• Mike Parker (8/8) Mar 20 2015 I know in was decided long ago that {i/c}float/double/real be
• Daniel Murphy (4/11) Mar 21 2015 They go with complex numbers.
• Mike Parker (2/15) Mar 21 2015 Thanks.

"Mike Parker" <aldacron gmail.com> writes:

I know in was decided long ago that {i/c}float/double/real be 
deprecated at some point, but it hasn't happened yet and they are 
still listed in the table at [1]. So I have two questions:

1) Is this still supposed to happen?
2) What about the .re and .im properties?

My assumption is that none of this should be advertised to new 
users, but given that it's all still in the docs I want to be 
sure.

"Daniel Murphy" <yebbliesnospam gmail.com> writes:

"Mike Parker"  wrote in message news:qebnpybksrpthnewvyha forum.dlang.org...

 I know in was decided long ago that {i/c}float/double/real be deprecated 
 at some point, but it hasn't happened yet and they are still listed in the 
 table at [1]. So I have two questions:

 1) Is this still supposed to happen?

Yes.

 2) What about the .re and .im properties?

They go with complex numbers.

 My assumption is that none of this should be advertised to new users, but 
 given that it's all still in the docs I want to be sure.

Probably. 

Mike Parker <aldacron gmail.com> writes:

On 3/21/2015 4:07 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
 "Mike Parker"  wrote in message
 news:qebnpybksrpthnewvyha forum.dlang.org...

 I know in was decided long ago that {i/c}float/double/real be
 deprecated at some point, but it hasn't happened yet and they are
 still listed in the table at [1]. So I have two questions:

 1) Is this still supposed to happen?

 Yes.

 2) What about the .re and .im properties?

 They go with complex numbers.

 My assumption is that none of this should be advertised to new users,
 but given that it's all still in the docs I want to be sure.

 Probably.

Thanks.