• Andrei Alexandrescu (2/2) Dec 09 2010 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4397058/go-vs-d-programming-language
• spir (8/11) Dec 09 2010 One problem is we can hardly say "beeing 10 years older, D is a more sta...
• Daniel Gibson (2/17) Dec 09 2010 Maybe for D1
• Jonathan =?UTF-8?B?U2NobWlkdC1Eb21pbsOp?= (3/3) Dec 15 2010 Well, you could simply say, Go is good for quick and parallelized stream...

Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4397058/go-vs-d-programming-language

Andrei

spir <denis.spir gmail.com> writes:

On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:48:10 -0800
Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> wrote:

 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4397058/go-vs-d-programming-language
=20
 Andrei

One problem is we can hardly say "beeing 10 years older, D is a more stable=
 language".

Denis
-- -- -- -- -- -- --
vit esse estrany =E2=98=A3

spir.wikidot.com

Daniel Gibson <metalcaedes gmail.com> writes:

spir schrieb:
 On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:48:10 -0800
 Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> wrote:
 
 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4397058/go-vs-d-programming-language

 Andrei

 
 One problem is we can hardly say "beeing 10 years older, D is a more stable
language".
 
 Denis
 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
 vit esse estrany ☣
 
 spir.wikidot.com
 

Maybe for D1

Jonathan =?UTF-8?B?U2NobWlkdC1Eb21pbsOp?= <devel the-user.org> writes:

Well, you could simply say, Go is good for quick and parallelized stream-
manipulation. D is good for everything else, because it supports OOP, Meta-
programming, genericity, overloading etc.