digitalmars.D - [OT] Downtime
- Stewart Gordon (21/21) Jul 27 2006 I see the digitalmars servers are up and running once again. They were
- BCS (4/23) Jul 27 2006 At my end, the DNS name "digitalmars.com" was unresolvable for a while.
- Walter Bright (8/12) Jul 27 2006 The server was up, but the T1 line to the server got accidentally turned...
- BCS (2/6) Jul 27 2006 Well, thank the man for us all!!
- Jan Knepper (8/15) Aug 01 2006 Appreciated and you're welcome!
- Jan Knepper (14/38) Aug 01 2006 DNS runs over the same pipe (T1) as the actual domain and as of such
- Jan Knepper (15/31) Aug 01 2006 That's the first domain on the system and if anything happens the
I see the digitalmars servers are up and running once again. They were down for quite a while. Are www.digitalmars.com and news.digitalmars.com the same machine? I'd guess so considering that they were down at the same time. But why is there a failure mode by which www.digitalmars.com was delivering the content of www.digitaldaemon.com instead? Speaking of downtime, it would be good if we had something on Wiki4D or somewhere, similar in concept to http://openfacts.berlios.de/index-en.phtml?title=Wikipedia_Status This would give people somewhere to go when the servers are down. It could even give people a clue of what's going on and how long it's likely to take to fix (as much as is known). Stewart. -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/M d- s:- C++ a->--- UB P+ L E W++ N+++ o K- w++ O? M V? PS- PE- Y? PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++++ h-- r-- !y ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox. Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.
Jul 27 2006
Stewart Gordon wrote:I see the digitalmars servers are up and running once again. They were down for quite a while. Are www.digitalmars.com and news.digitalmars.com the same machine? I'd guess so considering that they were down at the same time. But why is there a failure mode by which www.digitalmars.com was delivering the content of www.digitaldaemon.com instead? Speaking of downtime, it would be good if we had something on Wiki4D or somewhere, similar in concept to http://openfacts.berlios.de/index-en.phtml?title=Wikipedia_Status This would give people somewhere to go when the servers are down. It could even give people a clue of what's going on and how long it's likely to take to fix (as much as is known). Stewart.At my end, the DNS name "digitalmars.com" was unresolvable for a while. "whois" even gave me the IP 1.1.1.1 at one point. What DID happen??
Jul 27 2006
BCS wrote:At my end, the DNS name "digitalmars.com" was unresolvable for a while. "whois" even gave me the IP 1.1.1.1 at one point. What DID happen??The server was up, but the T1 line to the server got accidentally turned off by the ISP due to a bureaucratic snafu. By the time that was cleared up, the ISP office responsible for turning it back on had gone home for the day, so it had to wait until the next morning. This is the longest (by far) outage the digital mars server has had in 7 years. That's an incredibly good track record, and it's all thanks to Jan Knepper.
Jul 27 2006
Walter Bright wrote:This is the longest (by far) outage the digital mars server has had in 7 years. That's an incredibly good track record, and it's all thanks to Jan Knepper.Well, thank the man for us all!!
Jul 27 2006
Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.us> BCS wrote:Walter Bright wrote:Appreciated and you're welcome! Jan -- ManiaC++ Jan Knepper But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla... www.mozilla.orgThis is the longest (by far) outage the digital mars server has had in 7 years. That's an incredibly good track record, and it's all thanks to Jan Knepper.Well, thank the man for us all!!
Aug 01 2006
BCS wrote:Stewart Gordon wrote:DNS runs over the same pipe (T1) as the actual domain and as of such would be unreachable. whois returning 1.1.1.1 has not much do to with the pipe being down since AFAIK this information comes from the registrar. You could have issue's whois too many times which sometimes results in a block.I see the digitalmars servers are up and running once again. They were down for quite a while. Are www.digitalmars.com and news.digitalmars.com the same machine? I'd guess so considering that they were down at the same time. But why is there a failure mode by which www.digitalmars.com was delivering the content of www.digitaldaemon.com instead? Speaking of downtime, it would be good if we had something on Wiki4D or somewhere, similar in concept to http://openfacts.berlios.de/index-en.phtml?title=Wikipedia_Status This would give people somewhere to go when the servers are down. It could even give people a clue of what's going on and how long it's likely to take to fix (as much as is known). Stewart.At my end, the DNS name "digitalmars.com" was unresolvable for a while. "whois" even gave me the IP 1.1.1.1 at one point.What DID happen??Exactly what Walter told you. Thanks! Jan -- ManiaC++ Jan Knepper But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla... www.mozilla.org
Aug 01 2006
Stewart Gordon wrote:I see the digitalmars servers are up and running once again. They were down for quite a while. Are www.digitalmars.com and news.digitalmars.com the same machine?Yes they are.I'd guess so considering that they were down at the same time. But why is there a failure mode by which www.digitalmars.com was delivering the content of www.digitaldaemon.com instead?That's the first domain on the system and if anything happens the content of that domain will show.Speaking of downtime, it would be good if we had something on Wiki4D or somewhere, similar in concept to http://openfacts.berlios.de/index-en.phtml?title=Wikipedia_Status This would give people somewhere to go when the servers are down. It could even give people a clue of what's going on and how long it's likely to take to fix (as much as is known).Actually... There are talks and plans about redundancy where the site(s) would be run on several systems on different places in the US and next in EU. It is in the works, but technology has to be in-place/available and budgets have to be approved/allocated. Thanks! Jan -- ManiaC++ Jan Knepper But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla... www.mozilla.org
Aug 01 2006