digitalmars.D - D: at Borders soon?
- AJ (13/13) Nov 14 2009 Is D about to go commercial? I mean, in the form of a book or a series o...
- Don (2/10) Nov 14 2009 That's completely false. Nobody is making any money from D.
- AJ (1/12) Nov 16 2009
- Mike Farnsworth (5/19) Nov 16 2009 AJ, I have no intention of offending you or anyone else, but something n...
- AJ (26/49) Nov 20 2009 Oh go ahead and give it a go. Suppressing stuff is bad, catharsis is goo...
- Nick Sabalausky (4/5) Nov 14 2009 Speaking of facetiousness:
- Tim Matthews (14/32) Nov 14 2009 D is not intended as a scam for someones profit but a good language and
- AJ (4/7) Nov 16 2009 Oh? Is it the current direction. Oh, yeah, bill gates is stupid (I think...
- Nick Sabalausky (3/11) Nov 16 2009 Great, sounds like you don't have much to worry about.
- Tim Matthews (3/19) Nov 17 2009 A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a
- Chris Nicholson-Sauls (3/24) Nov 18 2009 I know that I know nothing. -- Socrates, c. 399 BCE
- Justin Johansson (3/11) Nov 18 2009 Billy Shakes, Billy Gates, what's the diff?
- Derek Parnell (6/7) Nov 15 2009 By George! I think he's right.
Is D about to go commercial? I mean, in the form of a book or a series of books? Is the seeming disarray of the language, the ng, the "community", the inventor because the goal is to capitalize on book sales? I'm a prick, of course, but I would like to know. I was being facetious above. (But if the shoe fits, wear it!). Walter, how much money do you have? Nevermind that. Are you rich though? I am poor. Someone said D bought you a Ferrari. How many of those does one person need? If this book sells, are you going to give to each and every poster in this ng a fair portion? (Don't worry your pretty little head Walter about such stuff ;) If I had (just) a compiler, I'd ... die an old man with a compiler. All the above questions are rhetorical. (Read, I'm not really a prick, I just play one on the internet!). My first Big D post!
Nov 14 2009
AJ wrote:Is D about to go commercial? I mean, in the form of a book or a series of books? Is the seeming disarray of the language, the ng, the "community", the inventor because the goal is to capitalize on book sales? I'm a prick, of course, but I would like to know. I was being facetious above. (But if the shoe fits, wear it!). Walter, how much money do you have? Nevermind that. Are you rich though? I am poor. Someone said D bought you a Ferrari.That's completely false. Nobody is making any money from D.
Nov 14 2009
I don't believe you.Don wrote: AJ wrote:Is D about to go commercial? I mean, in the form of a book or a series of books? Is the seeming disarray of the language, the ng, the "community", the inventor because the goal is to capitalize on book sales? I'm a prick, of course, but I would like to know. I was being facetious above. (But if the shoe fits, wear it!). Walter, how much money do you have? Nevermind that. Are you rich though? I am poor. Someone said D bought you a Ferrari.That's completely false. Nobody is making any money from D.
Nov 16 2009
AJ Wrote:I don't believe you.AJ, I have no intention of offending you or anyone else, but something needs to be made clear. A more productive thing for you to do is contribute to some aspect of D or its available libraries and make it succeed such that you can make money off of it yourself via resume enhancement and adding to your portfolio. Demanding a handout is, let's just say, not very effective. I saw a few of your other posts, and I would posit that you are an intelligent person who can make a positive impact by writing some code or otherwise helping out. It doesn't matter in the slightest whether you believe Don or not. Walking on to some NG and essentially calling people liars tends to just reflect poorly on you, but you already knew that. I want to assist where I can whether or not Walter, Andrei, Don, or anyone else is or isn't making money off of D. I am free to use it, so what they do with it is none of my concern. I don't want anyone to "share" any money with me, because I can work and earn my own keep. Making money off of your own hard work and (gasp!) keeping it for some time period is the opposite of a sin. That's called a 'job.' And Walter is doing a great job, as far as I've seen. -MikeDon wrote: AJ wrote:Is D about to go commercial? I mean, in the form of a book or a series of books? Is the seeming disarray of the language, the ng, the "community", the inventor because the goal is to capitalize on book sales? I'm a prick, of course, but I would like to know. I was being facetious above. (But if the shoe fits, wear it!). Walter, how much money do you have? Nevermind that. Are you rich though? I am poor. Someone said D bought you a Ferrari.That's completely false. Nobody is making any money from D.
Nov 16 2009
Mike Farnsworth wrote:AJ, I have no intention of offending youOh go ahead and give it a go. Suppressing stuff is bad, catharsis is good. I'm tough and I don't think there is anyone who can really offend me. Save for those who capitalize on other people's efforts. Or those who manipulate systems to there own advantage. Or imposing people. Or condescending people. Or politicians. Or vultures. Or cat lovers. ;)or anyone else, but something needs to be made clear. A more productive thing for you to do is contribute to some aspect of D or its available libraries and make it succeed such that you can make money off of it yourself via resume enhancement and adding to your portfolio.So you're in recruiting huh (yes, it is apparent).Demanding a handout is, let's just say, not very effective.Surely you're not insinuating that _I_ want something?I saw a few of your other posts, and I would posit that you are an intelligent person who can make a positive impact by writing some code or otherwise helping out.Sounds like a road to the poorhouse and dying on the streets homeless.It doesn't matter in the slightest whether you believe Don or not.What matters is that it may matter to people who are toiling on/with D, where the spoils are going to or will be going to.Walking on to some NG and essentially calling people liars tends to just reflect poorly on you, but you already knew that.I didn't call anyone a liar. (Which is comical in itself, for everyone lies. Except me of course.)I want to assist where I can whether or not Walter, Andrei, Don, or anyone else is or isn't making money off of D.Unpaid labor is nirvana huh.I am free to use it,But you don't own it.so what they do with it is none of my concern. I don't want anyone to "share" any money with me, because I can work and earn my own keep.Similarly, you don't want anyone exploiting you and not paying you for your wares, surely.Making money off of your own hard work and (gasp!) keeping it for some time period is the opposite of a sin. That's called a 'job.' And Walter is doing a great job, as far as I've seen.Time will tell. I think C++ and D are historical things to examine and use parts from. The programming language junkyards or museums, if you will. As an inventor, I wonder if there is anything there that I can use in my next invention. Maybe because my impressions of D come from the newsgroup I think that, but it does eerily seem to be one of those IT Dept. projects gone awry: 10 years and it's still only 10% complete? Why do we keeping throwing effort into it?! ( ;) Just a tad facetious ).
Nov 20 2009
"AJ" <aj nospam.net> wrote in message news:hdo281$1cua$1 digitalmars.com...I was being facetious above.Speaking of facetiousness: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." - Inigo Montoya
Nov 14 2009
AJ wrote:Is D about to go commercial?D is not intended as a scam for someones profit but a good language and if somebody profits as a side effect then so be it.I mean, in the form of a book or a series of books? Is the seeming disarray of the language, the ng, the "community", the inventor because the goal is to capitalize on book sales? I'm a prick, of course, but I would like to know.Andrei (a lot of work on phobos) is working on a book titled "The D programming language". He will make money but the D community will benefit a lot more in non financial ways from the release of this book.I was being facetious above. (But if the shoe fits, wear it!). Walter, how much money do you have? Nevermind that. Are you rich though?Walter has other forms of income which you will need to consider before you estimate his profit from D. Infact I doubt he has made much at all from D other than the lectures.I am poor. Someone said D bought you a Ferrari. How many of those does one person need? If this book sells, are you going to give to each and every poster in this ng a fair portion?GTFO. (Don't worry your pretty little head Walter about suchstuff ;) If I had (just) a compiler, I'd ... die an old man with a compiler.I doubt you've hit puberty.All the above questions are rhetorical. (Read, I'm not really a prick, I just play one on the internet!). My first Big D post!I've seen you post quite a few posts lately here. Please spend some more time looking up the answers before you rush to this NG from now on.
Nov 14 2009
Tim Matthews wrote:AJ wrote:Oh? Is it the current direction. Oh, yeah, bill gates is stupid (I think so). I hate being smart.Is D about to go commercial?D is not intended as a scam for someones profit
Nov 16 2009
"AJ" <aj nospam.net> wrote in message news:hdr79b$1cms$1 digitalmars.com...Tim Matthews wrote:....That came straight out of left-field.AJ wrote:Oh? Is it the current direction. Oh, yeah, bill gates is stupid (I think so).Is D about to go commercial?D is not intended as a scam for someones profitI hate being smart.Great, sounds like you don't have much to worry about.
Nov 16 2009
Nick Sabalausky wrote:"AJ" <aj nospam.net> wrote in message news:hdr79b$1cms$1 digitalmars.com...A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool. -- William Shakespeare.Tim Matthews wrote:....That came straight out of left-field.AJ wrote:Oh? Is it the current direction. Oh, yeah, bill gates is stupid (I think so).Is D about to go commercial?D is not intended as a scam for someones profitI hate being smart.Great, sounds like you don't have much to worry about.
Nov 17 2009
Tim Matthews wrote:Nick Sabalausky wrote:I know that I know nothing. -- Socrates, c. 399 BCE Shakespeare was such a plagiarist."AJ" <aj nospam.net> wrote in message news:hdr79b$1cms$1 digitalmars.com...A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool. -- William Shakespeare.Tim Matthews wrote:....That came straight out of left-field.AJ wrote:Oh? Is it the current direction. Oh, yeah, bill gates is stupid (I think so).Is D about to go commercial?D is not intended as a scam for someones profitI hate being smart.Great, sounds like you don't have much to worry about.
Nov 18 2009
Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:Tim Matthews wrote:Billy Shakes, Billy Gates, what's the diff? nothing .. both plagiaristsA fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool. -- William Shakespeare.I know that I know nothing. -- Socrates, c. 399 BCE Shakespeare was such a plagiarist.
Nov 18 2009
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:06:10 -0600, AJ wrote:I'm a prick, of courseBy George! I think he's right. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia skype: derek.j.parnell
Nov 15 2009