again!
• BCS (3/19) Nov 14 2007 For what it's worth, I don't use tango. The OP just stated a strong opin...
• Lars Ivar Igesund (10/20) Nov 14 2007 Jascha haven't been involved in our 2.0 branch so far ... he certainly i...
• Jascha Wetzel (3/4) Nov 14 2007 huh!?

question <manyquestion question.net> writes:

hi,

did anyone already do a wrapper for the FreeImage library??

"
FreeImage is an Open Source library project for developers who would like to
support popular graphics image formats like PNG, BMP, JPEG, TIFF and others as
needed by today's multimedia applications. FreeImage is easy to use, fast,
multithreading safe, compatible with all 32-bit versions of Windows, and
cross-platform (works both with Linux and Mac OS X).
"

TomD <t_demmer nospam.web.de> writes:

Bill Baxter Wrote:

 Jascha Wetzel wrote:
 question wrote:
 hi,

 did anyone already do a wrapper for the FreeImage library??

 "
 FreeImage is an Open Source library project for developers who would 
 like to support popular graphics image formats like PNG, BMP, JPEG, 
 TIFF and others as needed by today's multimedia applications. 
 FreeImage is easy to use, fast, multithreading safe, compatible with 
 all 32-bit versions of Windows, and cross-platform (works both with 
 Linux and Mac OS X).
 "

 
 the wrapper class is very rudimentary, but the header file port is fine.
 

 
 Nice.  Maybe you could stick it in the bindings project?
    www.dsource.org/projects/bindings
 Anyone with a dsource login can check things in there.
 
 --bb

I have done bindings fpr pthreads (win32) and portaudio. Does
it make sense to put them there too?

Ciao
TomD

question <manyquestion question.net> writes:

TomD Wrote:

whow - neat. we are doing a dicom project.
i hope the final const comes about - we do not want to use 1.0.

i have been lurking for gtk ..., but nothing seems to go with images and the
like. Jascha Wetzel seems to be porting tango to 2.0 and so we are willing to
use 2.0. one thing thats badly needed is database stuff like firebird.

 Bill Baxter Wrote:
 
 Jascha Wetzel wrote:
 question wrote:
 hi,

 did anyone already do a wrapper for the FreeImage library??

 "
 FreeImage is an Open Source library project for developers who would 
 like to support popular graphics image formats like PNG, BMP, JPEG, 
 TIFF and others as needed by today's multimedia applications. 
 FreeImage is easy to use, fast, multithreading safe, compatible with 
 all 32-bit versions of Windows, and cross-platform (works both with 
 Linux and Mac OS X).
 "

 
 the wrapper class is very rudimentary, but the header file port is fine.
 

 
 Nice.  Maybe you could stick it in the bindings project?
    www.dsource.org/projects/bindings
 Anyone with a dsource login can check things in there.
 
 --bb

 
 I have done bindings fpr pthreads (win32) and portaudio. Does
 it make sense to put them there too?
 
 Ciao
 TomD
 

question <manyquestion question.net> writes:

i think i should clarify one thing. tango is a necessary evil. much rather use
phobos, but it does not have all the goodies of tango yet. we are searching
anything that can be run with phobos (port of the hashmap etc to phobos from
tango).


question Wrote:

 TomD Wrote:
 
 whow - neat. we are doing a dicom project.
 i hope the final const comes about - we do not want to use 1.0.
 
 i have been lurking for gtk ..., but nothing seems to go with images and the
like. Jascha Wetzel seems to be porting tango to 2.0 and so we are willing to
use 2.0. one thing thats badly needed is database stuff like firebird.
 
 Bill Baxter Wrote:
 
 Jascha Wetzel wrote:
 question wrote:
 hi,

 did anyone already do a wrapper for the FreeImage library??

 "
 FreeImage is an Open Source library project for developers who would 
 like to support popular graphics image formats like PNG, BMP, JPEG, 
 TIFF and others as needed by today's multimedia applications. 
 FreeImage is easy to use, fast, multithreading safe, compatible with 
 all 32-bit versions of Windows, and cross-platform (works both with 
 Linux and Mac OS X).
 "

 
 the wrapper class is very rudimentary, but the header file port is fine.
 

 
 Nice.  Maybe you could stick it in the bindings project?
    www.dsource.org/projects/bindings
 Anyone with a dsource login can check things in there.
 
 --bb

 
 I have done bindings fpr pthreads (win32) and portaudio. Does
 it make sense to put them there too?
 
 Ciao
 TomD
 

 

BCS <ao pathlink.com> writes:

Reply to question,

 i think i should clarify one thing. tango is a necessary evil. much
 rather use phobos, but it does not have all the goodies of tango yet.
 we are searching anything that can be run with phobos (port of the
 hashmap etc to phobos from tango).
 

what do you have against tango? If tango was shipped with DMD would you also 
have an issue with it?

I'm not being defensive, I'm just wondering.

Bowl of petunias <bowl h2g2.foobar.co.uk> writes:

BCS Wrote:

 Reply to question,
 
 i think i should clarify one thing. tango is a necessary evil. much
 rather use phobos, but it does not have all the goodies of tango yet.
 we are searching anything that can be run with phobos (port of the
 hashmap etc to phobos from tango).
 

 
 what do you have against tango? If tango was shipped with DMD would you also 
 have an issue with it?
 
 I'm not being defensive, I'm just wondering.
 
 

Oh no! not again!

BCS <ao pathlink.com> writes:

Reply to Bowl,

 BCS Wrote:
 
 Reply to question,
 
 i think i should clarify one thing. tango is a necessary evil. much
 rather use phobos, but it does not have all the goodies of tango
 yet. we are searching anything that can be run with phobos (port of
 the hashmap etc to phobos from tango).
 

 what do you have against tango? If tango was shipped with DMD would
 you also have an issue with it?
 
 I'm not being defensive, I'm just wondering.
 

 Oh no! not again!
 

For what it's worth, I don't use tango. The OP just stated a strong opinion 
without any stated rational, I was just wondering what the rational was.

Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar igesund.net> writes:

question wrote:

 TomD Wrote:
 
 whow - neat. we are doing a dicom project.
 i hope the final const comes about - we do not want to use 1.0.
 
 i have been lurking for gtk ..., but nothing seems to go with images and
 the like. Jascha Wetzel seems to be porting tango to 2.0 and so we are
 willing to use 2.0. one thing thats badly needed is database stuff like
 firebird.
 

Jascha haven't been involved in our 2.0 branch so far ... he certainly is
helping us in other respects though.

You want a database written in D? Or bindings like those in
http://www.dsource.org/projects/ddbi ?

-- 
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango

Jascha Wetzel <firstname mainia.de> writes:

question wrote:
 Jascha Wetzel seems to be porting tango to 2.0 and so we are willing to use
2.0.

huh!?
s/Jascha Wetzel/The Tango team/