c++.stlsoft - DTL, STLSoft, etc. coming soon

Matthew (21/21) May 04 2004 I've *finally* just sent off the last round of revisions of "Imperfect C...

fred (4/25) May 04 2004 Congratulations Matthew

Matthew (11/47) May 04 2004 Should be Sept/Oct.

C (5/80) May 04 2004 Whats the other book about ? Do you have something for D planned ( post...

Matthew (6/85) May 04 2004 I don't know. We'd certainly like to do it, but it may still (even after...

C (13/116) May 04 2004 Hmm, it might be a 'build it they will come' scenario. I know Id like t...

Matthew (48/172) May 04 2004 Very good point. The only problem there is that neither myself nor big-W...

Matthew (10/54) May 04 2004 first

C (5/82) May 05 2004 sweet

Brad Anderson (8/10) May 04 2004 You're talking about posting drafts of articles for TDJ? I have no

C (8/20) May 05 2004 That sounds , only drawback is no way to search for articles. But I don...

Matthew (7/31) May 05 2004 Let's see how this goes for a while. It could be the best way to start T...
Brad Anderson (5/37) May 06 2004 http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=18

Matthew (6/43) May 06 2004 Cool.

resistor AT nospam DOT mac DOT com (4/50) May 06 2004 If I get a chance, I'll LaTeX it. But I'm a bit bogged down in schoolwo...
Brad Anderson (2/57) May 06 2004

Matthew (7/64) May 06 2004 Hang on. Checking the TDJ records ...

resistor AT nospam DOT mac DOT com (5/71) May 06 2004 Bah. Just as I finish LaTeXing it too. Anyways, my typeset version it ...

Matthew (6/83) May 07 2004 Doesn't get that as a valid url. :(

resistor AT nospam DOT mac DOT com (5/92) May 07 2004 Hmm. It works locally. Might be a DNS problem. I'll email it to you d...

J C Calvarese (7/18) May 06 2004 I created a PDF (with OpenOffice.org) and put it up in the D Lab

"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:

I've *finally* just sent off the last round of revisions of "Imperfect C++",
which have occupied me for the last week or so. After two years of effort, it's
a
pretty weird feeling to know that it's over the line at last.

Anyway, apart from sharing an electronic sigh of relief, this means that the
releases of STLSoft v1.7.1 and DTL 0.1 will now be pretty imminent. Expect news
on both fronts within the next two weeks. I will also now put more effort into
getting Walter to release std.loader.d and accept my updates to
std.windows.registry.d and std.recls.d.

Thanks for patience to all who've been kind enough to wait for the libraries,
and
to those who've wished me well with the book writing. What an idiot I must have
been to have thought that I should write a book. And what an idiot for embarking
on two more this year - "Extended STL", and another that's not about C++. ;)

Cheers


-- 
Matthew Wilson

Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
    (www.synesis.com.au/articles.html#columns)
STLSoft moderator
    (http://www.stlsoft.org)

"You can tell a Yorkshireman, but you can't tell him much!" -- Uncle Michael

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 04 2004

"fred" <info fleet-manage.com> writes:

Congratulations Matthew

When will we be able to pick up a copy of your new book ?

fred


"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message
news:c785tn$267$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 I've *finally* just sent off the last round of revisions of "Imperfect C++",
 which have occupied me for the last week or so. After two years of effort,
it's a
 pretty weird feeling to know that it's over the line at last.

 Anyway, apart from sharing an electronic sigh of relief, this means that the
 releases of STLSoft v1.7.1 and DTL 0.1 will now be pretty imminent. Expect news
 on both fronts within the next two weeks. I will also now put more effort into
 getting Walter to release std.loader.d and accept my updates to
 std.windows.registry.d and std.recls.d.

 Thanks for patience to all who've been kind enough to wait for the libraries,
and
 to those who've wished me well with the book writing. What an idiot I must have
 been to have thought that I should write a book. And what an idiot for
embarking
 on two more this year - "Extended STL", and another that's not about C++. ;)

 Cheers


 -- 
 Matthew Wilson

 Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
     (www.synesis.com.au/articles.html#columns)
 STLSoft moderator
     (http://www.stlsoft.org)

 "You can tell a Yorkshireman, but you can't tell him much!" -- Uncle Michael

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 04 2004

"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:

Should be Sept/Oct.

It could be later if I can't find a decent subtitle for it. ;/




"fred" <info fleet-manage.com> wrote in message
news:c79ahr$1rra$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Congratulations Matthew

 When will we be able to pick up a copy of your new book ?

 fred


 "Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message

news:c785tn$267$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 I've *finally* just sent off the last round of revisions of "Imperfect C++",
 which have occupied me for the last week or so. After two years of effort,


it's a
 pretty weird feeling to know that it's over the line at last.

 Anyway, apart from sharing an electronic sigh of relief, this means that the
 releases of STLSoft v1.7.1 and DTL 0.1 will now be pretty imminent. Expect


news
 on both fronts within the next two weeks. I will also now put more effort


into
 getting Walter to release std.loader.d and accept my updates to
 std.windows.registry.d and std.recls.d.

 Thanks for patience to all who've been kind enough to wait for the libraries,


and
 to those who've wished me well with the book writing. What an idiot I must


have
 been to have thought that I should write a book. And what an idiot for


embarking
 on two more this year - "Extended STL", and another that's not about C++. ;)

 Cheers


 -- 
 Matthew Wilson

 Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
     (www.synesis.com.au/articles.html#columns)
 STLSoft moderator
     (http://www.stlsoft.org)

 "You can tell a Yorkshireman, but you can't tell him much!" -- Uncle Michael

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 04 2004

C <dont respond.com> writes:

Whats the other book about ?  Do you have something for D planned ( post 
1.0 maybe  :) ) ?

Also slightly OT , is The D Journal still in the works ?

C
Matthew wrote:
 Should be Sept/Oct.
 
 It could be later if I can't find a decent subtitle for it. ;/
 
 
 
 
 "fred" <info fleet-manage.com> wrote in message
 news:c79ahr$1rra$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 
Congratulations Matthew

When will we be able to pick up a copy of your new book ?

fred


"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message

 
 news:c785tn$267$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 
I've *finally* just sent off the last round of revisions of "Imperfect C++",
which have occupied me for the last week or so. After two years of effort,


 
 it's a
 
pretty weird feeling to know that it's over the line at last.

Anyway, apart from sharing an electronic sigh of relief, this means that the
releases of STLSoft v1.7.1 and DTL 0.1 will now be pretty imminent. Expect


 
 news
 
on both fronts within the next two weeks. I will also now put more effort


 
 into
 
getting Walter to release std.loader.d and accept my updates to
std.windows.registry.d and std.recls.d.

Thanks for patience to all who've been kind enough to wait for the libraries,


 
 and
 
to those who've wished me well with the book writing. What an idiot I must


 
 have
 
been to have thought that I should write a book. And what an idiot for


 
 embarking
 
on two more this year - "Extended STL", and another that's not about C++. ;)

Cheers


-- 
Matthew Wilson

Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
    (www.synesis.com.au/articles.html#columns)
STLSoft moderator
    (http://www.stlsoft.org)

"You can tell a Yorkshireman, but you can't tell him much!" -- Uncle Michael

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 04 2004

"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:

 Whats the other book about ?  Do you have something for D planned ( post
 1.0 maybe  :) ) ?

It's a wait and see thing, as the proposal's not yet in to the publisher. But it
won't be long

 Also slightly OT , is The D Journal still in the works ?

I don't know. We'd certainly like to do it, but it may still (even after two
years) be premature. Everybody says they'd like to read it, but there are very
few who want to, or, more likely, have the time to, write for it.



 Matthew wrote:
 Should be Sept/Oct.

 It could be later if I can't find a decent subtitle for it. ;/




 "fred" <info fleet-manage.com> wrote in message
 news:c79ahr$1rra$1 digitaldaemon.com...

Congratulations Matthew

When will we be able to pick up a copy of your new book ?

fred


"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message

 news:c785tn$267$1 digitaldaemon.com...

I've *finally* just sent off the last round of revisions of "Imperfect C++",
which have occupied me for the last week or so. After two years of effort,


 it's a

pretty weird feeling to know that it's over the line at last.

Anyway, apart from sharing an electronic sigh of relief, this means that the
releases of STLSoft v1.7.1 and DTL 0.1 will now be pretty imminent. Expect


 news

on both fronts within the next two weeks. I will also now put more effort


 into

getting Walter to release std.loader.d and accept my updates to
std.windows.registry.d and std.recls.d.

Thanks for patience to all who've been kind enough to wait for the




libraries,
 and

to those who've wished me well with the book writing. What an idiot I must


 have

been to have thought that I should write a book. And what an idiot for


 embarking

on two more this year - "Extended STL", and another that's not about C++. ;)

Cheers


-- 
Matthew Wilson

Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
    (www.synesis.com.au/articles.html#columns)
STLSoft moderator
    (http://www.stlsoft.org)

"You can tell a Yorkshireman, but you can't tell him much!" -- Uncle Michael



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 04 2004

C <qbert atari-soldiers.com> writes:

 I don't know. We'd certainly like to do it, but it may still (even after 
 two
 years) be premature. Everybody says they'd like to read it, but there 
 are very
 few who want to, or, more likely, have the time to, write for it.


Hmm, it might be a 'build it they will come' scenario.  I know Id like to 
contribute ( id like to do a keyword correction based on string distances 
, also want to try FSM framework and when I get more familiar with it an 
ANN [ artificial neural network ] framework ) but I never sent in the 
proposals.

Maybe we can throw them up on dsource.org for the mean time, brad ?

Another OT, are you planning on porting STLSoft's performance modules to D 
?  I was in need of this just today.

Charlie

On Wed, 5 May 2004 11:26:45 +1000, Matthew <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> 
wrote:

 Whats the other book about ?  Do you have something for D planned ( post
 1.0 maybe  :) ) ?

 It's a wait and see thing, as the proposal's not yet in to the 
 publisher. But it
 won't be long

 Also slightly OT , is The D Journal still in the works ?

 I don't know. We'd certainly like to do it, but it may still (even after 
 two
 years) be premature. Everybody says they'd like to read it, but there 
 are very
 few who want to, or, more likely, have the time to, write for it.



 Matthew wrote:
 Should be Sept/Oct.

 It could be later if I can't find a decent subtitle for it. ;/




 "fred" <info fleet-manage.com> wrote in message
 news:c79ahr$1rra$1 digitaldaemon.com...

Congratulations Matthew

When will we be able to pick up a copy of your new book ?

fred


"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message

 news:c785tn$267$1 digitaldaemon.com...

I've *finally* just sent off the last round of revisions of 



 "Imperfect C++",
which have occupied me for the last week or so. After two years of 



 effort,
 it's a

pretty weird feeling to know that it's over the line at last.

Anyway, apart from sharing an electronic sigh of relief, this means 



 that the
releases of STLSoft v1.7.1 and DTL 0.1 will now be pretty imminent. 



 Expect
 news

on both fronts within the next two weeks. I will also now put more 



 effort
 into

getting Walter to release std.loader.d and accept my updates to
std.windows.registry.d and std.recls.d.

Thanks for patience to all who've been kind enough to wait for the




 libraries,
 and

to those who've wished me well with the book writing. What an idiot 



 I must
 have

been to have thought that I should write a book. And what an idiot 



 for
 embarking

on two more this year - "Extended STL", and another that's not about 



 C++. ;)
Cheers


--
Matthew Wilson

Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
    (www.synesis.com.au/articles.html#columns)
STLSoft moderator
    (http://www.stlsoft.org)

"You can tell a Yorkshireman, but you can't tell him much!" -- Uncle 



 Michael



 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------







-- 
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

May 04 2004

"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:

"C" <qbert atari-soldiers.com> wrote in message
news:opr7ieyxr3aoygh6 news.digitalmars.com...
 I don't know. We'd certainly like to do it, but it may still (even after
 two
 years) be premature. Everybody says they'd like to read it, but there
 are very
 few who want to, or, more likely, have the time to, write for it.


 Hmm, it might be a 'build it they will come' scenario.  I know Id like to
 contribute ( id like to do a keyword correction based on string distances
 , also want to try FSM framework and when I get more familiar with it an
 ANN [ artificial neural network ] framework ) but I never sent in the
 proposals.

Very good point. The only problem there is that neither myself nor big-W have
any
spare bandwidth for TDJ at the moment. Maybe in a couple of months, but then how
many times have I said that since June 2002? :/

 Maybe we can throw them up on dsource.org for the mean time, brad ?

 Another OT, are you planning on porting STLSoft's performance modules to D
 ?  I was in need of this just today.

Yes. I've asked Walter about this a couple of times, but his plate's too small,
and it's got too much seafood on it.

What I'd like to do is have the following modules:

    std.perf
    std.linux.perf
    std.windows.perf

The latter two would be straightforward port of the UNIXSTL
(unixstl_performance_counter.h) and WinSTL classes
(winstl_performance_counter.h,
winstl_highperformance_counter.h, winstl_tick_counter.h,
winstl_processtimes_counter.h, winstl_threadtimes_counter.h). WinSTL has a
number
of flavours, the relative merits of which are described in
http://www.windevnet.com/documents/win0305a/. UNIXSTL has a comparatively
embarassing paucity of variety, with only one performance counter based on
gettimeofday.

For a port to D I'd like to see the following:
    - someone who's expert on Linux to come up with equivalents to the WinSTL
processtimes_counter, threadtimes_counter and highperformance_counter. The first
two depend on whether Linux maintains process/thread time stats; clearly it does
at least per-process timing, since the time utility does that. The latter should
probably be able to be effected using x86 commands, but I've not had chance to
look at this yet.
    - me to define std/perf.d, something along the lines of (forgiving
syntactical mistakes please):

module std.perf;

version(Windows)
{
    private import std.windows.perf;
    public alias std.windows.perf.PerformanceCounter    PerformanceCounter;
}
else version(Linux)
{
    private import std.linux.perf;
    public alias std.linux.perf.PerformanceCounter    PerformanceCounter;
}
else
{
    // usual static assertion stuff
}

Maybe I can do this now, then, eh? :) The other classes -
HighPerformanceCounter,
ThreadTimesCounter and ProcessTimesCounter can be brought into std.perf when
there are implementations for Linux.

I'm off to have a play with this now. You inspirer, you!


 Charlie

 On Wed, 5 May 2004 11:26:45 +1000, Matthew <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org>
 wrote:

 Whats the other book about ?  Do you have something for D planned ( post
 1.0 maybe  :) ) ?

 It's a wait and see thing, as the proposal's not yet in to the
 publisher. But it
 won't be long

 Also slightly OT , is The D Journal still in the works ?

 I don't know. We'd certainly like to do it, but it may still (even after
 two
 years) be premature. Everybody says they'd like to read it, but there
 are very
 few who want to, or, more likely, have the time to, write for it.



 Matthew wrote:
 Should be Sept/Oct.

 It could be later if I can't find a decent subtitle for it. ;/




 "fred" <info fleet-manage.com> wrote in message
 news:c79ahr$1rra$1 digitaldaemon.com...

Congratulations Matthew

When will we be able to pick up a copy of your new book ?

fred


"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message

 news:c785tn$267$1 digitaldaemon.com...

I've *finally* just sent off the last round of revisions of



 "Imperfect C++",
which have occupied me for the last week or so. After two years of



 effort,
 it's a

pretty weird feeling to know that it's over the line at last.

Anyway, apart from sharing an electronic sigh of relief, this means



 that the
releases of STLSoft v1.7.1 and DTL 0.1 will now be pretty imminent.



 Expect
 news

on both fronts within the next two weeks. I will also now put more



 effort
 into

getting Walter to release std.loader.d and accept my updates to
std.windows.registry.d and std.recls.d.

Thanks for patience to all who've been kind enough to wait for the




 libraries,
 and

to those who've wished me well with the book writing. What an idiot



 I must
 have

been to have thought that I should write a book. And what an idiot



 for
 embarking

on two more this year - "Extended STL", and another that's not about



 C++. ;)
Cheers


--
Matthew Wilson

Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
    (www.synesis.com.au/articles.html#columns)
STLSoft moderator
    (http://www.stlsoft.org)

"You can tell a Yorkshireman, but you can't tell him much!" -- Uncle



 Michael





 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



--







 -- 
 Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

May 04 2004

"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:

 Another OT, are you planning on porting STLSoft's performance modules to D
 ?  I was in need of this just today.

 Yes. I've asked Walter about this a couple of times, but his plate's too small,
 and it's got too much seafood on it.

 What I'd like to do is have the following modules:

     std.perf
     std.linux.perf
     std.windows.perf

 The latter two would be straightforward port of the UNIXSTL
 (unixstl_performance_counter.h) and WinSTL classes

(winstl_performance_counter.h,
 winstl_highperformance_counter.h, winstl_tick_counter.h,
 winstl_processtimes_counter.h, winstl_threadtimes_counter.h). WinSTL has a

number
 of flavours, the relative merits of which are described in
 http://www.windevnet.com/documents/win0305a/. UNIXSTL has a comparatively
 embarassing paucity of variety, with only one performance counter based on
 gettimeofday.

 For a port to D I'd like to see the following:
     - someone who's expert on Linux to come up with equivalents to the WinSTL
 processtimes_counter, threadtimes_counter and highperformance_counter. The

first
 two depend on whether Linux maintains process/thread time stats; clearly it

does
 at least per-process timing, since the time utility does that. The latter

should
 probably be able to be effected using x86 commands, but I've not had chance to
 look at this yet.
     - me to define std/perf.d, something along the lines of (forgiving
 syntactical mistakes please):

 module std.perf;

 version(Windows)
 {
     private import std.windows.perf;
     public alias std.windows.perf.PerformanceCounter    PerformanceCounter;
 }
 else version(Linux)
 {
     private import std.linux.perf;
     public alias std.linux.perf.PerformanceCounter    PerformanceCounter;
 }
 else
 {
     // usual static assertion stuff
 }

 Maybe I can do this now, then, eh? :) The other classes -

HighPerformanceCounter,
 ThreadTimesCounter and ProcessTimesCounter can be brought into std.perf when
 there are implementations for Linux.

 I'm off to have a play with this now. You inspirer, you!

Apparently, it helps not to be an idiot. I'll try and try it sometime.

It transpires that I did most of what I've just said in mid-March. Doh!

I'll patch it up and pass it onto big-W, with hope in my heart and fingers
entwined.

May 04 2004

C <qbert atari-soldiers.com> writes:

sweet

On Wed, 5 May 2004 14:39:34 +1000, Matthew <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> 
wrote:

 Another OT, are you planning on porting STLSoft's performance modules 

 to D
 ?  I was in need of this just today.

 Yes. I've asked Walter about this a couple of times, but his plate's 
 too small,
 and it's got too much seafood on it.

 What I'd like to do is have the following modules:

     std.perf
     std.linux.perf
     std.windows.perf

 The latter two would be straightforward port of the UNIXSTL
 (unixstl_performance_counter.h) and WinSTL classes

 (winstl_performance_counter.h,
 winstl_highperformance_counter.h, winstl_tick_counter.h,
 winstl_processtimes_counter.h, winstl_threadtimes_counter.h). WinSTL 
 has a

 number
 of flavours, the relative merits of which are described in
 http://www.windevnet.com/documents/win0305a/. UNIXSTL has a 
 comparatively
 embarassing paucity of variety, with only one performance counter based 
 on
 gettimeofday.

 For a port to D I'd like to see the following:
     - someone who's expert on Linux to come up with equivalents to the 
 WinSTL
 processtimes_counter, threadtimes_counter and highperformance_counter. 
 The

 first
 two depend on whether Linux maintains process/thread time stats; 
 clearly it

 does
 at least per-process timing, since the time utility does that. The 
 latter

 should
 probably be able to be effected using x86 commands, but I've not had 
 chance to
 look at this yet.
     - me to define std/perf.d, something along the lines of (forgiving
 syntactical mistakes please):

 module std.perf;

 version(Windows)
 {
     private import std.windows.perf;
     public alias std.windows.perf.PerformanceCounter    
 PerformanceCounter;
 }
 else version(Linux)
 {
     private import std.linux.perf;
     public alias std.linux.perf.PerformanceCounter    
 PerformanceCounter;
 }
 else
 {
     // usual static assertion stuff
 }

 Maybe I can do this now, then, eh? :) The other classes -

 HighPerformanceCounter,
 ThreadTimesCounter and ProcessTimesCounter can be brought into std.perf 
 when
 there are implementations for Linux.

 I'm off to have a play with this now. You inspirer, you!

 Apparently, it helps not to be an idiot. I'll try and try it sometime.

 It transpires that I did most of what I've just said in mid-March. Doh!

 I'll patch it up and pass it onto big-W, with hope in my heart and 
 fingers
 entwined.



-- 
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

May 05 2004

Brad Anderson <brad dsource.dot.org> writes:

C wrote:
 Maybe we can throw them up on dsource.org for the mean time, brad ?
 

You're talking about posting drafts of articles for TDJ?  I have no 
problem with that.

Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post 
your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.

Let me know if this is what you want, or if you want another tab across 
the top, and post html files of the articles.

BA

May 04 2004

C <qbert atari-soldiers.com> writes:

 Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post 
 your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.

That sounds , only drawback is no way to search for articles.  But I dont 
imagine that being an issue for a while, forum sounds good thanks BA.  
( thats right i did it! )

C

On Wed, 05 May 2004 01:27:18 -0500, Brad Anderson <brad dsource.dot.org> 
wrote:

 C wrote:
 Maybe we can throw them up on dsource.org for the mean time, brad ?

 You're talking about posting drafts of articles for TDJ?  I have no 
 problem with that.

 Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post 
 your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.

 Let me know if this is what you want, or if you want another tab across 
 the top, and post html files of the articles.

 BA



-- 
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

May 05 2004

"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:

Let's see how this goes for a while. It could be the best way to start TDJ. Once
there are several there, we can apply a bit of an editorial thing to it - weed
it
and reap - and maybe get the body of the first issue from there. Then we'd need
an editorial and a Word-From-Walter, and we're there!

I have a warm feeling about this ...

"C" <qbert atari-soldiers.com> wrote in message
news:opr7jj2vx6aoygh6 news.digitalmars.com...
 Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
 your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.

 That sounds , only drawback is no way to search for articles.  But I dont
 imagine that being an issue for a while, forum sounds good thanks BA.
 ( thats right i did it! )

 C

 On Wed, 05 May 2004 01:27:18 -0500, Brad Anderson <brad dsource.dot.org>
 wrote:

 C wrote:
 Maybe we can throw them up on dsource.org for the mean time, brad ?

 You're talking about posting drafts of articles for TDJ?  I have no
 problem with that.

 Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
 your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.

 Let me know if this is what you want, or if you want another tab across
 the top, and post html files of the articles.

 BA



 -- 
 Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

May 05 2004

Brad Anderson <brad dsource.dot.org> writes:

http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=18

And you can search the entire forum section of the site.  May not help 
you search *only* articles.

BA

C wrote:
 Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post 
 your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.

 
 
 That sounds , only drawback is no way to search for articles.  But I 
 dont imagine that being an issue for a while, forum sounds good thanks 
 BA.  ( thats right i did it! )
 
 C
 
 On Wed, 05 May 2004 01:27:18 -0500, Brad Anderson <brad dsource.dot.org> 
 wrote:
 
 C wrote:

 Maybe we can throw them up on dsource.org for the mean time, brad ?

 You're talking about posting drafts of articles for TDJ?  I have no 
 problem with that.

 Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post 
 your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.

 Let me know if this is what you want, or if you want another tab 
 across the top, and post html files of the articles.

 BA

May 06 2004

"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:

Cool.

I'll read it as soon as I can get it to print.

Any chance you d-sourcerors can do a print-friendy version? Or can you send me a
PDF, maybe?

"Brad Anderson" <brad dsource.dot.org> wrote in message
news:c7ebst$kf9$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=18

 And you can search the entire forum section of the site.  May not help
 you search *only* articles.

 BA

 C wrote:
 Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
 your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.


 That sounds , only drawback is no way to search for articles.  But I
 dont imagine that being an issue for a while, forum sounds good thanks
 BA.  ( thats right i did it! )

 C

 On Wed, 05 May 2004 01:27:18 -0500, Brad Anderson <brad dsource.dot.org>
 wrote:

 C wrote:

 Maybe we can throw them up on dsource.org for the mean time, brad ?

 You're talking about posting drafts of articles for TDJ?  I have no
 problem with that.

 Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
 your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.

 Let me know if this is what you want, or if you want another tab
 across the top, and post html files of the articles.

 BA

May 06 2004

resistor AT nospam DOT mac DOT com <resistor_member pathlink.com> writes:

If I get a chance, I'll LaTeX it.  But I'm a bit bogged down in schoolwork this
evening.

Owen

In article <c7ege2$r0r$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew says...
Cool.

I'll read it as soon as I can get it to print.

Any chance you d-sourcerors can do a print-friendy version? Or can you send me a
PDF, maybe?

"Brad Anderson" <brad dsource.dot.org> wrote in message
news:c7ebst$kf9$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=18

 And you can search the entire forum section of the site.  May not help
 you search *only* articles.

 BA

 C wrote:
 Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
 your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.


 That sounds , only drawback is no way to search for articles.  But I
 dont imagine that being an issue for a while, forum sounds good thanks
 BA.  ( thats right i did it! )

 C

 On Wed, 05 May 2004 01:27:18 -0500, Brad Anderson <brad dsource.dot.org>
 wrote:

 C wrote:

 Maybe we can throw them up on dsource.org for the mean time, brad ?

 You're talking about posting drafts of articles for TDJ?  I have no
 problem with that.

 Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
 your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.

 Let me know if this is what you want, or if you want another tab
 across the top, and post html files of the articles.

 BA

May 06 2004

Brad Anderson <brad sankaty.dot.com> writes:

Matthew wrote:
 Cool.
 
 I'll read it as soon as I can get it to print.
 
 Any chance you d-sourcerors can do a print-friendy version? Or can you send me
a
 PDF, maybe?

I sent an html copy to you back in Jan/Feb timeframe.  Want it again?

 
 "Brad Anderson" <brad dsource.dot.org> wrote in message
 news:c7ebst$kf9$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 
http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=18

And you can search the entire forum section of the site.  May not help
you search *only* articles.

BA

C wrote:

Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.


That sounds , only drawback is no way to search for articles.  But I
dont imagine that being an issue for a while, forum sounds good thanks
BA.  ( thats right i did it! )

C

On Wed, 05 May 2004 01:27:18 -0500, Brad Anderson <brad dsource.dot.org>
wrote:


C wrote:


Maybe we can throw them up on dsource.org for the mean time, brad ?

You're talking about posting drafts of articles for TDJ?  I have no
problem with that.

Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.

Let me know if this is what you want, or if you want another tab
across the top, and post html files of the articles.

BA

May 06 2004

"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:

Hang on. Checking the TDJ records ...


Got it! Printing now. I'm bumping you up over several articles I am supposed to
be reviewing. (Don't let that go to your head, though, it's probably more to do
with it being D vs some "other" languages I'm reviewing for. ;)

"Brad Anderson" <brad sankaty.dot.com> wrote in message
news:c7eio8$ue6$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Matthew wrote:
 Cool.

 I'll read it as soon as I can get it to print.

 Any chance you d-sourcerors can do a print-friendy version? Or can you send


me a
 PDF, maybe?

 I sent an html copy to you back in Jan/Feb timeframe.  Want it again?

 "Brad Anderson" <brad dsource.dot.org> wrote in message
 news:c7ebst$kf9$1 digitaldaemon.com...

http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=18

And you can search the entire forum section of the site.  May not help
you search *only* articles.

BA

C wrote:

Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.


That sounds , only drawback is no way to search for articles.  But I
dont imagine that being an issue for a while, forum sounds good thanks
BA.  ( thats right i did it! )

C

On Wed, 05 May 2004 01:27:18 -0500, Brad Anderson <brad dsource.dot.org>
wrote:


C wrote:


Maybe we can throw them up on dsource.org for the mean time, brad ?

You're talking about posting drafts of articles for TDJ?  I have no
problem with that.

Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.

Let me know if this is what you want, or if you want another tab
across the top, and post html files of the articles.

BA

May 06 2004

resistor AT nospam DOT mac DOT com <resistor_member pathlink.com> writes:

Bah.  Just as I finish LaTeXing it too.  Anyways, my typeset version it at
http://resistor.dyndns.org/
fileparsing.zip

Owen

In article <c7el11$11u7$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew says...
Hang on. Checking the TDJ records ...


Got it! Printing now. I'm bumping you up over several articles I am supposed to
be reviewing. (Don't let that go to your head, though, it's probably more to do
with it being D vs some "other" languages I'm reviewing for. ;)

"Brad Anderson" <brad sankaty.dot.com> wrote in message
news:c7eio8$ue6$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Matthew wrote:
 Cool.

 I'll read it as soon as I can get it to print.

 Any chance you d-sourcerors can do a print-friendy version? Or can you send


me a
 PDF, maybe?

 I sent an html copy to you back in Jan/Feb timeframe.  Want it again?

 "Brad Anderson" <brad dsource.dot.org> wrote in message
 news:c7ebst$kf9$1 digitaldaemon.com...

http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=18

And you can search the entire forum section of the site.  May not help
you search *only* articles.

BA

C wrote:

Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.


That sounds , only drawback is no way to search for articles.  But I
dont imagine that being an issue for a while, forum sounds good thanks
BA.  ( thats right i did it! )

C

On Wed, 05 May 2004 01:27:18 -0500, Brad Anderson <brad dsource.dot.org>
wrote:


C wrote:


Maybe we can throw them up on dsource.org for the mean time, brad ?

You're talking about posting drafts of articles for TDJ?  I have no
problem with that.

Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.

Let me know if this is what you want, or if you want another tab
across the top, and post html files of the articles.

BA

May 06 2004

"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:

Doesn't get that as a valid url. :(

"resistor AT nospam DOT mac DOT com" <resistor_member pathlink.com> wrote in
message news:c7enpp$15nf$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Bah.  Just as I finish LaTeXing it too.  Anyways, my typeset version it at
 http://resistor.dyndns.org/
 fileparsing.zip

 Owen

 In article <c7el11$11u7$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew says...
Hang on. Checking the TDJ records ...


Got it! Printing now. I'm bumping you up over several articles I am supposed


to
be reviewing. (Don't let that go to your head, though, it's probably more to


do
with it being D vs some "other" languages I'm reviewing for. ;)

"Brad Anderson" <brad sankaty.dot.com> wrote in message
news:c7eio8$ue6$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Matthew wrote:
 Cool.

 I'll read it as soon as I can get it to print.

 Any chance you d-sourcerors can do a print-friendy version? Or can you




send
me a
 PDF, maybe?

 I sent an html copy to you back in Jan/Feb timeframe.  Want it again?

 "Brad Anderson" <brad dsource.dot.org> wrote in message
 news:c7ebst$kf9$1 digitaldaemon.com...

http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=18

And you can search the entire forum section of the site.  May not help
you search *only* articles.

BA

C wrote:

Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.


That sounds , only drawback is no way to search for articles.  But I
dont imagine that being an issue for a while, forum sounds good thanks
BA.  ( thats right i did it! )

C

On Wed, 05 May 2004 01:27:18 -0500, Brad Anderson <brad dsource.dot.org>
wrote:


C wrote:


Maybe we can throw them up on dsource.org for the mean time, brad ?

You're talking about posting drafts of articles for TDJ?  I have no
problem with that.

Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.

Let me know if this is what you want, or if you want another tab
across the top, and post html files of the articles.

BA

May 07 2004

resistor AT nospam DOT mac DOT com <resistor_member pathlink.com> writes:

Hmm.  It works locally.  Might be a DNS problem.  I'll email it to you directly
though.  At just over 
100kb, I don't want to attach it to the NG.

Owen

In article <c7h2aq$1q0j$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew says...
Doesn't get that as a valid url. :(

"resistor AT nospam DOT mac DOT com" <resistor_member pathlink.com> wrote in
message news:c7enpp$15nf$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Bah.  Just as I finish LaTeXing it too.  Anyways, my typeset version it at
 http://resistor.dyndns.org/
 fileparsing.zip

 Owen

 In article <c7el11$11u7$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew says...
Hang on. Checking the TDJ records ...


Got it! Printing now. I'm bumping you up over several articles I am supposed


to
be reviewing. (Don't let that go to your head, though, it's probably more to


do
with it being D vs some "other" languages I'm reviewing for. ;)

"Brad Anderson" <brad sankaty.dot.com> wrote in message
news:c7eio8$ue6$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Matthew wrote:
 Cool.

 I'll read it as soon as I can get it to print.

 Any chance you d-sourcerors can do a print-friendy version? Or can you




send
me a
 PDF, maybe?

 I sent an html copy to you back in Jan/Feb timeframe.  Want it again?

 "Brad Anderson" <brad dsource.dot.org> wrote in message
 news:c7ebst$kf9$1 digitaldaemon.com...

http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=18

And you can search the entire forum section of the site.  May not help
you search *only* articles.

BA

C wrote:

Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.


That sounds , only drawback is no way to search for articles.  But I
dont imagine that being an issue for a while, forum sounds good thanks
BA.  ( thats right i did it! )

C

On Wed, 05 May 2004 01:27:18 -0500, Brad Anderson <brad dsource.dot.org>
wrote:


C wrote:


Maybe we can throw them up on dsource.org for the mean time, brad ?

You're talking about posting drafts of articles for TDJ?  I have no
problem with that.

Do you want a forum?  That would be the best, because you could post
your article as a sticky new topic, and people could quote, comment.

Let me know if this is what you want, or if you want another tab
across the top, and post html files of the articles.

BA

May 07 2004

J C Calvarese <jcc7 cox.net> writes:

Matthew wrote:
 Cool.
 
 I'll read it as soon as I can get it to print.
 
 Any chance you d-sourcerors can do a print-friendy version? Or can you send me
a
 PDF, maybe?

I created a PDF (with OpenOffice.org) and put it up in the D Lab 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/d_lab/) Files > articles section.

 
 "Brad Anderson" <brad dsource.dot.org> wrote in message
 news:c7ebst$kf9$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 
http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=18


...

-- 
Justin (a/k/a jcc7)
http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/

May 06 2004

D Programming

C/C++ Programming

Other

c++.stlsoft - DTL, STLSoft, etc. coming soon