• Daniel Kozak (5/5) Jan 02 2014 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha
• Daniel Kozak (4/9) Jan 02 2014 It is interesting, my normal message has been mark as spam, and I
• Adam D. Ruppe (2/3) Jan 02 2014 amen
• =?UTF-8?B?QWxpIMOHZWhyZWxp?= (3/4) Jan 02 2014 The hard to read letters are u, c, and k. :p
• Brad Anderson (3/8) Jan 02 2014 Have you considered another possibility?
• Daniel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Koz=E1k?= (2/11) Jan 02 2014 This one is not so hard to read ;-)
• JN (2/11) Jan 02 2014 Brings back memories of that cat/dog RapidShare captcha *shivers*
• =?UTF-8?B?U8O2bmtlIEx1ZHdpZw==?= (5/10) Jan 03 2014 By the way, the Bayes filter that is used for the vibe.d forum has been
• Vladimir Panteleev (18/23) Jan 03 2014 Hi,
• =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_Koz=C3=A1k?= (5/27) Jan 03 2014 Thanks, maybe I was too tired and do not read carefully the captcha ;-).
• Szymon Gatner (2/36) Jan 03 2014 They are obviously 'o' 'r' and 'k' most likely related to Git.

"Daniel Kozak" <kozzi11 gmail.com> writes:

F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

"Daniel Kozak" <kozzi11 gmail.com> writes:

It is interesting, my normal message has been mark as spam, and I 
was unable to rewrite captcha for 8 times. But this message was 
OK :D
On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

"Adam D. Ruppe" <destructionator gmail.com> writes:

On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 F***ing captcha

amen

=?UTF-8?B?QWxpIMOHZWhyZWxp?= <acehreli yahoo.com> writes:

On 01/02/2014 12:14 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote:

 F***ing captcha

The hard to read letters are u, c, and k. :p

Ali

"Brad Anderson" <eco gnuk.net> writes:

On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

Have you considered another possibility? 
http://i.imgur.com/e6kO4T1.jpg

Daniel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Koz=E1k?= <kozzi11 gmail.com> writes:

Brad Anderson píše v Čt 02. 01. 2014 v 23:14 +0000:
 On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

 
 Have you considered another possibility? 
 http://i.imgur.com/e6kO4T1.jpg

This one is not so hard to read ;-)

"JN" <666total wp.pl> writes:

On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 23:14:12 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
 On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing 
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing 
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing 
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

 Have you considered another possibility? 
 http://i.imgur.com/e6kO4T1.jpg

Brings back memories of that cat/dog RapidShare captcha *shivers*

=?UTF-8?B?U8O2bmtlIEx1ZHdpZw==?= <sludwig outerproduct.org> writes:

Am 02.01.2014 21:14, schrieb Daniel Kozak:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

By the way, the Bayes filter that is used for the vibe.d forum has been 
about 99.93% correct so far (2 false negatives and no false positives 
since 3 months, when the final formula was put in place). I'm getting 
about 30 spam messages per day.

"Vladimir Panteleev" <vladimir thecybershadow.net> writes:

On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

Hi,

The forum software used to have a bug where if you failed the 
first CAPTCHA, it would fail all successive CAPTCHA attempts for 
that post submission. It appears to still be fixed, though.

I've tested CAPTCHA functionality just now, and it seems to be 
working properly. I've tried about 5 times and only once I got a 
challenge with an unclear solution. If you get a challenge and 
you're not confident in your solution, it's better to click the 
arrow-circle button to get a different challenge.

I've checked the logs for the past month, and it seems that, with 
all the other spam-preventive measures in place, Akismet is now 
more effective at generating false positives than at actually 
blocking spam. (It has something against Mono-D in particular, it 
seems.) I'm going to try sending feedback of the false positives 
so far, hopefully that will "teach" it that such posts are not 
spam. If that doesn't work, I'll disable it entirely or look into 
replacing it with something else.

=?utf-8?Q?Daniel_Koz=C3=A1k?= <kozzi11 gmail.com> writes:

Thanks, maybe I was too tired and do not read carefully the captcha ;-).

Dne Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:19:43 +0100 Vladimir Panteleev  
<vladimir thecybershadow.net> napsal(a):

 On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing  
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha  
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing  
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha  
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

 Hi,

 The forum software used to have a bug where if you failed the first  
 CAPTCHA, it would fail all successive CAPTCHA attempts for that post  
 submission. It appears to still be fixed, though.

 I've tested CAPTCHA functionality just now, and it seems to be working  
 properly. I've tried about 5 times and only once I got a challenge with  
 an unclear solution. If you get a challenge and you're not confident in  
 your solution, it's better to click the arrow-circle button to get a  
 different challenge.

 I've checked the logs for the past month, and it seems that, with all  
 the other spam-preventive measures in place, Akismet is now more  
 effective at generating false positives than at actually blocking spam.  
 (It has something against Mono-D in particular, it seems.) I'm going to  
 try sending feedback of the false positives so far, hopefully that will  
 "teach" it that such posts are not spam. If that doesn't work, I'll  
 disable it entirely or look into replacing it with something else.


-- 
Vytvořeno poštovní aplikací Opery: http://www.opera.com/mail/

"Szymon Gatner" <noemail gmail.com> writes:

On Friday, 3 January 2014 at 09:35:54 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
 Thanks, maybe I was too tired and do not read carefully the 
 captcha ;-).

 Dne Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:19:43 +0100 Vladimir Panteleev 
 <vladimir thecybershadow.net> napsal(a):

 On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak 
 wrote:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing 
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing 
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing 
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

 Hi,

 The forum software used to have a bug where if you failed the 
 first CAPTCHA, it would fail all successive CAPTCHA attempts 
 for that post submission. It appears to still be fixed, though.

 I've tested CAPTCHA functionality just now, and it seems to be 
 working properly. I've tried about 5 times and only once I got 
 a challenge with an unclear solution. If you get a challenge 
 and you're not confident in your solution, it's better to 
 click the arrow-circle button to get a different challenge.

 I've checked the logs for the past month, and it seems that, 
 with all the other spam-preventive measures in place, Akismet 
 is now more effective at generating false positives than at 
 actually blocking spam. (It has something against Mono-D in 
 particular, it seems.) I'm going to try sending feedback of 
 the false positives so far, hopefully that will "teach" it 
 that such posts are not spam. If that doesn't work, I'll 
 disable it entirely or look into replacing it with something 
 else.


They are obviously 'o' 'r' and 'k' most likely related to Git.