www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - Associative Array Initializers

reply Joseph Bell <josephabell tx.rr.com> writes:
Another question regarding arrays, this time associative arrays.

int[char[]] months = ["Jan" : 1, "Feb" : 2,

etc. definitely doesn't work as intended, that is supplying a 
initializing set of keys and values.

Does D currently support an initialization syntax for associative arrays?

Thanks,
Joe
Jan 21 2007
parent reply Frits van Bommel <fvbommel REMwOVExCAPSs.nl> writes:
Joseph Bell wrote:

 Does D currently support an initialization syntax for associative arrays?


No, that's one of the big missing things.
Jan 21 2007
parent reply Serg Kovrov <kovrov no.spam> writes:
Frits van Bommel wrote:

 No, that's one of the big missing things.


Exactly!

-- 
serg.
Jan 22 2007
parent reply Bill Baxter <dnewsgroup billbaxter.com> writes:
Serg Kovrov wrote:

 Frits van Bommel wrote:

 No, that's one of the big missing things.


 
 Exactly!
 


Seems like with tuples now it might be possible to make a function that 
would do the trick:

int[char[]] months = AA("Jan", 1, "Feb", 2, "Mar", 3);

This could be another interesting challenge akin to Andrei's max() 
challenge.  Write a function that constructs an AA from it's arguments 
using the "best" types.

For that matter it would be interesting to see a template which 
constructs an array using the best type to hold the arguments (as 
opposed to just the type of the first argument).

--bb
Jan 22 2007
next sibling parent reply Joseph Bell <josephabell tx.rr.com> writes:
Certainly, anything is possible, but honestly, its a headache.  Is there 
a specific forum or tracking mechanism to monitor or provide input on 
language feature requests?  From the previous posts to this thread it 
seems this one would be a candidate for a subsequent revision.

Joe

Bill Baxter wrote:

 Serg Kovrov wrote:

 Frits van Bommel wrote:

 No, that's one of the big missing things.


 Exactly!


 
 Seems like with tuples now it might be possible to make a function that 
 would do the trick:
 
 int[char[]] months = AA("Jan", 1, "Feb", 2, "Mar", 3);
 
 This could be another interesting challenge akin to Andrei's max() 
 challenge.  Write a function that constructs an AA from it's arguments 
 using the "best" types.
 
 For that matter it would be interesting to see a template which 
 constructs an array using the best type to hold the arguments (as 
 opposed to just the type of the first argument).
 
 --bb
Jan 22 2007
parent Bill Baxter <dnewsgroup billbaxter.com> writes:
Joseph Bell wrote:

 
 Certainly, anything is possible, but honestly, its a headache.  Is there 
 a specific forum or tracking mechanism to monitor or provide input on 
 language feature requests?  From the previous posts to this thread it 
 seems this one would be a candidate for a subsequent revision.


Yep.  There's a bugzilla:
   http://d.puremagic.com/issues/

I'd bet that a request for an assoc array  literal syntax is already in 
there.

--bb
Jan 22 2007
prev sibling next sibling parent Chris Nicholson-Sauls <ibisbasenji gmail.com> writes:
Bill Baxter wrote:

 Serg Kovrov wrote:

 Frits van Bommel wrote:

 No, that's one of the big missing things.


 Exactly!


 
 Seems like with tuples now it might be possible to make a function that 
 would do the trick:
 
 int[char[]] months = AA("Jan", 1, "Feb", 2, "Mar", 3);
 
 This could be another interesting challenge akin to Andrei's max() 
 challenge.  Write a function that constructs an AA from it's arguments 
 using the "best" types.
 
 For that matter it would be interesting to see a template which 
 constructs an array using the best type to hold the arguments (as 
 opposed to just the type of the first argument).
 
 --bb


I actually have an Assoc! template in Cashew for this, except the syntax is:
int[char[]] months = Assoc!(
   ["Jan", "Feb", "Mar"],
   [1    , 2    , 3    ]
);

Your "inline" means might be better, though, now that we have Tuples.

Also, for the moment, the "workaround" is to initialize the associative array
in a module 
constructor.  I would love to see this fixed ASAP.  (Feels like such a sore
spot.)

-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls
Jan 22 2007
prev sibling parent reply Kevin Bealer <kevinbealer gmail.com> writes:
Bill Baxter wrote:

 Serg Kovrov wrote:

 Frits van Bommel wrote:

 No, that's one of the big missing things.


 Exactly!


 
 Seems like with tuples now it might be possible to make a function that 
 would do the trick:
 
 int[char[]] months = AA("Jan", 1, "Feb", 2, "Mar", 3);
 
 This could be another interesting challenge akin to Andrei's max() 
 challenge.  Write a function that constructs an AA from it's arguments 
 using the "best" types.
 
 For that matter it would be interesting to see a template which 
 constructs an array using the best type to hold the arguments (as 
 opposed to just the type of the first argument).
 
 --bb


I don't know why all this syntax is needed; in particular, without the 
a.dup, it crashes.  I don't know why -- it might be a bug or just a bad 
assumption on my part.

// -*- c++ -*-

import std.stdio;
import std.string;
import std.traits;

template AA_types(E...) {
     static if(isStaticArray!(typeof(E[0]))) {
         alias typeof(E[0].init)[] AA_key;
         alias typeof(E[1])        AA_value;
         alias AA_value[AA_key]    AA_type;
     } else {
         alias typeof(E[0])     AA_key;
         alias typeof(E[1])     AA_value;
         alias AA_value[AA_key] AA_type;
     }

}

AA_types!(E).AA_type AA(E...)(E values)
{
     static assert(values.length);
     static assert((values.length % 2) == 0);

     alias AA_types!(E).AA_key   TKey;
     alias AA_types!(E).AA_value TValue;
     alias AA_types!(E).AA_type  TArray;

     TKey   K;
     TArray rv;

     foreach(i, a; values) {
         static if ((i & 1) == 0) {
             static if (is(typeof(a.length))) {
                 K = a.dup;
             } else {
                 K = a;
             }
         }
         static if ((i & 1) == 1) {
             rv[K] = a;
         }
     }


     return rv;
}

int main(char[][] args)
{
     auto f = AA("run", 2, "the", 1, "you long", 4);

     foreach(i, a; f) {
         writefln("%s -> %s", i, a);
     }

     return 0;
}
Jan 25 2007
parent reply Bill Baxter <dnewsgroup billbaxter.com> writes:
Kevin Bealer wrote:

 Bill Baxter wrote:

 Serg Kovrov wrote:

 Frits van Bommel wrote:

 No, that's one of the big missing things.


 Exactly!


 Seems like with tuples now it might be possible to make a function 
 that would do the trick:

 int[char[]] months = AA("Jan", 1, "Feb", 2, "Mar", 3);

 This could be another interesting challenge akin to Andrei's max() 
 challenge.  Write a function that constructs an AA from it's arguments 
 using the "best" types.

 For that matter it would be interesting to see a template which 
 constructs an array using the best type to hold the arguments (as 
 opposed to just the type of the first argument).

 --bb


 
 I don't know why all this syntax is needed; in particular, without the 
 a.dup, it crashes.  I don't know why -- it might be a bug or just a bad 
 assumption on my part.


make it 'inout a', maybe?

--bb
Jan 25 2007
parent reply Kevin Bealer <kevinbealer gmail.com> writes:
Bill Baxter wrote:

 Kevin Bealer wrote:

 Bill Baxter wrote:

 Serg Kovrov wrote:

 Frits van Bommel wrote:

 No, that's one of the big missing things.


 Exactly!


 Seems like with tuples now it might be possible to make a function 
 that would do the trick:

 int[char[]] months = AA("Jan", 1, "Feb", 2, "Mar", 3);

 This could be another interesting challenge akin to Andrei's max() 
 challenge.  Write a function that constructs an AA from it's 
 arguments using the "best" types.

 For that matter it would be interesting to see a template which 
 constructs an array using the best type to hold the arguments (as 
 opposed to just the type of the first argument).

 --bb


 I don't know why all this syntax is needed; in particular, without the 
 a.dup, it crashes.  I don't know why -- it might be a bug or just a 
 bad assumption on my part.


 
 make it 'inout a', maybe?
 
 --bb


I haven't checked to see whether that works - but even if it does, I 
still don't see *why* it's more legal.

Kevin
Jan 25 2007
next sibling parent Bill Baxter <dnewsgroup billbaxter.com> writes:
Kevin Bealer wrote:

 Bill Baxter wrote:

 Kevin Bealer wrote:

 Bill Baxter wrote:

 Serg Kovrov wrote:

 Frits van Bommel wrote:

 No, that's one of the big missing things.


 Exactly!


 Seems like with tuples now it might be possible to make a function 
 that would do the trick:

 int[char[]] months = AA("Jan", 1, "Feb", 2, "Mar", 3);

 This could be another interesting challenge akin to Andrei's max() 
 challenge.  Write a function that constructs an AA from it's 
 arguments using the "best" types.

 For that matter it would be interesting to see a template which 
 constructs an array using the best type to hold the arguments (as 
 opposed to just the type of the first argument).

 --bb


 I don't know why all this syntax is needed; in particular, without 
 the a.dup, it crashes.  I don't know why -- it might be a bug or just 
 a bad assumption on my part.


 make it 'inout a', maybe?

 --bb


 
 I haven't checked to see whether that works - but even if it does, I 
 still don't see *why* it's more legal.
 
 Kevin


Well it doesn't work.  You can't just say inout a, and since you don't 
know the type you can't use "inout Type a".
But looking at it again, I'm not sure why I thought that would work in 
the first place.

--bb
Jan 25 2007
prev sibling parent Bill Baxter <dnewsgroup billbaxter.com> writes:
Kevin Bealer wrote:

 Bill Baxter wrote:

 Kevin Bealer wrote:

 Bill Baxter wrote:

 Serg Kovrov wrote:

 Frits van Bommel wrote:

 No, that's one of the big missing things.


 Exactly!


 Seems like with tuples now it might be possible to make a function 
 that would do the trick:

 int[char[]] months = AA("Jan", 1, "Feb", 2, "Mar", 3);

 This could be another interesting challenge akin to Andrei's max() 
 challenge.  Write a function that constructs an AA from it's 
 arguments using the "best" types.

 For that matter it would be interesting to see a template which 
 constructs an array using the best type to hold the arguments (as 
 opposed to just the type of the first argument).

 --bb


 I don't know why all this syntax is needed; in particular, without 
 the a.dup, it crashes.  I don't know why -- it might be a bug or just 
 a bad assumption on my part.


 make it 'inout a', maybe?

 --bb


 
 I haven't checked to see whether that works - but even if it does, I 
 still don't see *why* it's more legal.
 
 Kevin


How about this, though:

     foreach(i, a; values) {
         static if ((i & 1) == 1) {
             rv[ values[i-1] ] = a;
         }
     }


Seems to work.

--bb
Jan 25 2007