digitalmars.D - Bugs marked with [tdpl]
- Andrei Alexandrescu (12/12) Dec 22 2011 I've recently finished marking all sample code in TDPL that won't
- Jonathan M Davis (8/10) Dec 22 2011 This is particularly important if we want D to be newbie friendly. I don...
- kenji hara (38/50) Jan 01 2012 Progress status at the end of 2011.
- kenji hara (46/58) Jan 01 2012 Progress status at the end of 2011.
I've recently finished marking all sample code in TDPL that won't currently work. See http://goo.gl/9sSXP I've also added a few invisible samples - code that is not present in the text, but is implied to work by statements made in the text. I plan to add more of those. Essentially almost every paragraph in TDPL should be followed by an invisible snippet confirming the claims made. That way, TDPL and D would keep unity. I'll add more such invisible snippets over the winter break. I suggest the dmd developers to focus on the bug reports marked with [tdpl] in title. Thanks, Andrei
Dec 22 2011
"Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg gmx.com> On Thursday, December 22, 2011 13:01:56 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:I'll add more such invisible snippets over the winter break. I suggest the dmd developers to focus on the bug reports marked with [tdpl] in title.This is particularly important if we want D to be newbie friendly. I don't think that it's uncommon for newbies to read TDPL and then be frustrated with how dmd doesn't really work the same way. In some cases, that's a result of improvements to the language (e.g. strong vs weak purity), but it's usually beacuse something isn't implemented properly yet. Questions related to that sort of stuff definitely come up on stackoverflow. - Jonathan M Davis
Dec 22 2011
Progress status at the end of 2011. Issue 3235 - [tdpl] Function literals must be deduced as "function" or "delegate"Issue 5605 - [tdpl] foreach with ranges doesn't support opSlice()Issue 6714 - [tdpl] Type inference for parameters of function and delegate literalsIssue 7133 - [tdpl] There should be no empty statement=A0 =A0 RESOLVED FIXED! Issue 1528 - [tdpl] overloading template and non-template functionsIssue 2972 - [tdpl] Can't overload non-templated function against templateIssue 4573 - [tdpl] Specialized functions conflict with generic function=A0 =A0 They are duplications each other Issue 7131 - [tdpl] Hijacking detected where it doesn't exist=A0 =A0 This is a bit related to above three.=A0 =A0 The problem is that the template function overloadings does not calculate 'overload set'. Issue 3382 - [tdpl] Implement uniform function call syntaxIssue 3836 - [tdpl] obligatory override attributeIssue 4596 - [tdpl] Rebinding *this* in class method compilesIssue 4675 - [tdpl] Eponymous Template should hide internal names=A0 =A0 Patches already posted, but not yet merged. Issue 4101 - [tdpl] DMD doesn't give error when goto skips initializationIssue 4595 - [tdpl] Accessing non-static member of a null reference compiles=A0 =A0 Static analysis features. Issue 4542 - [tdpl] TDPL NVI example results in linker errorIssue 6176 - [tdpl] Cannot use string variables in case expressions=A0 =A0 Still discussed in bugzilla? Issue 7135 - [tdpl] Multiple delegate-related issues (literal syntax, system deduction)=A0 =A0 TDPL code problem? (IMHO) Issue 4423 - [tdpl] enums of struct typesIssue 4523 - [tdpl] .remove method for Associative Arrays returns void in all casesIssue 4576 - [tdpl] 0/1 argument calls to overloaded function is allowed in presence of variadic functionIssue 6083 - [tdpl] There can be only one alias this.Issue 7132 - [tdpl] Exponential operator ^^ for integrals does not compile without any import=A0 =A0 ... Kenji Hara 2011/12/23 Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org>:I've recently finished marking all sample code in TDPL that won't current=lywork. See http://goo.gl/9sSXP I've also added a few invisible samples - code that is not present in the text, but is implied to work by statements made in the text. I plan to ad=dmore of those. Essentially almost every paragraph in TDPL should be follo=wedby an invisible snippet confirming the claims made. That way, TDPL and D would keep unity. I'll add more such invisible snippets over the winter break. I suggest th=edmd developers to focus on the bug reports marked with [tdpl] in title. Thanks, Andrei
Jan 01 2012
Progress status at the end of 2011. Issue 3235 - [tdpl] Function literals must be deduced as "function" or "delegate"Issue 5605 - [tdpl] foreach with ranges doesn't support opSlice() Issue 6714 - [tdpl] Type inference for parameters of function and delegate literals Issue 7133 - [tdpl] There should be no empty statement =A0 =A0RESOLVED FIXED! Issue 1528 - [tdpl] overloading template and non-template functions Issue 2972 - [tdpl] Can't overload non-templated function against template Issue 4573 - [tdpl] Specialized functions conflict with generic function =A0 =A0They are duplications each other Issue 7131 - [tdpl] Hijacking detected where it doesn't exist =A0 =A0This is a bit related to above three. =A0 =A0The problem is that the template function overloadings does not calculate 'overload set'. Issue 3382 - [tdpl] Implement uniform function call syntax Issue 3836 - [tdpl] obligatory override attribute Issue 4596 - [tdpl] Rebinding *this* in class method compiles Issue 4675 - [tdpl] Eponymous Template should hide internal names =A0 =A0Patches already posted, but not yet merged. Issue 4101 - [tdpl] DMD doesn't give error when goto skips initialization Issue 4595 - [tdpl] Accessing non-static member of a null reference compile= s =A0 =A0Static analysis features. Issue 4542 - [tdpl] TDPL NVI example results in linker error Issue 6176 - [tdpl] Cannot use string variables in case expressions =A0 =A0Still discussed in bugzilla? Issue 7135 - [tdpl] Multiple delegate-related issues (literal syntax, system deduction) =A0 =A0TDPL code problem? (IMHO) Issue 4423 - [tdpl] enums of struct types Issue 4523 - [tdpl] .remove method for Associative Arrays returns void in all cases Issue 4576 - [tdpl] 0/1 argument calls to overloaded function is allowed in presence of variadic function Issue 6083 - [tdpl] There can be only one alias this. Issue 7132 - [tdpl] Exponential operator ^^ for integrals does not compile without any import =A0 =A0... Kenji Hara 2011/12/23 Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org>:I've recently finished marking all sample code in TDPL that won't current=lywork. See http://goo.gl/9sSXP I've also added a few invisible samples - code that is not present in the text, but is implied to work by statements made in the text. I plan to ad=dmore of those. Essentially almost every paragraph in TDPL should be follo=wedby an invisible snippet confirming the claims made. That way, TDPL and D would keep unity. I'll add more such invisible snippets over the winter break. I suggest th=edmd developers to focus on the bug reports marked with [tdpl] in title. Thanks, Andrei
Jan 01 2012