www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - D, ZeroMQ, Nanomsg

reply Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> writes:
Hi,

I see that some people have wrapped in various different ways ZeroMQ.
Was this manually, or using DStep?

Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? If yes, was this manually or using DStep.

--=20
Russel.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder ekiga.n=
et
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
Sep 28 2016
next sibling parent reply JN <666total wp.pl> writes:
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder 
wrote:

 Hi,

 I see that some people have wrapped in various different ways 
 ZeroMQ. Was this manually, or using DStep?

 Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? If yes, was this manually or using 
 DStep.


Not sure how they did it, but there are at least three Nanomsg 
bindings available:

http://code.dlang.org/packages/derelict_extras-nanomsg
http://code.dlang.org/packages/nanomsg
http://code.dlang.org/packages/d-nanomsg
Sep 28 2016
parent eugene <egordeev18 gmail.com> writes:
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:55:15 UTC, JN wrote:

 On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder 
 wrote:

 Hi,

 I see that some people have wrapped in various different ways 
 ZeroMQ. Was this manually, or using DStep?

 Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? If yes, was this manually or using 
 DStep.


 Not sure how they did it, but there are at least three Nanomsg 
 bindings available:

 http://code.dlang.org/packages/derelict_extras-nanomsg
 http://code.dlang.org/packages/nanomsg
 http://code.dlang.org/packages/d-nanomsg


do you know if there are some mq-s written in d?
Sep 28 2016
prev sibling next sibling parent Ilya Yaroshenko <ilyayaroshenko gmail.com> writes:
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder 
wrote:

 Hi,

 I see that some people have wrapped in various different ways 
 ZeroMQ. Was this manually, or using DStep?

 Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? If yes, was this manually or using 
 DStep.


http://code.dlang.org/packages/nanomsg
was converted manually. --Ilya
Sep 28 2016
prev sibling next sibling parent Zoadian <no no.no> writes:
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder 
wrote:

 Hi,

 I see that some people have wrapped in various different ways 
 ZeroMQ. Was this manually, or using DStep?

 Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? If yes, was this manually or using 
 DStep.


derelict_extras-nanomsg was converted manually
Sep 28 2016
prev sibling parent reply Nikolay <sibnick gmail.com> writes:
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder 
wrote:


 Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg?


Be aware - Nanomsg project is mostly dead now. See 
http://sealedabstract.com/rants/nanomsg-postmortem-and-other-stories/
Sep 28 2016
next sibling parent ketmar <ketmar ketmar.no-ip.org> writes:
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 04:18:55 UTC, Nikolay wrote:

 Be aware - Nanomsg project is mostly dead now.


lol. if one drama queen moved out, that doesn't mean that the 
project is dead. it only means: "godspeed, drama queen."
Sep 28 2016
prev sibling next sibling parent Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> writes:
On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 04:18 +0000, Nikolay via Digitalmars-d wrote:

 On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder=C2=A0
 wrote:
=20

=20
 Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg?


=20
 Be aware - Nanomsg project is mostly dead now. See=C2=A0
 http://sealedabstract.com/rants/nanomsg-postmortem-and-other-stories/


Last person I know who chose Nanomsg over ZeroMQ did so after trying
both a few days ago. Nanomsg got chosen because of nicer API and that
the project was lively and progressing. It's all about points of view I
guess.

--=20
Russel.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder ekiga.n=
et
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
Sep 29 2016
prev sibling next sibling parent qznc <qznc web.de> writes:
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 04:18:55 UTC, Nikolay wrote:

 On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder 
 wrote:


 Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg?


 Be aware - Nanomsg project is mostly dead now. See 
 http://sealedabstract.com/rants/nanomsg-postmortem-and-other-stories/


That article was in February. There was a 1.0.0 release in June.
Sep 29 2016
prev sibling parent reply Laeeth Isharc <laeethnospam nospamlaeeth.com> writes:
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 04:18:55 UTC, Nikolay wrote:

 On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder 
 wrote:e


 Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg?


 Be aware - Nanomsg project is mostly dead now. See 
 http://sealedabstract.com/rants/nanomsg-postmortem-and-other-stories/



Nanomsg is not dead.   The maintainer tried to introduce a code 
of conduct (about which even he was uncertain of the merits of), 
felt he didn't have the effective power to do so,  and then 
resigned in frustration.   A few weeks later he was back and it 
hit 1.0 recently.
Had an exchange with Pieter on Reddit and after looking at commit 
history,  he took back his suggestion that Nanomsg was dead.

It's silly to compare the two communities and make any inferences 
because Nanomsg has fewer people and the originator has a job and 
Google and many interests.

There are deimos bindings that Ilya wrote for me and I 
open-sourced,  and a wrapper that I wrote that is also open 
sourced.  There are some bugs in the deimos binding - haven't yet 
had time to push my changes.

The wrapper isn't super well tested but I use it.   Will make it 
more polished when I have more time.


Laeeth
Sep 30 2016
parent Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> writes:
I also chose Ilya's nanomsg over zeromq, there were some fundamental flaws
in ZMQ that it addresses, and it is more flexible.

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:


 On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 04:18:55 UTC, Nikolay wrote:


 On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:e

 Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg?


 Be aware - Nanomsg project is mostly dead now. See
 http://sealedabstract.com/rants/nanomsg-postmortem-and-other-stories/



 Nanomsg is not dead.   The maintainer tried to introduce a code of conduct
 (about which even he was uncertain of the merits of), felt he didn't have
 the effective power to do so,  and then resigned in frustration.   A few
 weeks later he was back and it hit 1.0 recently.
 Had an exchange with Pieter on Reddit and after looking at commit
 history,  he took back his suggestion that Nanomsg was dead.

 It's silly to compare the two communities and make any inferences because
 Nanomsg has fewer people and the originator has a job and Google and many
 interests.

 There are deimos bindings that Ilya wrote for me and I open-sourced,  and
 a wrapper that I wrote that is also open sourced.  There are some bugs in
 the deimos binding - haven't yet had time to push my changes.

 The wrapper isn't super well tested but I use it.   Will make it more
 polished when I have more time.


 Laeeth





 Oct 05 2016