• Sjoerd van Leent (19/19) Jun 14 2006 Hello All,
• pragma (6/23) Jun 14 2006 Sjoerd, have you considered using Enki to help you get development resta...
• Sjoerd van Leent (9/41) Jun 15 2006 Definitely consider Enki. The only difference is the way it is
• Sjoerd van Leent (1/1) Jun 15 2006 I meant of course, BNF syntax

Sjoerd van Leent <svanleent gmail.com> writes:

Hello All,

I stopped development at DGrammar months ago (perhaps more than a year 
ago). Nevertheless, I have come back and have made some decisions about 
what to do with it.

1 ) DGrammar was build using YACC, and thus C, C++, Flex and Bison where 
necessary to get the beast compiled, and it didn't even do it's job the 
way I would like it.

2 ) DGrammar was a bit of "make one messy file" architecture, which of 
course isn't about a professional environment.

3 ) I've began at first writing boiler plate Machines. The first one is 
a PDA Machine (Stack machine), and I like it to be tested. Simply run 
"build" over dmachine.d. And enter something like:

"dmachine aabbbbbaa"

This is just an example, try to make some machines with it, I try to 
make it working better with the lambda problem I'm still having (it is 
solved Q&R now, which isn't the way I like it, any solutions would be 
welcome)

Regards,
Sjoerd

pragma <pragma_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <e6plrg$1usq$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Sjoerd van Leent says...
Hello All,

I stopped development at DGrammar months ago (perhaps more than a year 
ago). Nevertheless, I have come back and have made some decisions about 
what to do with it.

1 ) DGrammar was build using YACC, and thus C, C++, Flex and Bison where 
necessary to get the beast compiled, and it didn't even do it's job the 
way I would like it.

2 ) DGrammar was a bit of "make one messy file" architecture, which of 
course isn't about a professional environment.

3 ) I've began at first writing boiler plate Machines. The first one is 
a PDA Machine (Stack machine), and I like it to be tested. Simply run 
"build" over dmachine.d. And enter something like:

"dmachine aabbbbbaa"

This is just an example, try to make some machines with it, I try to 
make it working better with the lambda problem I'm still having (it is 
solved Q&R now, which isn't the way I like it, any solutions would be 
welcome)

Sjoerd, have you considered using Enki to help you get development restarted?  I
know that the two projects share some basic similarities - heck, DGrammar is
what inspired me to write it in the first place.

Anyway, the whole thing is BSD licensed, so feel free to use it as you see fit.

- EricAnderton at yahoo

Sjoerd van Leent <svanleent gmail.com> writes:

pragma schreef:
 In article <e6plrg$1usq$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Sjoerd van Leent says...
 Hello All,

 I stopped development at DGrammar months ago (perhaps more than a year 
 ago). Nevertheless, I have come back and have made some decisions about 
 what to do with it.

 1 ) DGrammar was build using YACC, and thus C, C++, Flex and Bison where 
 necessary to get the beast compiled, and it didn't even do it's job the 
 way I would like it.

 2 ) DGrammar was a bit of "make one messy file" architecture, which of 
 course isn't about a professional environment.

 3 ) I've began at first writing boiler plate Machines. The first one is 
 a PDA Machine (Stack machine), and I like it to be tested. Simply run 
 "build" over dmachine.d. And enter something like:

 "dmachine aabbbbbaa"

 This is just an example, try to make some machines with it, I try to 
 make it working better with the lambda problem I'm still having (it is 
 solved Q&R now, which isn't the way I like it, any solutions would be 
 welcome)

 
 Sjoerd, have you considered using Enki to help you get development restarted? 
I
 know that the two projects share some basic similarities - heck, DGrammar is
 what inspired me to write it in the first place.
 
 Anyway, the whole thing is BSD licensed, so feel free to use it as you see fit.
 
 - EricAnderton at yahoo

Definitely consider Enki. The only difference is the way it is 
processed. At the end I want to let DGrammer use a "BDF" styled input 
file, and let it generate a parser.

When that's done, I'd like for it to be able (just as in the first 
trials) to run it through some kind of interface architecture, making it 
a two-step process: Parsing and Processing, just as SAX does.

Regards,
Sjoerd

Sjoerd van Leent <svanleent gmail.com> writes:

I meant of course, BNF syntax