digitalmars.D - DConf Recommendation
- Chris Williams (14/14) May 28 2014 My first day at DConf, during lunch, I ended up sitting next to
- Walter Bright (2/7) May 28 2014 We'd love to do multiple tracks, but the conference would need to get la...
- Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d (9/17) May 28 2014 Personally I think there were too many talks *per day*, it was hard not
- Chris Williams (10/16) May 28 2014 I suspect that for a power D user, keeping awake through a "How
- Steven Schveighoffer (8/14) May 28 2014 In fact, dconf '13 had a "tutorial" session the day before the main
- deadalnix (6/12) May 28 2014 Yup, at the end of the 3 days, I was like "What happened to my
- Walter Bright (4/6) May 28 2014 The reason Dconf was 3 days was to make it worthwhile for people traveli...
- Dicebot (7/18) May 28 2014 I was like "wtf has happened to my brain _and_ voice" ;)
- ed (12/27) May 28 2014 Does it have to split the entire DConf? What if a half-day was
- Walter Bright (4/6) May 28 2014 We did that for Dconf 2013; having a "tutorial day" preceding the confer...
My first day at DConf, during lunch, I ended up sitting next to the CTO/CEO of a startup company that was considering D as their language of choice. He commented to me, and which makes sense to me, that the format of the conference wasn't very well geared to people who are just interested in figuring out what the language is like and how to get started with it. His recommendation was to offer two tracks over two days (instead of one over three), whith one track focussing on things like how to get a development environment set up on different platforms, how to debug, overview of language features, etc. That way a CTO or other interested party could use the conference as a way to evaluate the language for use at their companies. I also got the sense that he was hiring, should anyone be interested. Apakau.com
May 28 2014
On 5/28/2014 2:05 PM, Chris Williams wrote:His recommendation was to offer two tracks over two days (instead of one over three), whith one track focussing on things like how to get a development environment set up on different platforms, how to debug, overview of language features, etc. That way a CTO or other interested party could use the conference as a way to evaluate the language for use at their companies.We'd love to do multiple tracks, but the conference would need to get larger first.
May 28 2014
Personally I think there were too many talks *per day*, it was hard not getting tired and all the talks were extremely interesting. But I understand that it's hard for people to take more free days for dconf alone. On Wednesday, May 28, 2014, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:On 5/28/2014 2:05 PM, Chris Williams wrote:overHis recommendation was to offer two tracks over two days (instead of onelanguagethree), whith one track focussing on things like how to get a development environment set up on different platforms, how to debug, overview ofconferencefeatures, etc. That way a CTO or other interested party could use thelarger first.as a way to evaluate the language for use at their companies.We'd love to do multiple tracks, but the conference would need to get
May 28 2014
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:04:47 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d wrote:Personally I think there were too many talks *per day*, it was hard not getting tired and all the talks were extremely interesting. But I understand that it's hard for people to take more free days for dconf alone.I suspect that for a power D user, keeping awake through a "How to set up Visual D" step-through would be pretty impossible. If only one person like the guy I mentioned is going to show up, then to Walter's point, there's not much value in providing such a session in the conference. But maybe next year advertize an "intro to D" class that will be on the first day if there's enough interest, and then make people choose between "interested" or "not interested" when they register.
May 28 2014
On Wed, 28 May 2014 18:21:01 -0400, Chris Williams <yoreanon-chrisw yahoo.co.jp> wrote:If only one person like the guy I mentioned is going to show up, then to Walter's point, there's not much value in providing such a session in the conference. But maybe next year advertize an "intro to D" class that will be on the first day if there's enough interest, and then make people choose between "interested" or "not interested" when they register.In fact, dconf '13 had a "tutorial" session the day before the main conference. It was cancelled due to lack of participants. Honestly, that kind of thing would be great as a webinar. Have it some random day before the conference, allowing people to ask questions live, then record it so others can watch it later. -Steve
May 28 2014
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:04:47 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d wrote:Personally I think there were too many talks *per day*, it was hard not getting tired and all the talks were extremely interesting. But I understand that it's hard for people to take more free days for dconf alone.Yup, at the end of the 3 days, I was like "What happened to my brain !" I guess this is a good sign. I mean, some people are traveling from far away, and it cost a lot.
May 28 2014
On 5/28/2014 4:16 PM, deadalnix wrote:I guess this is a good sign. I mean, some people are traveling from far away, and it cost a lot.The reason Dconf was 3 days was to make it worthwhile for people traveling some distance to get there. 2 days is fine for a domestic conference, but 3 days is needed for an international one. 1 day is best for a purely local one.
May 28 2014
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 23:16:58 UTC, deadalnix wrote:On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:04:47 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d wrote:I was like "wtf has happened to my brain _and_ voice" ;) Kind of like the idea of more public / advertising oriented conference but we don't have that many "casual" visitors IMHO. And all those bleeding edge hackers that I have seen during those 3 days will definitely become bored if we try to add more "howto" stuff to main program.Personally I think there were too many talks *per day*, it was hard not getting tired and all the talks were extremely interesting. But I understand that it's hard for people to take more free days for dconf alone.Yup, at the end of the 3 days, I was like "What happened to my brain !"
May 28 2014
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 21:05:13 UTC, Chris Williams wrote:My first day at DConf, during lunch, I ended up sitting next to the CTO/CEO of a startup company that was considering D as their language of choice. He commented to me, and which makes sense to me, that the format of the conference wasn't very well geared to people who are just interested in figuring out what the language is like and how to get started with it. His recommendation was to offer two tracks over two days (instead of one over three), whith one track focussing on things like how to get a development environment set up on different platforms, how to debug, overview of language features, etc. That way a CTO or other interested party could use the conference as a way to evaluate the language for use at their companies. I also got the sense that he was hiring, should anyone be interested. Apakau.comDoes it have to split the entire DConf? What if a half-day was set aside for two streams: a) a workshop for new D users with entry-level talks and maybe even hands-on sessions (would require attendees bring a laptop) b) A set of very technical low-level language talks for hardcore D language developers. If there are not enough for a) people are less likely to mind because it is only a half-day with the alternative listening to interesting D talks anyway. Cheers, ed
May 28 2014
On 5/28/2014 5:20 PM, ed wrote:a) a workshop for new D users with entry-level talks and maybe even hands-on sessions (would require attendees bring a laptop)We did that for Dconf 2013; having a "tutorial day" preceding the conference. There wasn't enough interest in it, so we cancelled it. If there is enough interest next year, we can certainly hold it.
May 28 2014