digitalmars.D - 50% inative
- duff (3/3) Nov 24 2015 If I look at the list of people in the dlang organisation, 50 %
- duff (4/7) Nov 24 2015 If I look at the list of people in the dlang organisation, 50 %
- duff (2/10) Nov 24 2015 Staline would say: it's time to clean up.
- Ilya Yaroshenko (4/16) Nov 24 2015 Stalin*.
- duff (13/25) Nov 24 2015 https://github.com/shoo?tab=activity
- duff (4/31) Nov 24 2015 If at least they would be able to find some regressions when a
- David DeWitt (5/28) Nov 24 2015 Some of those ppl have contributed greatly to D and probably
- duff (6/37) Nov 24 2015 I understand that J.Sayol has done a great job in the past, but
- Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d (9/54) Nov 25 2015 If members wish to leave, they may request to do so. Ousting people is ...
- Jonathan M Davis (13/16) Nov 25 2015 +infinity
- Andy Smith (3/19) Nov 25 2015 Well said :-)
- lobo (2/12) Nov 25 2015 don't feed the trolls :-)
- Andrei Alexandrescu (3/19) Nov 25 2015 That's exactly right. No need to dignify such interventions with a
- tcak (3/20) Nov 24 2015 Hey, those who don't have activity. Either work, or we will stop
- Brad Anderson (3/6) Nov 24 2015 Interest and contributions, even from core members, often comes
- duff (3/10) Nov 24 2015 burst of interest for people who are constantly interested ?
If I look at the list of people in the dlang organisation, 50 % haven't done anything in the that 2 monthes... no review, no merge, no commit, nothing...
Nov 24 2015
On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:47:55 UTC, duff wrote:If I look at the list of people in the dlang organisation, 50 % haven't done anything in the that 2 monthes... no review, no merge, no commit, nothing...If I look at the list of people in the dlang organisation, 50 % haven't done anything in the >>last<< 2 monthes... no review, no merge, no commit, nothing..
Nov 24 2015
On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:49:07 UTC, duff wrote:On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:47:55 UTC, duff wrote:Staline would say: it's time to clean up.If I look at the list of people in the dlang organisation, 50 % haven't done anything in the that 2 monthes... no review, no merge, no commit, nothing...If I look at the list of people in the dlang organisation, 50 % haven't done anything in the >>last<< 2 monthes... no review, no merge, no commit, nothing..
Nov 24 2015
On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:51:58 UTC, duff wrote:On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:49:07 UTC, duff wrote:Stalin*. I suppose that you can try to offer this again after and if you become a member of D core team ;-)On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:47:55 UTC, duff wrote:Staline would say: it's time to clean up.If I look at the list of people in the dlang organisation, 50 % haven't done anything in the that 2 monthes... no review, no merge, no commit, nothing...If I look at the list of people in the dlang organisation, 50 % haven't done anything in the >>last<< 2 monthes... no review, no merge, no commit, nothing..
Nov 24 2015
On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:51:58 UTC, duff wrote:On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:49:07 UTC, duff wrote:https://github.com/shoo?tab=activity https://github.com/complexmath?tab=activity https://github.com/jordisayol?tab=activity https://github.com/donc?tab=activity https://github.com/repeatedly?tab=activity https://github.com/dsimcha?tab=activity etc... Among those, nobody takes the time to review and merge the simple fixes related to ddoc or things like that. Among those, nobody takes the time to read bugzilla and to fix the simple bugs whose fixes are constantly proposed by external people who gotta wait because among those people there is no activity.On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:47:55 UTC, duff wrote:Staline would say: it's time to clean up.If I look at the list of people in the dlang organisation, 50 % haven't done anything in the that 2 monthes... no review, no merge, no commit, nothing...If I look at the list of people in the dlang organisation, 50 % haven't done anything in the >>last<< 2 monthes... no review, no merge, no commit, nothing..
Nov 24 2015
On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 17:10:09 UTC, duff wrote:On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:51:58 UTC, duff wrote:If at least they would be able to find some regressions when a new release comes...but no. Idle people. Useless people.On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:49:07 UTC, duff wrote:https://github.com/shoo?tab=activity https://github.com/complexmath?tab=activity https://github.com/jordisayol?tab=activity https://github.com/donc?tab=activity https://github.com/repeatedly?tab=activity https://github.com/dsimcha?tab=activity etc... Among those, nobody takes the time to review and merge the simple fixes related to ddoc or things like that. Among those, nobody takes the time to read bugzilla and to fix the simple bugs whose fixes are constantly proposed by external people who gotta wait because among those people there is no activity.On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:47:55 UTC, duff wrote:Staline would say: it's time to clean up.If I look at the list of people in the dlang organisation, 50 % haven't done anything in the that 2 monthes... no review, no merge, no commit, nothing...If I look at the list of people in the dlang organisation, 50 % haven't done anything in the >>last<< 2 monthes... no review, no merge, no commit, nothing..
Nov 24 2015
On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 17:35:54 UTC, duff wrote:On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 17:10:09 UTC, duff wrote:Some of those ppl have contributed greatly to D and probably still do behind the scenes so I doubt they deserve to be "removed" from the D organization and would even be considered for removal if anything more people need to get involved.On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:51:58 UTC, duff wrote:If at least they would be able to find some regressions when a new release comes...but no. Idle people. Useless people.On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:49:07 UTC, duff wrote: Staline would say: it's time to clean up.https://github.com/shoo?tab=activity https://github.com/complexmath?tab=activity https://github.com/jordisayol?tab=activity https://github.com/donc?tab=activity https://github.com/repeatedly?tab=activity https://github.com/dsimcha?tab=activity etc... Among those, nobody takes the time to review and merge the simple fixes related to ddoc or things like that. Among those, nobody takes the time to read bugzilla and to fix the simple bugs whose fixes are constantly proposed by external people who gotta wait because among those people there is no activity.
Nov 24 2015
On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 17:47:01 UTC, David DeWitt wrote:On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 17:35:54 UTC, duff wrote:I understand that J.Sayol has done a great job in the past, but except this work for the installer...I don't get why do you keep such people in your organisation. I mean that it appened to me to make some small things for "Him" or "Her"...but i'm not member of their companies...On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 17:10:09 UTC, duff wrote:Some of those ppl have contributed greatly to D and probably still do behind the scenes so I doubt they deserve to be "removed" from the D organization and would even be considered for removal if anything more people need to get involved.On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:51:58 UTC, duff wrote:If at least they would be able to find some regressions when a new release comes...but no. Idle people. Useless people.On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:49:07 UTC, duff wrote: Staline would say: it's time to clean up.https://github.com/shoo?tab=activity https://github.com/complexmath?tab=activity https://github.com/jordisayol?tab=activity https://github.com/donc?tab=activity https://github.com/repeatedly?tab=activity https://github.com/dsimcha?tab=activity etc... Among those, nobody takes the time to review and merge the simple fixes related to ddoc or things like that. Among those, nobody takes the time to read bugzilla and to fix the simple bugs whose fixes are constantly proposed by external people who gotta wait because among those people there is no activity.
Nov 24 2015
On 24 November 2015 at 19:04, duff via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 17:47:01 UTC, David DeWitt wrote:If members wish to leave, they may request to do so. Ousting people is not an acceptable attitude towards any member in our community, long standing or not. I am aware of some of whom you've chosen to be vocal about have been around or contributing for 10 years, whilst others are active but do so under a work-related github account. All attended Dconf, most on a yearly basis, where were you?On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 17:35:54 UTC, duff wrote:I understand that J.Sayol has done a great job in the past, but except this work for the installer...I don't get why do you keep such people in your organisation. I mean that it appened to me to make some small things for "Him" or "Her"...but i'm not member of their companies...On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 17:10:09 UTC, duff wrote:Some of those ppl have contributed greatly to D and probably still do behind the scenes so I doubt they deserve to be "removed" from the D organization and would even be considered for removal if anything more people need to get involved.On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:51:58 UTC, duff wrote:If at least they would be able to find some regressions when a new release comes...but no. Idle people. Useless people.On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:49:07 UTC, duff wrote: Staline would say: it's time to clean up.https://github.com/shoo?tab=activity https://github.com/complexmath?tab=activity https://github.com/jordisayol?tab=activity https://github.com/donc?tab=activity https://github.com/repeatedly?tab=activity https://github.com/dsimcha?tab=activity etc... Among those, nobody takes the time to review and merge the simple fixes related to ddoc or things like that. Among those, nobody takes the time to read bugzilla and to fix the simple bugs whose fixes are constantly proposed by external people who gotta wait because among those people there is no activity.
Nov 25 2015
On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 08:41:05 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:If members wish to leave, they may request to do so. Ousting people is not an acceptable attitude towards any member in our community, long standing or not.+infinity If we want anything, we want these folks to be contributing again, not to be ostracized. Being rude to them gains us nothing and potentially loses us a very valuable contributor permanently. They are _very_ welcome to actively contribute again whenever they are ready and willing to do so. We'd love for it to be contributing more often, but life often gets in the way, and even if any of them have decided to move on and never return, it's not like it hurts us to let them still have commit access. We want to encourage contributions, not ostracize people for not contributing on a regular basis. - Jonathan M Davis
Nov 25 2015
On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 17:34:42 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 08:41:05 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:Well said :-)[...]+infinity If we want anything, we want these folks to be contributing again, not to be ostracized. Being rude to them gains us nothing and potentially loses us a very valuable contributor permanently. They are _very_ welcome to actively contribute again whenever they are ready and willing to do so. We'd love for it to be contributing more often, but life often gets in the way, and even if any of them have decided to move on and never return, it's not like it hurts us to let them still have commit access. We want to encourage contributions, not ostracize people for not contributing on a regular basis. - Jonathan M Davis
Nov 25 2015
On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 08:41:05 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:On 24 November 2015 at 19:04, duff via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:don't feed the trolls :-)[...]If members wish to leave, they may request to do so. Ousting people is not an acceptable attitude towards any member in our community, long standing or not. I am aware of some of whom you've chosen to be vocal about have been around or contributing for 10 years, whilst others are active but do so under a work-related github account. All attended Dconf, most on a yearly basis, where were you?
Nov 25 2015
On 11/25/2015 05:07 PM, lobo wrote:On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 08:41:05 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:That's exactly right. No need to dignify such interventions with a response. -- AndreiOn 24 November 2015 at 19:04, duff via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:don't feed the trolls :-)[...]If members wish to leave, they may request to do so. Ousting people is not an acceptable attitude towards any member in our community, long standing or not. I am aware of some of whom you've chosen to be vocal about have been around or contributing for 10 years, whilst others are active but do so under a work-related github account. All attended Dconf, most on a yearly basis, where were you?
Nov 25 2015
On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 17:10:09 UTC, duff wrote:On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:51:58 UTC, duff wrote:Hey, those who don't have activity. Either work, or we will stop paying you.On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:49:07 UTC, duff wrote:https://github.com/shoo?tab=activity https://github.com/complexmath?tab=activity https://github.com/jordisayol?tab=activity https://github.com/donc?tab=activity https://github.com/repeatedly?tab=activity https://github.com/dsimcha?tab=activity etc... Among those, nobody takes the time to review and merge the simple fixes related to ddoc or things like that. Among those, nobody takes the time to read bugzilla and to fix the simple bugs whose fixes are constantly proposed by external people who gotta wait because among those people there is no activity.[...]Staline would say: it's time to clean up.
Nov 24 2015
On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:47:55 UTC, duff wrote:If I look at the list of people in the dlang organisation, 50 % haven't done anything in the that 2 monthes... no review, no merge, no commit, nothing...Interest and contributions, even from core members, often comes in bursts. There is no harm in keeping idle contributors around.
Nov 24 2015
On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 17:45:26 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 16:47:55 UTC, duff wrote:burst of interest for people who are constantly interested ? Who is in the right place ?If I look at the list of people in the dlang organisation, 50 % haven't done anything in the that 2 monthes... no review, no merge, no commit, nothing...Interest and contributions, even from core members, often comes in bursts. There is no harm in keeping idle contributors around.
Nov 24 2015