• Sean Kelly (25/25) Jul 24 2004 I think it's a tad odd that this compiles:
• Nick (18/30) Jul 24 2004 Well, considering that the following just compiled and ran:

Sean Kelly <sean f4.ca> writes:

I think it's a tad odd that this compiles:












I had assumed that thhis was the equivalent of the C++ code:












ie. that it forced the user to implement the functions and the bodies were
provided as defaults.

Sean

Nick <Nick_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <cducnr$1731$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Sean Kelly says...
I think it's a tad odd that this compiles:











[snip]

Well, considering that the following just compiled and ran:














I'd say it looks like the 'abstract' attribute is completely ignored when you
specify a function body. The docs are painfully low on details about the
'abstract' attribute, so I'm not really sure if this classifies as a bug :)

Nick