www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - Exchange of possible interest :o)

reply Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-10/msg00037.html

Andrei
Oct 04 2011
next sibling parent reply Caligo <iteronvexor gmail.com> writes:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <
SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> wrote:


 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/**2011-10/msg00037.html<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-10/msg00037.html>

 Andrei


Does this mean D will be part of GCC 4.7?
Oct 04 2011
parent reply Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:
On 10/4/11 9:50 PM, Caligo wrote:

 On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
 <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org <mailto:SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org>>
 wrote:

     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/__2011-10/msg00037.html
     <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-10/msg00037.html>

     Andrei


 Does this mean D will be part of GCC 4.7?


This is our firm intent. Walter has carried all the legal footwork. We 
now need to do the technical part, as discussed in that thread.

Andrei
Oct 04 2011
parent deadalnix <deadalnix gmail.com> writes:
Le 05/10/2011 05:38, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :

 On 10/4/11 9:50 PM, Caligo wrote:

 On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
 <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org <mailto:SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org>>
 wrote:

 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/__2011-10/msg00037.html
 <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-10/msg00037.html>

 Andrei


 Does this mean D will be part of GCC 4.7?


 This is our firm intent. Walter has carried all the legal footwork. We
 now need to do the technical part, as discussed in that thread.

 Andrei


That would be nice ! And a great step forward for D.
Oct 05 2011
prev sibling next sibling parent Jens Mueller <jens.k.mueller gmx.de> writes:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-10/msg00037.html
 
 Andrei


This would be awesome. I hope it works out. What a great move.

Jens
Oct 05 2011
prev sibling parent reply Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> writes:
So the next step is a manhunt for Dave F. Or a rewrite of the parts he contr=
ibuted?

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 4, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.o=
rg> wrote:


 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-10/msg00037.html
=20
 Andrei
Oct 05 2011
next sibling parent reply Jerry <jlquinn optonline.net> writes:
Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> writes:


 So the next step is a manhunt for Dave F. Or a rewrite of the parts he
 contributed?


How difficult is it to identify and rewrite the parts he contributed?
Oct 05 2011
parent reply maarten van damme <maartenvd1994 gmail.com> writes:
great news, will certainly help d a bit forward but will it be for d1 or d2?
Oct 05 2011
parent Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au gmail.com> writes:
On 5/10/11 9:41 PM, maarten van damme wrote:

 great news, will certainly help d a bit forward but will it be for d1 or
 d2?


GDC is both I believe.
Oct 05 2011
prev sibling parent reply Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw ubuntu.com> writes:
== Quote from Sean Kelly (sean invisibleduck.org)'s article

 So the next step is a manhunt for Dave F. Or a rewrite of the parts he contr
 ibuted?
 Sent from my iPhone
 On Oct 4, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.o
 rg> wrote:

 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-10/msg00037.html

 Andrei




Fun Facts.

Since the import of GDC from sourceforge into bitbucket after David went MIA,
excluding:

- white space changes in lines.
- changes in the amount of white space.
- changes whose lines are all blank.

There have been 39 files changed, 17879 insertions, and 6886 deletions to the
GDC
code. There are a total of 34376 lines of code in the project.

Regards
Iain
Oct 05 2011
parent reply Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw ubuntu.com> writes:
== Quote from Sean Kelly (sean invisibleduck.org)'s article

 So the next step is a manhunt for Dave F. Or a rewrite of the parts he contr
 ibuted?
 Sent from my iPhone


No need for a manhunt. :)

I've already made contact, and he has agreed to assign copyright to the FSF, and
will get started on the process of getting a disclaimer from my employer as
well.

Regards
Iain
Oct 06 2011
parent reply Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> writes:
On 10/6/2011 12:01 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:

 I've already made contact, and he has agreed to assign copyright to the FSF,
and
 will get started on the process of getting a disclaimer from my employer as
well.


Great news!

Please thank David for me.
Oct 06 2011
next sibling parent reply maarten van damme <maartenvd1994 gmail.com> writes:
gdc compile d2 only if you compile it with the -d2 flag. will this included
version compile d1 or d2?
Oct 06 2011
parent Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw ubuntu.com> writes:
== Quote from maarten van damme (maartenvd1994 gmail.com)'s article

 --00504502c305eaf45304aea6c884
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 gdc compile d2 only if you compile it with the -d2 flag. will this included
 version compile d1 or d2?
 --00504502c305eaf45304aea6c884
 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
 gdc compile d2 only if you compile it with the -d2 flag. will this included


version compile d1 or d2?<div><br></div>

 --00504502c305eaf45304aea6c884--


You mean like Daniel's MinGW packages?  That has never been a feature of gdc in
the main tree.  I'll be pushing for D2 to be the version to be included.

Regards
Iain
Oct 06 2011
prev sibling parent Fawzi Mohamed <fawzi gmx.ch> writes:
really a great news, I am looking forward to this.

Fawzi
Oct 06 2011