• Interested (4/4) Aug 23 2004 I have seen on the "D Change Log" page that version 0.99 has evolved to ...
• Sean Kelly (4/8) Aug 23 2004 Old topic :) The dot in version numbers should be read as a separator, ...

Interested <Interested_member pathlink.com> writes:

I have seen on the "D Change Log" page that version 0.99 has evolved to version
0.100 instead of 1.00, which looks like a typo to me. I firmly reject any
thoughts that it was lack of confidence in the new version which has caused this
special numbering scheme!?    ; )

Sean Kelly <sean f4.ca> writes:

In article <cgcnpt$2cjm$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Interested says...
I have seen on the "D Change Log" page that version 0.99 has evolved to version
0.100 instead of 1.00, which looks like a typo to me. I firmly reject any
thoughts that it was lack of confidence in the new version which has caused this
special numbering scheme!?    ; )

Old topic :)  The dot in version numbers should be read as a separator, not an
indication that the number is in decimal notation.


Sean