digitalmars.D - Feature: __FUNCTION__ to give name of parent function.
- Iain Buclaw (10/10) Dec 21 2010 This was a question asked in IRC, someone wanting a way to have the pare...
- bearophile (4/9) Dec 21 2010 I have seen this enhancement request many times. Time ago I have also su...
- Andrei Alexandrescu (10/20) Dec 21 2010 Yah, we need such. To help with generic code, I'm hoping for:
- Nick Sabalausky (4/30) Dec 21 2010 Yea, I don't even care what the syntax for it is; it's such a frequent
- Jonathan M Davis (3/15) Dec 21 2010 __FUNCTION__ exists in C++. I added a feature request for it a couple of...
This was a question asked in IRC, someone wanting a way to have the parent function name outputted for logging purposes. Just like there is __LINE__ and __FILE__ for access to the line number and filename, would be handy (and trivial to implement) if there was a __FUNCTION__ variable also for outputting the bare name of the function. Optionally could also add a __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ too for outputting the type signature of the function. ie: writeln(__FUNCTION__); // foo writeln(__PRETTY_FUNCTION__); // int foo(string) Regards
Dec 21 2010
Iain Buclaw:someone wanting a way to have the parent function name outputted for logging purposes. Just like there is __LINE__ and __FILE__ for access to the line number and filename, would be handy (and trivial to implement) if there was a __FUNCTION__ variable also for outputting the bare name of the function.I have seen this enhancement request many times. Time ago I have also suggested a reference to the function itself, to be used in self recursive functions. Bye, bearophile
Dec 21 2010
On 12/21/10 10:20 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:This was a question asked in IRC, someone wanting a way to have the parent function name outputted for logging purposes. Just like there is __LINE__ and __FILE__ for access to the line number and filename, would be handy (and trivial to implement) if there was a __FUNCTION__ variable also for outputting the bare name of the function. Optionally could also add a __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ too for outputting the type signature of the function. ie: writeln(__FUNCTION__); // foo writeln(__PRETTY_FUNCTION__); // int foo(string) RegardsYah, we need such. To help with generic code, I'm hoping for: function.stringof module.stringof class.stringof struct.stringof union.stringof enum.stringof to yield the name of the current entity. Andrei
Dec 21 2010
"Andrei Alexandrescu" <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> wrote in message news:iequlo$rdb$2 digitalmars.com...On 12/21/10 10:20 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:Yea, I don't even care what the syntax for it is; it's such a frequent request, there should at least be some way to invoke it.This was a question asked in IRC, someone wanting a way to have the parent function name outputted for logging purposes. Just like there is __LINE__ and __FILE__ for access to the line number and filename, would be handy (and trivial to implement) if there was a __FUNCTION__ variable also for outputting the bare name of the function. Optionally could also add a __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ too for outputting the type signature of the function. ie: writeln(__FUNCTION__); // foo writeln(__PRETTY_FUNCTION__); // int foo(string) RegardsYah, we need such. To help with generic code, I'm hoping for: function.stringof module.stringof class.stringof struct.stringof union.stringof enum.stringof to yield the name of the current entity.
Dec 21 2010
On Tuesday, December 21, 2010 08:20:06 Iain Buclaw wrote:This was a question asked in IRC, someone wanting a way to have the parent function name outputted for logging purposes. Just like there is __LINE__ and __FILE__ for access to the line number and filename, would be handy (and trivial to implement) if there was a __FUNCTION__ variable also for outputting the bare name of the function. Optionally could also add a __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ too for outputting the type signature of the function. ie: writeln(__FUNCTION__); // foo writeln(__PRETTY_FUNCTION__); // int foo(string) Regards__FUNCTION__ exists in C++. I added a feature request for it a couple of months ago: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5140
Dec 21 2010