• Vincent Richomme (3/3) Oct 06 2008 Hi,
• Sean Kelly (4/8) Oct 06 2008 There's functionally little difference between the two. Both are
• Chad J (8/19) Oct 06 2008 I believe D's GC is (automatically) type aware while Boehm GC isn't.

Vincent Richomme <forumer smartmobili.com> writes:

Hi,

Sorry for this stupid question but what is the difference between the 
boehm gc found in GCC sources and the garbage stategy used in D ?

Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> writes:

Vincent Richomme wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Sorry for this stupid question but what is the difference between the 
 boehm gc found in GCC sources and the garbage stategy used in D ?

There's functionally little difference between the two.  Both are 
conservative mark-sweep GCs.


Sean

Chad J <gamerchad __spam.is.bad__gmail.com> writes:

Sean Kelly wrote:
 Vincent Richomme wrote:
 Hi,

 Sorry for this stupid question but what is the difference between the 
 boehm gc found in GCC sources and the garbage stategy used in D ?

 
 There's functionally little difference between the two.  Both are 
 conservative mark-sweep GCs.
 
 
 Sean

I believe D's GC is (automatically) type aware while Boehm GC isn't. 
This means D's GC does not spend time scanning atomic data (data with no 
pointers) such as strings, audio samples, pixmaps, etc, while Boehm GC 
would.  In theory this optimization allows it to run faster and prevent 
some memory leaks.  I think that Boehm GC allows you to manually tell it 
when things are atomic though, so if you are meticulous about it you 
could have the same optimization with Boehm GC.