digitalmars.D - D Language Version 3
- Suminda Dharmasena (4/4) May 27 2014 Hi,
- Daniel Murphy (3/7) May 27 2014 No.
- Anton (2/11) May 30 2014 No++;
- Don (15/19) May 28 2014 No, it has not been out for a while. I would even say that it's
- Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d (14/35) May 30 2014 Reposting this without the html problems...
- Dejan Lekic (9/13) May 28 2014 FYI there is no stable version of D2. There are still many grey
-
Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
(41/41)
May 28 2014
deadalnix (3/3) May 28 2014 On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
- Marco Leise (6/11) May 29 2014 So I figure you didn't read the text/html part with the nice
- Vladimir Panteleev (6/6) May 28 2014 On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
- Steven Schveighoffer (9/14) May 29 2014 Hah, I wondered why these snarky replies quoting nothing were showing up...
- H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d (6/26) May 29 2014 [...]
- Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d (7/13) May 29 2014 On Thu, 29 May 2014 06:30:05 +0000
- francesco cattoglio (6/12) May 30 2014 Perhaps it is fixed, but on the web forum still there's nothing
- Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d (7/21) May 30 2014 On Fri, 30 May 2014 07:02:33 +0000
- Chris (3/3) May 29 2014 On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
- JR (2/5) May 29 2014 Compiles to only ELF/DWARF headers!
Hi, D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap is like towards D3? Suminda
May 27 2014
"Suminda Dharmasena" wrote in message news:dgufafcodplrxrqcgsqi forum.dlang.org...Hi, D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap is like towards D3? SumindaNo.
May 27 2014
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 04:24:21 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:"Suminda Dharmasena" wrote in message news:dgufafcodplrxrqcgsqi forum.dlang.org...No++;Hi, D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap is like towards D3? SumindaNo.
May 30 2014
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 03:25:28 UTC, Suminda Dharmasena wrote:Hi, D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap is like towards D3? SumindaNo, it has not been out for a while. I would even say that it's not out yet! It still doesn't exist yet in the same way as D1. D1 was a clearly defined snapshot of the language at a particular moment in time. The feature list is unchanged since D1.014, except for array operations which were finally implemented in D1.034. It reached release 1.076 just with bugfixes, ie there were 61 bugfix releases. D2 is the ongoing language development, and we still don't have a stability branch more recent than the D1 branch. Almost every release has contained a new feature, and I can't see that stopping anytime soon.
May 28 2014
Reposting this without the html problems... On Wed, 28 May 2014 08:41:43 +0000 Don via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 03:25:28 UTC, Suminda Dharmasena wrote:Not to mention, there probably aren't even all that many places that we'd change the language in a non-backwards compatible way even if we could start from scratch (and even in those places, we might not change them in D3, because it would make porting from D2 to D3 much riskier). By no means is D2 perfect, but for the most part, I think that we can either fix the problems with it without resorting to D3, or we'd end up having similar problems in D3 anyway. Regardless, we need to make D2 a success before we even consider considering creating something like D3. And there may never be a D3. That's a question that really shouldn't be up for discussion for years yet. - Jonathan M DavisHi, D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap is like towards D3? SumindaNo, it has not been out for a while. I would even say that it's not out yet! It still doesn't exist yet in the same way as D1. D1 was a clearly defined snapshot of the language at a particular moment in time. The feature list is unchanged since D1.014, except for array operations which were finally implemented in D1.034. It reached release 1.076 just with bugfixes, ie there were 61 bugfix releases. D2 is the ongoing language development, and we still don't have a stability branch more recent than the D1 branch. Almost every release has contained a new feature, and I can't see that stopping anytime soon.
May 30 2014
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 03:25:28 UTC, Suminda Dharmasena wrote:Hi, D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap is like towards D3? SumindaFYI there is no stable version of D2. There are still many grey areas and there are yet to come possible radical changes to come (like final-by-default for an example). However, it may be a good idea to have a list of things that are commonly postponed for D3 ocassionally. You are free to go through NG threads, and compile this list. We have http://wiki.dlang.org - perfect place for that.
May 28 2014
<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div>On Wed, 28 May 2014 08:41:43 +0000<br/> Don via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:<br/> <br/> > On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 03:25:28 UTC, Suminda Dharmasena<br/> > wrote:<br/> > > Hi,<br/> > ><br/> > > D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap is<br/> > > like towards D3?<br/> > ><br/> > > Suminda<br/> ><br/> > not out yet!<br/> ><br/> > D1 was a clearly defined snapshot of the language at a particular<br/> > moment in time.<br/> > The feature list is unchanged since D1.014, except for array<br/> > operations which were finally implemented in D1.034. It reached<br/> > release 1.076 just with bugfixes, ie there were 61 bugfix<br/> > releases.<br/> ><br/> > stability branch more recent than the D1 branch. Almost every<br/> > stopping anytime soon.<br/> <br/> change the language in a non-backwards compatible way even if we could start<br/> from scratch (and even in those places, we might not change them in D3,<br/> because it would make porting from D2 to D3 much riskier). By no means is D2<br/> perfect, but for the most part, I think that we can either fix the problems<br/> D3<br/> anyway.<br/> <br/> Regardless, we need to make D2 a success before we even consider considering<br/> that</div> <div><br/> - Jonathan M Davis</div></div></body></html>
May 28 2014
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: That's interesting :D
May 28 2014
Am Thu, 29 May 2014 00:06:29 +0000 schrieb "deadalnix" <deadalnix gmail.com>:On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: That's interesting :DSo I figure you didn't read the text/html part with the nice 1.5x line height which makes reading easy on the eyes? No? :) -- Marco
May 29 2014
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: Please configure your email client to include a text/plain part. Your messages are unreadable to any users of clients that ignore text/html parts, which includes all users of the forum web interface.
May 28 2014
On Thu, 29 May 2014 02:30:05 -0400, Vladimir Panteleev <vladimir thecybershadow.net> wrote:On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: Please configure your email client to include a text/plain part. Your messages are unreadable to any users of clients that ignore text/html parts, which includes all users of the forum web interface.Hah, I wondered why these snarky replies quoting nothing were showing up. I saw the text from Jonathan, so I was confused :) It would be cool if the web forum software replied with a "that doesn't work for me" email, but of course, we no longer have actual email addresses in the posts with this "via Digitalmars-d" stuff :D I can imagine many people use mail clients that by default use text/html. -Steve
May 29 2014
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:46:25AM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d wrote:On Thu, 29 May 2014 02:30:05 -0400, Vladimir Panteleev <vladimir thecybershadow.net> wrote:[...] My mail client only uses text/plain. T -- Not all rumours are as misleading as this one.On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: Please configure your email client to include a text/plain part. Your messages are unreadable to any users of clients that ignore text/html parts, which includes all users of the forum web interface.Hah, I wondered why these snarky replies quoting nothing were showing up. I saw the text from Jonathan, so I was confused :) It would be cool if the web forum software replied with a "that doesn't work for me" email, but of course, we no longer have actual email addresses in the posts with this "via Digitalmars-d" stuff :D I can imagine many people use mail clients that by default use text/html.
May 29 2014
On Thu, 29 May 2014 06:30:05 +0000 Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: Please configure your email client to include a text/plain part. Your messages are unreadable to any users of clients that ignore text/html parts, which includes all users of the forum web interface.Yeah, sorry about that. The web interface that I'm forced to use for e-mail when I'm at work just got changed, and it screwed with my settings - and clearly in a very nasty way. It should be fixed now though. - Jonathan M Davis
May 29 2014
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 06:14:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:Yeah, sorry about that. The web interface that I'm forced to use for e-mail when I'm at work just got changed, and it screwed with my settings - and clearly in a very nasty way. It should be fixed now though. - Jonathan M DavisPerhaps it is fixed, but on the web forum still there's nothing to be seen. What was it about? Something serious or some joke/semiserious stuff?
May 30 2014
On Fri, 30 May 2014 07:02:33 +0000 francesco cattoglio via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 06:14:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:What was what? The post I posted to this thread that got munged? I could repost it, though there are several posts like that across the newsgroup, because I posted several times before I realized what's going on. - Jonathan M DavisYeah, sorry about that. The web interface that I'm forced to use for e-mail when I'm at work just got changed, and it screwed with my settings - and clearly in a very nasty way. It should be fixed now though. - Jonathan M DavisPerhaps it is fixed, but on the web forum still there's nothing to be seen. What was it about? Something serious or some joke/semiserious stuff?
May 30 2014
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: Is this the first attempt at D Version 3? :-)
May 29 2014
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 08:50:38 UTC, Chris wrote:On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: Is this the first attempt at D Version 3? :-)Compiles to only ELF/DWARF headers!
May 29 2014