• Stefan Koch (7/7) Jul 01 2016 Hi,
• ketmar (7/7) Jul 01 2016 there is no need in that, absolutely. CTFE is undebugabble anyway
• Walter Bright (3/4) Jul 01 2016 It's not necessary since CTFE code can all be executed at runtime, and c...
• Stefan Koch (3/7) Jul 01 2016 Fair enough :)
• Basile B. (5/13) Jul 01 2016 What I'd like is that the code inside 'if(__ctfe)' branches gets

Stefan Koch <uplink.coder googlemail.com> writes:

Hi,

Exactly as per title.
Do you want to see coverage for code executed at CTFE ?

I ask because it is slightly tricky to support this and it needs 
to be factored in early in design.

And please off-topic or thread hijacking this time.

Thanks!

ketmar <ketmar ketmar.no-ip.org> writes:

there is no need in that, absolutely. CTFE is undebugabble anyway 
(and pragma(msg) not really helps -- i'm saying that as a fan of 
printf debugger), unittesting it is silly and so on.

after all, as CTFE *should* behave the same if it is done in 
runtime, one can always test and debug CTFE code as "normal" code 
before using.

so, i say: "don't bother".

Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> writes:

On 7/1/2016 1:29 PM, Stefan Koch wrote:
 Do you want to see coverage for code executed at CTFE ?

It's not necessary since CTFE code can all be executed at runtime, and coverage 
tested that way.

Stefan Koch <uplink.coder googlemail.com> writes:

On Saturday, 2 July 2016 at 00:34:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
 On 7/1/2016 1:29 PM, Stefan Koch wrote:
 Do you want to see coverage for code executed at CTFE ?

 It's not necessary since CTFE code can all be executed at 
 runtime, and coverage tested that way.

Fair enough :)

execpt for code guarded by if (__ctfe)

Basile B. <b2.temp gmx.com> writes:

On Saturday, 2 July 2016 at 00:38:56 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
 On Saturday, 2 July 2016 at 00:34:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
 On 7/1/2016 1:29 PM, Stefan Koch wrote:
 Do you want to see coverage for code executed at CTFE ?

 It's not necessary since CTFE code can all be executed at 
 runtime, and coverage tested that way.

 Fair enough :)

 execpt for code guarded by if (__ctfe)

What I'd like is that the code inside 'if(__ctfe)' branches gets 
ignored in the coverage results, so that 100% can be reached. for 
normal CTFE, to use assert() instead of static assert() does the 
trick.