digitalmars.D - About the new website

Lloyd Dupont (3/3) Jun 24 2011 Congrats, looks much nicer and appealing.

Walter Bright (2/4) Jun 24 2011 I like it too! Thanks to David, Andrei, and all who helped create it.
dsimcha (3/6) Jun 25 2011 Just one point I wanted to take this opportunity to mention:

Thomas Mader (23/29) Jun 27 2011 There is a small error on the index page.
Thomas Mader (2/31) Jun 27 2011

KennyTM~ (6/42) Jun 27 2011 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/index.html:

Jonathan M Davis (4/5) Jun 27 2011 If you see any errors on the website, you should report them in bugzilla...
Thomas Mader (2/7) Jun 28 2011
Lars T. Kyllingstad (6/14) Jun 29 2011 I fixed this a little while ago:

"Lloyd Dupont" <ld-REMOVE galador.net> writes:

Congrats, looks much nicer and appealing.
The library documentation seems more readable as well (in my humble 
opinion)!

Jun 24 2011

Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> writes:

On 6/24/2011 6:25 PM, Lloyd Dupont wrote:
 Congrats, looks much nicer and appealing.
 The library documentation seems more readable as well (in my humble opinion)!

I like it too! Thanks to David, Andrei, and all who helped create it.

Jun 24 2011

dsimcha <dsimcha yahoo.com> writes:

On 6/24/2011 9:25 PM, Lloyd Dupont wrote:
 Congrats, looks much nicer and appealing.
 The library documentation seems more readable as well (in my humble
 opinion)!

Just one point I wanted to take this opportunity to mention:

std.parallelism and std.net.isemail **STILL** aren't up on the new website.

Jun 25 2011

Thomas Mader <thomas.mader gmail.com> writes:

There is a small error on the index page.

There are currently four implementations:
*"There are currently four implementations:"*

but there are only *three* implementations listed.

Thomas

 There are currently four implementationsc

There are currently four implementations:

There are currently four implementations:

   1. Digital Mars dmd for
Windows<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>,
   x86 Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS
X<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>,
   and x86 FreeBSD <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
   2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
   3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.

There are currently four implementations:

   1. Digital Mars dmd for
Windows<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>,
   x86 Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS
X<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>,
   and x86 FreeBSD <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
   2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
   3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.

There are currently four implementations:
    1. Digital Mars dmd for
Windows<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>,
    x86 Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS
X<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>,
    and x86 FreeBSD <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
    2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
    3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.

Jun 27 2011

Thomas Mader <thomas.mader gmail.com> writes:

ok I should not use gmail for composing anymore. :)

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Thomas Mader <thomas.mader gmail.com>wrote:

 There is a small error on the index page.

 There are currently four implementations:
 *"There are currently four implementations:"*

 but there are only *three* implementations listed.

 Thomas

 There are currently four implementationsc

 There are currently four implementations:

 There are currently four implementations:

    1. Digital Mars dmd for
Windows<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>,
    x86 Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS
X<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>,
    and x86 FreeBSD <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
    2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
    3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.

 There are currently four implementations:

    1. Digital Mars dmd for
Windows<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>,
    x86 Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS
X<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>,
    and x86 FreeBSD <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
    2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
    3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.

 There are currently four implementations:
    1. Digital Mars dmd for
Windows<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>,
    x86 Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS
X<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>,
    and x86 FreeBSD <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
    2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
    3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.

Jun 27 2011

KennyTM~ <kennytm gmail.com> writes:

On Jun 27, 11 19:32, Thomas Mader wrote:
 ok I should not use gmail for composing anymore. :)

 On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Thomas Mader <thomas.mader gmail.com
 <mailto:thomas.mader gmail.com>> wrote:

     There is a small error on the index page.

     There are currently four implementations:
     /"There are currently *four* implementations:"/

     but there are only *three* implementations listed.

     Thomas

         There are currently four implementationsc

     There are currently four implementations:

     There are currently four implementations:

      1. Digital Mars dmd for Windows
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, x86 Linux
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS X
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, and x86 FreeBSD
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
      2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
      3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.

     There are currently four implementations:

      1. Digital Mars dmd for Windows
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, x86 Linux
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS X
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, and x86 FreeBSD
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
      2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
      3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.

         There are currently four implementations:

          1. Digital Mars dmd for Windows
             <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, x86
             Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac
             OS X <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, and
             x86 FreeBSD
             <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
          2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
          3. Gnu D compiler gdc
             <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/index.html:

4. D.NET compiler alpha for .NET for D version 2. 
<http://dnet.codeplex.com/>

However, this is no longer updated starting from 2009, so I don't think 
this should be listed in d-p-l.org.

Jun 27 2011

"Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg gmx.com> writes:

On 2011-06-27 04:31, Thomas Mader wrote:
 There is a small error on the index page.

If you see any errors on the website, you should report them in bugzilla: 
d.puremagic.com/issues

- Jonathan M Davis

Jun 27 2011

Thomas Mader <thomas.mader gmail.com> writes:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6219

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com>wrote:

 On 2011-06-27 04:31, Thomas Mader wrote:
 There is a small error on the index page.

 If you see any errors on the website, you should report them in bugzilla:
 d.puremagic.com/issues

 - Jonathan M Davis

Jun 28 2011

"Lars T. Kyllingstad" <public kyllingen.NOSPAMnet> writes:

On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 18:39:25 -0400, dsimcha wrote:

 On 6/24/2011 9:25 PM, Lloyd Dupont wrote:
 Congrats, looks much nicer and appealing. The library documentation
 seems more readable as well (in my humble opinion)!

 
 Just one point I wanted to take this opportunity to mention:
 
 std.parallelism and std.net.isemail **STILL** aren't up on the new
 website.

I fixed this a little while ago:

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/
pull/12

The web site just needs to be updated.

-Lars

Jun 29 2011

D Programming

C/C++ Programming

Other

digitalmars.D - About the new website