digitalmars.D - Optlink messages
- Jeremy (12/12) Jun 20 2006 C:\dmd\FreeUniverse>build FreeUniverse.d -cleanup -O -debug -inline
- pragma (9/21) Jun 20 2006 Out of curiosity, did you try using "-full" on the command line as well?
- Jeremy (6/32) Jun 20 2006 Using "-full" does not change the outcome -- I get those errors whether ...
- Tom S (5/14) Jun 20 2006 The trick is that -clean / -cleanup is enough, since it deletes the
- Derek Parnell (6/14) Jun 20 2006 This is my TODO list ;-)
- Derek Parnell (23/36) Jun 20 2006 This is caused by using Build with a response file for the Linker (the
- Jeremy (2/41) Jun 20 2006 Yay, sounds good :) Is that -exec bug going to be fixed too?
- Derek Parnell (6/8) Jun 20 2006 Yes, and a few others too to fix when 'gcc' is the linker. ;-)
C:\dmd\FreeUniverse>build FreeUniverse.d -cleanup -O -debug -inline C:\dmd\FreeUniverse>build FreeUniverse.d -cleanup -O -release -inline OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 7.50B1 Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989 - 2001 All Rights Reserved c:\dmd\lib\phobos.lib(ti_double) Offset 1C75EH Record Type 0091 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : __init_10TypeInfo_d c:\dmd\lib\phobos.lib(ti_double) Offset 1C778H Record Type 0091 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : __Class_10TypeInfo_d c:\dmd\lib\phobos.lib(ti_double) Offset 1C791H Record Type 0091 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : __vtbl_10TypeInfo_d So, it seems to compile fine with -debug, but when I use -release, I get weird errors. This is using the new DMD v0.161 -- any ideas?
Jun 20 2006
In article <e793de$282g$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Jeremy says...C:\dmd\FreeUniverse>build FreeUniverse.d -cleanup -O -debug -inline C:\dmd\FreeUniverse>build FreeUniverse.d -cleanup -O -release -inline OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 7.50B1 Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989 - 2001 All Rights Reserved c:\dmd\lib\phobos.lib(ti_double) Offset 1C75EH Record Type 0091 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : __init_10TypeInfo_d c:\dmd\lib\phobos.lib(ti_double) Offset 1C778H Record Type 0091 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : __Class_10TypeInfo_d c:\dmd\lib\phobos.lib(ti_double) Offset 1C791H Record Type 0091 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : __vtbl_10TypeInfo_d So, it seems to compile fine with -debug, but when I use -release, I get weird errors. This is using the new DMD v0.161 -- any ideas?Out of curiosity, did you try using "-full" on the command line as well? Let me preface this by saing that Build is an *awesome* tool for D. I use it exclusively when compiling my apps. But bulid has one drawback: it doesn't distinguish between debug/release builds when it checks the file times of your object files. So if you build once in release, update one or two files, and build again in debug, only those two files will be recompiled - despite the fact that the mode of compilation has changed. - EricAnderton at yahoo
Jun 20 2006
Jeremy <Jeremy_member pathlink.com> In article <e79a5p$2jsd$1 digitaldaemon.com>, pragma says...In article <e793de$282g$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Jeremy says...Using "-full" does not change the outcome -- I get those errors whether I use that option or not. I did not have these problems in DMD v0.160. I guess I will be compiling in "-debug" mode until this gets resolved :( Thank you for the suggestion, but unfortunately it doesn't help :( - JeremyC:\dmd\FreeUniverse>build FreeUniverse.d -cleanup -O -debug -inline C:\dmd\FreeUniverse>build FreeUniverse.d -cleanup -O -release -inline OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 7.50B1 Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989 - 2001 All Rights Reserved c:\dmd\lib\phobos.lib(ti_double) Offset 1C75EH Record Type 0091 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : __init_10TypeInfo_d c:\dmd\lib\phobos.lib(ti_double) Offset 1C778H Record Type 0091 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : __Class_10TypeInfo_d c:\dmd\lib\phobos.lib(ti_double) Offset 1C791H Record Type 0091 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : __vtbl_10TypeInfo_d So, it seems to compile fine with -debug, but when I use -release, I get weird errors. This is using the new DMD v0.161 -- any ideas?Out of curiosity, did you try using "-full" on the command line as well? Let me preface this by saing that Build is an *awesome* tool for D. I use it exclusively when compiling my apps. But bulid has one drawback: it doesn't distinguish between debug/release builds when it checks the file times of your object files. So if you build once in release, update one or two files, and build again in debug, only those two files will be recompiled - despite the fact that the mode of compilation has changed. - EricAnderton at yahoo
Jun 20 2006
pragma wrote:Out of curiosity, did you try using "-full" on the command line as well? Let me preface this by saing that Build is an *awesome* tool for D. I use it exclusively when compiling my apps. But bulid has one drawback: it doesn't distinguish between debug/release builds when it checks the file times of your object files. So if you build once in release, update one or two files, and build again in debug, only those two files will be recompiled - despite the fact that the mode of compilation has changed.The trick is that -clean / -cleanup is enough, since it deletes the object files :) -- Tomasz Stachowiak /+ a.k.a. h3r3tic +/
Jun 20 2006
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 03:10:18 +1000, pragma <pragma_member pathlink.com> wrote:But bulid has one drawback: it doesn't distinguish between debug/release builds when it checks the file times of your object files. So if you build once in release, update one or two files, and build again in debug, only those two files will be recompiled - despite the fact that the mode of compilation has changed.This is my TODO list ;-) -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia
Jun 20 2006
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:14:54 +1000, Jeremy <Jeremy_member pathlink.com> wrote:C:\dmd\FreeUniverse>build FreeUniverse.d -cleanup -O -debug -inline C:\dmd\FreeUniverse>build FreeUniverse.d -cleanup -O -release -inline OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 7.50B1 Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989 - 2001 All Rights Reserved c:\dmd\lib\phobos.lib(ti_double) Offset 1C75EH Record Type 0091 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : __init_10TypeInfo_d c:\dmd\lib\phobos.lib(ti_double) Offset 1C778H Record Type 0091 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : __Class_10TypeInfo_d c:\dmd\lib\phobos.lib(ti_double) Offset 1C791H Record Type 0091 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : __vtbl_10TypeInfo_d So, it seems to compile fine with -debug, but when I use -release, I get weird errors. This is using the new DMD v0.161 -- any ideas?This is caused by using Build with a response file for the Linker (the default behaviour). If you run Build with the -R=No switch, it should work. The problem is I create the response file as ... test.obj test.exe test.map somelib.lib test.def test.res /noi/map but OptLink doesn't like this. It turns out I need to create it as ... test.obj test.exe test.map somelib.lib test.def test.res/noi/map I've repaired Build and will release it later today. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia
Jun 20 2006
In article <op.tbgvkcku6b8z09 ginger.vic.bigpond.net.au>, Derek Parnell says...On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:14:54 +1000, Jeremy <Jeremy_member pathlink.com> wrote:Yay, sounds good :) Is that -exec bug going to be fixed too?C:\dmd\FreeUniverse>build FreeUniverse.d -cleanup -O -debug -inline C:\dmd\FreeUniverse>build FreeUniverse.d -cleanup -O -release -inline OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 7.50B1 Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989 - 2001 All Rights Reserved c:\dmd\lib\phobos.lib(ti_double) Offset 1C75EH Record Type 0091 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : __init_10TypeInfo_d c:\dmd\lib\phobos.lib(ti_double) Offset 1C778H Record Type 0091 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : __Class_10TypeInfo_d c:\dmd\lib\phobos.lib(ti_double) Offset 1C791H Record Type 0091 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : __vtbl_10TypeInfo_d So, it seems to compile fine with -debug, but when I use -release, I get weird errors. This is using the new DMD v0.161 -- any ideas?This is caused by using Build with a response file for the Linker (the default behaviour). If you run Build with the -R=No switch, it should work. The problem is I create the response file as ... test.obj test.exe test.map somelib.lib test.def test.res /noi/map but OptLink doesn't like this. It turns out I need to create it as ... test.obj test.exe test.map somelib.lib test.def test.res/noi/map I've repaired Build and will release it later today. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia
Jun 20 2006
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:14:20 +1000, Jeremy <Jeremy_member pathlink.com> wrote:I've repaired Build and will release it later today.Yay, sounds good :) Is that -exec bug going to be fixed too?Yes, and a few others too to fix when 'gcc' is the linker. ;-) -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia
Jun 20 2006