• Simon Hobbs (44/44) Jul 03 2004 Hey chaps,
• Charlie (5/49) Jul 03 2004 Im not sure debug and inline work together, and how did u get embedded d...
• Lisa Hobbs (8/80) Jul 03 2004 Oops, I did actually have the -g flag on the command line as well. I jus...
• Walter (9/53) Jul 03 2004 Right now, initializers aren't inline expanded. So if you wrote:

Simon Hobbs <Simon_member pathlink.com> writes:

Hey chaps,

Inlining doesn't seem to be working in v0.94. I've reduced the problem to this
test program because it wasn't inlining a bunch of proper code:


import std.random;

int MulBy2(int a)
{
return a * 2;
}

int main ( char [] [] args ) 
{
int x = rand();
int y = MulBy2(x);
return y;
}


I'm using this command line:

c:\dmd\bin\dmd.exe test.d -O -release -inline -oftest.exe


And it doesn't inline the call to MulBy2.
Here's the debugger mixed source/disassembly window:


--- test.d --------------------------------------------------------------------

import std.random;

int MulBy2(int a)
00402010  add         eax,eax 
{
return a * 2;
}
00402012  ret              
00402013  int         3    

int main ( char [] [] args ) 
00402014  push        eax  
{
int x = rand();
int y = MulBy2(x);
00402015  call        _D3std6random4randFZk (402114h) 
0040201A  call         (402010h)
return y;
}
0040201F  pop         ecx  
--- No source file ------------------------------------------------------------
00402020  ret              
00402021  int         3    
00402022  int         3    
00402023  int         3




Why isn't it inlining, please?

Si

Charlie <Charlie_member pathlink.com> writes:

Im not sure debug and inline work together, and how did u get embedded debug
info without including the proper flags ?

You might want to try compiling to obj and using obj2asm.

C

In article <cc6nnr$tct$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Simon Hobbs says...
Hey chaps,

Inlining doesn't seem to be working in v0.94. I've reduced the problem to this
test program because it wasn't inlining a bunch of proper code:


import std.random;

int MulBy2(int a)
{
return a * 2;
}

int main ( char [] [] args ) 
{
int x = rand();
int y = MulBy2(x);
return y;
}


I'm using this command line:

c:\dmd\bin\dmd.exe test.d -O -release -inline -oftest.exe


And it doesn't inline the call to MulBy2.
Here's the debugger mixed source/disassembly window:


--- test.d --------------------------------------------------------------------

import std.random;

int MulBy2(int a)
00402010  add         eax,eax 
{
return a * 2;
}
00402012  ret              
00402013  int         3    

int main ( char [] [] args ) 
00402014  push        eax  
{
int x = rand();
int y = MulBy2(x);
00402015  call        _D3std6random4randFZk (402114h) 
0040201A  call         (402010h)
return y;
}
0040201F  pop         ecx  
--- No source file ------------------------------------------------------------
00402020  ret              
00402021  int         3    
00402022  int         3    
00402023  int         3




Why isn't it inlining, please?

Si

"Lisa Hobbs" <lisa.hobbs1 ntlworld.com> writes:

Oops, I did actually have the -g flag on the command line as well. I just
typed it out wrongly in my post


"Charlie" <Charlie_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:cc6pep$vv5$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Im not sure debug and inline work together, and how did u get embedded

debug
 info without including the proper flags ?

 You might want to try compiling to obj and using obj2asm.

 C

 In article <cc6nnr$tct$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Simon Hobbs says...
Hey chaps,

Inlining doesn't seem to be working in v0.94. I've reduced the problem to


this
test program because it wasn't inlining a bunch of proper code:


import std.random;

int MulBy2(int a)
{
return a * 2;
}

int main ( char [] [] args )
{
int x = rand();
int y = MulBy2(x);
return y;
}


I'm using this command line:

c:\dmd\bin\dmd.exe test.d -O -release -inline -oftest.exe


And it doesn't inline the call to MulBy2.
Here's the debugger mixed source/disassembly window:


--- 


test.d --------------------------------------------------------------------
import std.random;

int MulBy2(int a)
00402010  add         eax,eax
{
return a * 2;
}
00402012  ret
00402013  int         3

int main ( char [] [] args )
00402014  push        eax
{
int x = rand();
int y = MulBy2(x);
00402015  call        _D3std6random4randFZk (402114h)
0040201A  call         (402010h)
return y;
}
0040201F  pop         ecx
--- No source


file ------------------------------------------------------------
00402020  ret
00402021  int         3
00402022  int         3
00402023  int         3




Why isn't it inlining, please?

Si

"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

Right now, initializers aren't inline expanded. So if you wrote:
    int y;
    y = MulBy2(x);
it will inline expand.


"Simon Hobbs" <Simon_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:cc6nnr$tct$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Hey chaps,

 Inlining doesn't seem to be working in v0.94. I've reduced the problem to

this
 test program because it wasn't inlining a bunch of proper code:


 import std.random;

 int MulBy2(int a)
 {
 return a * 2;
 }

 int main ( char [] [] args )
 {
 int x = rand();
 int y = MulBy2(x);
 return y;
 }


 I'm using this command line:

 c:\dmd\bin\dmd.exe test.d -O -release -inline -oftest.exe


 And it doesn't inline the call to MulBy2.
 Here's the debugger mixed source/disassembly window:


 --- 

test.d --------------------------------------------------------------------
 import std.random;

 int MulBy2(int a)
 00402010  add         eax,eax
 {
 return a * 2;
 }
 00402012  ret
 00402013  int         3

 int main ( char [] [] args )
 00402014  push        eax
 {
 int x = rand();
 int y = MulBy2(x);
 00402015  call        _D3std6random4randFZk (402114h)
 0040201A  call         (402010h)
 return y;
 }
 0040201F  pop         ecx
 --- No source

file ------------------------------------------------------------
 00402020  ret
 00402021  int         3
 00402022  int         3
 00402023  int         3




 Why isn't it inlining, please?

 Si